• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 39)
<<
<
47 of 127
>>
>
Wozza20
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by D.M.N.:
“Utterly bemused by The Last Weekend's rating, its lead-in was better than last week yet it went under 2m? It doesn't matter how awful the drama is, it shouldn't be going under 2m!”

Is it any good. I have this in my planner to watch, but the low ratings are hardly inspiring me to do so.
Did it have too bigger cross over in audience with the more popular George Gently which has harmed it?
Roscoe Barnes
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by Wozza20:
“Is it any good. I have this in my planner to watch, but the low ratings are hardly inspiring me to do so.
Did it have too bigger cross over in audience with the more popular George Gently which has harmed it?”

I think its pretty good yeah. I don't watch that many ITV dramas tbh but for some reason I did with this one. Its different to most other ITV dramas. You'll know what I mean when you start watching.
grimshaw
27-08-2012
Miller just sits to get the ITV1 ratings and then report them, thats a real problem for the articles he writes. Am not saying he aims to change things, just he reports from what he cares about (not the readers) and often goes in looking for what he is excited about (that The Voice article way back).

Am not saying he needs to stop writing them or anything, just sit more calmly and read the figures then report, its all a bit rushed in excitement and so the articles are not biased their just not fully reporting things.


ITV1 had a worse night that I first though. Last Weekend just got killed by Gently and it didn't start with a great audience. Someone said for the first episode it would be low because 'it wasn't very ITV' - I haven't seen it so whats the problem here?

CBB did decent for a weekend show and overall Ch5 had a very strong evening.
Fudd
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by Wozza20:
“I agree with this completely. People are now having to chase Corrie around the schedules. At least with BBC1, you KNOW when EastEnders is going to be on. I would look at something like this for consistency:

Monday
19:00 - Emmerdale
19:30 - Countrywise (1hr long)
20:30 - Coronation Street
21:00 - New Drama

Tuesday
19:00 - Emmerdale
19:30 - Champions League
or
19:30 - You've Been Framed
20:00 - Midsomer Murders/Lewis

Wednesday
19:00 - Emmerdale
20:00 - Coronation Street
21:00 - New Drama

Thursday
19:00 - Emmerdale
19:30 - The Dales
20:00 - Tonight/Current Affairs
20:30 - Coronation Street
21:00 - Documentaries/1 off shows

Friday
19:00 - Emmerdale
19:30 - Paul O'Grady/LE shows
20:00 - New Comedy/Sitcom
20:30 - Coronation Street
21:00 - Benidorm/New Comedy Drama

All soaps would avoid EastEnders clashes, and therefore not dent eachother in the ratings while keeping 2.5hrs of Corrue and 3hrs of Emmerdale per week.
If lead-in's are still seen as important, it would give a permanent high audience lead-in from Corrie to the 9pm shows. It would make Monday-Wednesday the place to go for new ITV drama, would give a more PSB/educational feel to Thursday, and a comedy feel to Friday.
This would also give the early part of the evening an Emmerdale anchor with a Corrie anchor for the competitive 9pm slot.
EastEnders could also then uniform its soaps at 19:30 or 20:00 on the current days without any clash.

Give me a week at ITV, and I could sort their weekly ratings out... ”

I think I'd go with this (spoilered as I know people are sick with fantasy schedules):

Spoiler
Monday
19.00 Emmerdale
19.30 Coronation Street
20.00 *Current Affairs*
20.30 Coronation Street
21.00 *New drama*

Tuesday
19.00 Emmerdale
19.30 Football/*Documentary*
20.00 Football/*Two hour drama*

Wednesday
19.00 *Quiz show/Gameshow*
20.00 Coronation Street
20.30 Emmerdale
21.00 *New Drama*

Thursday
19.00 *Documentary*
20.00 Coronation Street
20.30 Emmerdale
21.00 *Comedy/comedy dramas*

Friday
19.00 Emmerdale
20.00 *Current Affairs/Documentary*
20.30 Coronation Street
21.00 *Documentary/One Off show*

The 8pm gets much more support then it has now and the bigger show leads in to the smaller show. Clashes with EastEnders are avoided. The sixth Emmerdale episode is tagged onto a regular episode and, even where it moves away from the 7pm slot, it'll get a Coronation Street boost. The 7pm slot itself is opened up on Tuesday's and Thursday's where the main opposition is The One Show and the news. Coronation Street is spread out throughout the week with only one 'double' night and always has an episode following EastEnders so it's helped by a natural crossover. Thursday has traditionally worked as a comedy drama night with ITV (IIRC the likes of Fat Friends, At Home with the Braithwaites and Benidrom aired/have aired on Thursday's to decent figures) so I'd stick with that and 'abandon' Friday's slightly with the documentaries being aired there. Wednesday is a strong night for ITV so I'd air the new dramas there as that should be the channel's bread and butter.
Fudd
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by grimshaw:
“ITV1 had a worse night that I first though. Last Weekend just got killed by Gently and it didn't start with a great audience. Someone said for the first episode it would be low because 'it wasn't very ITV' - I haven't seen it so whats the problem here?

CBB did decent for a weekend show and overall Ch5 had a very strong evening.”

It's quirky and original - people complain that ITV stick with too many crime dramas (and I suspect they'll commission a few costume dramas now after the success of Downton Abbey) but when they do deviate and commission something different it generally flops.
Glenn A
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“I think it was more the Peter Kay effect. Some episodes have already averaged 2m+, in line with or even slightly ahead of the equivalent episodes in the previous series.”

He could have pulled some of the audience away, but it's still reasonable. I'm still of the opinion the normal version should go now and Channel 5 to have two runs of CBB each year, same as I suggested when Channel 4 was cancelling it.
Paul Millar
27-08-2012
For heaven's sake I'm really not biased and, if it has seemed so in the past, I can only apologise for sloppiness on my part.

I always keep tabs on this thread because I enjoy the discussion, and like to read suggestions/complaints so I can think about them and act on them if they make sense.

Sometimes I do have to rush and admit I've made mistakes in the past, but I do care a lot about writing the ratings and always try to remain balanced with any analysis. I understand though that it'll never please everyone - because of the (usually pleasantly light hearted) pro/anti BBC/ITV posters.

Talking about gameshows faring "better", I was indeed comparing it with The Last Weekend.
NeilVW
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by Wozza20:
“I just read the DS article from Paul, and I didn't feel it had any bias at all towards ITV1. There was praise for Channel 5 for coming 3rd placed, and there is a comment about BBC1 taking the primetime crown with over double the ITV1 audience. I thought it looked like a fair report. The gameshows did fare better than the new drama, he was not lying about that. ”

Even he could hardly ignore the primetime Sunday drubbing of ITV1 by BBC1 without looking ridiculous, but he tries to inject a little saving grace for ITV1 where there is, in fact, none.
Dancc
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by Glenn A:
“He could have pulled some of the audience away, but it's still reasonable. I'm still of the opinion the normal version should go now and Channel 5 to have two runs of CBB each year, same as I suggested when Channel 4 was cancelling it.”

Yes, it's a popular suggestion. But C5 have already confirmed BB will be back next year so they're committed to giving it another go without the sporting distractions of this past summer. Drop Dowling, cast a bit more widely, and they've got a show.
Wozza20
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by Glenn A:
“He could have pulled some of the audience away, but it's still reasonable. I'm still of the opinion the normal version should go now and Channel 5 to have two runs of CBB each year, same as I suggested when Channel 4 was cancelling it.”

I can see what you are saying, but there is nothing else up Channel 5's sleeve which can pull in over 1m viewers almost every day of the summer for 6-8 weeks, especially the advertiser friendly demographic.
grimshaw
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“It's quirky and original - people complain that ITV stick with too many crime dramas (and I suspect they'll commission a few costume dramas now after the success of Downton Abbey) but when they do deviate and commission something different it generally flops.”

I think ITV sometimes struggle to market non-crime dramas (tbf, its not like the BBC isn't full of them as well); I've seen little clips of The Last Weekend but overall nothing came across in terms of tone, plot, quality - anything.

Shame.

Originally Posted by Paul Millar:
“I always keep tabs on this thread because I enjoy the discussion, and like to read suggestions/complaints so I can think about them and act on them if they make sense.

Sometimes I do have to rush and admit I've made mistakes in the past, but I do care a lot about writing the ratings and always try to remain balanced with any analysis. I understand though that it'll never please everyone - because of the (usually pleasantly light hearted) pro/anti BBC/ITV posters.”

Fair enough.
D.M.N.
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by Paul Millar:
“For heaven's sake I'm really not biased and, if it has seemed so in the past, I can only apologise for sloppiness on my part.

I always keep tabs on this thread because I enjoy the discussion, and like to read suggestions/complaints so I can think about them and act on them if they make sense.

Sometimes I do have to rush and admit I've made mistakes in the past, but I do care a lot about writing the ratings and always try to remain balanced with any analysis. I understand though that it'll never please everyone - because of the (usually pleasantly light hearted) pro/anti BBC/ITV posters.

Talking about gameshows faring "better", I was indeed comparing it with The Last Weekend.”

We appreciate the ratings articles, but Saturday's was somewhat odd the way it was written given that The X Factor's rating was the lowest for a second audition show since 2007, and Red or Black's rating for the second show was lower than last week's second show, which is not increased momentum, it is decreased momentum.

I remember once upon a time you came into here asking for suggestions on how to improve the articles, nothing appears to have happened on that front.

DS seems to stick with terrestrial between 20:00 and 22:00, primetime shares and multichannel winner. At least Broadcast has a lot more ratings and deviates a bit, and you can get a lot more ratings data nowadays on ITV Media, even on days they do perform poorly(!).
kittenkong42
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by D.M.N.:
“Well they ignored Countryfile's and Antiques Roadshow's ratings. Oddly.”

And do we have a figure for those shows?
Andy23
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by AlexiR:
“What is the point of the Lottery branding?

The general agreement at this stage seems to be that the National Lottery branding doesn't make viewers any more likely to tune into a show and as far as I can tell the Lottery draws themselves offer nothing to the quiz formats they're attached to. Its not like a central competent of In It To Win It for example is the Lottery draws. We're a far cry away from the shiny floor shows that launched around the Lottery when it was in its infancy and the Lottery draw was almost entirely the point. At this stage they may as well just have a random draw on its won at 8:30 because that's pretty much all it is now. Its essentially an ad break (or a series of ad breaks) in the middle of this quizzes. Its very odd.”

I agree, as there seems to be no chance of them doing any of the old style lottery shows that don't involve a quiz anymore, it's time to seperate the quizzes from the lottery. They don't even pretend it is part of the same show anymore, since 'Lottery HQ' was invented

Quote:
“On the subject of the quiz shows themselves its just boring having these shows on for 60-70% of the year. It doesn't help that its just the same dull shows repeated every year. If they're going to insist on having a 'quiz show slot' on Saturday night they could at least invest in some new and more exciting formats. I think this is particularly true for when they're airing big shows like The Voice or Doctor Who or to a lesser extent Strictly. Its great that In It To Win It gives you a consistent audience but by the same token its not going to give you a new audience. BBC1 Saturday nights are just a holding pattern all year round.”

This applies to large parts of BBC1's schedule, if it's not broken don't fix it, hence Countryfile & Antiques Roadshow all year round, Holby all year round, The One Show all year round etc.


Quote:
“Also worth remembering of course that the BBC haven't successfully launched a sitcom in prime time on BBC1 in years. All their recent hits have either started in late night slots (Outnumbered, Mrs Brown's Boys) or been drafted in from other BBC channels (Miranda, Gavin & Stacey). I actually struggle to think of a single comedy that's launched on BBC1 in prime time and done well since My Family (which coincidentally critics hated). Surely there has to have been one (right?) but I cannot for the life of me name it.”

Which will be why ITV have few attempts, because the middle of the prime time is all they have. 10:30pm on ITV1 doesn't have a big enough audience to develop anything and ITV2 doesn't work in the same way as BBC2.

Originally Posted by D.M.N.:
“Sunday 26th August 2012

ITV1
19:00 - The Chase: Celebrity Special: 3.15m (16.8%), +1: 151k (0.8%)
20:00 - Who Wants to be a Millionaire?: School's Out: 3.14m (14.7%), +1: 106k (0.5%)
21:00 - The Last Weekend: 1.98m (8.8%), +1: 196k (1.1%)

Utterly bemused by The Last Weekend's rating, its lead-in was better than last week yet it went under 2m? It doesn't matter how awful the drama is, it shouldn't be going under 2m!.”

Originally Posted by Fudd:
“It's quirky and original - people complain that ITV stick with too many crime dramas (and I suspect they'll commission a few costume dramas now after the success of Downton Abbey) but when they do deviate and commission something different it generally flops.”

And this is why they rarely deviate from your Frost/Morse/Marple type detective stuff.
Wozza20
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by Paul Millar:
“For heaven's sake I'm really not biased and, if it has seemed so in the past, I can only apologise for sloppiness on my part.

I always keep tabs on this thread because I enjoy the discussion, and like to read suggestions/complaints so I can think about them and act on them if they make sense.

Sometimes I do have to rush and admit I've made mistakes in the past, but I do care a lot about writing the ratings and always try to remain balanced with any analysis. I understand though that it'll never please everyone - because of the (usually pleasantly light hearted) pro/anti BBC/ITV posters.

Talking about gameshows faring "better", I was indeed comparing it with The Last Weekend.”

Which is EXACTLY how I read it as I have no bias towards either of the broadcasters.

The problem is, you can not mention anything positive about a bad night on ITV without the pro-BBC lot complaining. If you knocked ITV when they had a bad night, you would have the pro-ITV lot having a go.

It depends on people's agenda on how they view your reports in my opinion. As I have no agenda, favoured broadcaster or willfulness to see a broadcaster fail, I often can not see where the critisism comes from.
Glenn A
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“Yes, it's a popular suggestion. But C5 have already confirmed BB will be back next year so they're committed to giving it another go without the sporting distractions of this past summer. Drop Dowling, cast a bit more widely, and they've got a show.”

I think Channel 5 have made some overdue modifications to the show, they realised hardly anyone was watching through the night so cancelled filming people asleep, the pointless fanzine shows have gone, the season has been cut to 10 weeks and the set looks nicer. However, I would go for a 6 week run, get a new host and cast the net wider for housemates, maybe older and less unpleasant ones would be a good idea.
RobbieSykes123
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by grimshaw:
“Miller just sits to get the ITV1 ratings and then report them, thats a real problem for the articles he writes. Am not saying he aims to change things, just he reports from what he cares about (not the readers) and often goes in looking for what he is excited about (that The Voice article way back).”

Originally Posted by Paul Millar:
“For heaven's sake I'm really not biased and, if it has seemed so in the past, I can only apologise for sloppiness on my part.”

Paul - when you used to post on here, before joining "the staff", you were obsessed with ITV1 and how you could make it better, posting endless fantasy schedules - for ITV1.

So you can see why folk on here get a bit uppity about your ITV1-obsessed ratings reports - I don't necessarily mean you are biased or fail to be objective, you just forget the shows on other channels that we all might be interested in. So Countryfile may well have won the day yesterday, or at least come second, but we don't know and won't do till MediaGuardian reports tomorrow, because you haven't mentioned it.
C14E
27-08-2012
Chase and Millionaire did alright but that's a poor rating at 9pm. There was a time when ITV would just let those kinds of series "fall down the back of the couch" although I guess mid/late August is the new equivalent of that. As we head into September there should be fewer and fewer poor ratings for ITV as they start building towards the key fourth quarter.
____________

Across the pond, a few more early starts than usual. In fact, the week beginning Monday 10th September (two weeks before the proper start of the season), there's a mini season launch of sorts. The Voice premieres over Monday 10th and Tuesday 11th on NBC with new sitcoms Go On (starring Matthew Perry) and The New Normal (from Ryan Murphy) kicking off at 9pm Tuesday followed by returning series Parenthood. Then on Wednesday 12th, FOX launch season two of The X Factor USA. Second episode on Thursday with Glee premiering in its new 9pm slot immediately after.

ABC and CBS are mainly sticking to "premiere week" beginning the 24th. In fact, CBS will premiere no fewer than 21 new and returning series in that week. ABC are tending to hold back series rather than start early, most notably their hotly tipped music industry drama Nashville which is held over until 10th October (where it's likely to launch with an hour long Modern Family lead-in).

The CW, who have typically started early, have changed strategy and they'll launch new series mainly in October. Although America's Next Top Model returned last Friday.
ronant
27-08-2012
Looking like a fairy strong Strictly line up so far if you haven't seen the reports:

Spoiler
Kimberley Walsh, Sir Steve Redgrave, Victoria Pendleton, Nicky Byrne, Michael Vaughan, Paul Hollywood, Jerry Hall, Sid Owen, Fern Britton and Sian Williams.
Fudd
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by RobbieSykes123:
“Paul - when you used to post on here, before joining "the staff", you were obsessed with ITV1 and how you could make it better, posting endless fantasy schedules - for ITV1.

So you can see why folk on here get a bit uppity about your ITV1-obsessed ratings reports - I don't necessarily mean you are biased or fail to be objective, you just forget the shows on other channels that we all might be interested in. So Countryfile may well have won the day yesterday, or at least come second, but we don't know and won't do till MediaGuardian reports tomorrow, because you haven't mentioned it.”

To be fair, I'm sure ITV1 would be delighted if their ratings of late never saw the light of day.

As for Countryfile - presumably it rated close to last week. Or the week before that. Or the week before that. Or even the week before that. Or maybe the week before that. Or possibly...you get the point.
D.M.N.
27-08-2012
Re, Red or Black:

Second show last week: 3.59m (17.3%) + 0.230m (1.9%) = 3.82m (19.2%)
Second show this week: 3.70m (16.9%) + 0.177m (0.9%) = 3.88m (17.8%)

So it was a very slight increase.

Originally Posted by Fudd:
“As for Countryfile - presumably it rated close to last week. Or the week before that. Or the week before that. Or even the week before that. Or maybe the week before that. Or possibly...you get the point.”

Sorry Fudd, but by that logic we may as well ignore just about every other programme that is on every week (or every day in some cases)?
Fudd
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by D.M.N.:
“Re, Red or Black:

Second show last week: 3.59m (17.3%) + 0.230m (1.9%) = 3.82m (19.2%)
Second show this week: 3.70m (16.9%) + 0.177m (0.9%) = 3.88m (17.8%)

So it was a very slight increase.”

Both with The X Factor and Red or Black? the +1 inclusion decreased the week on week boost. It seems more people just watched the original showing.

Originally Posted by D.M.N.:
“Sorry Fudd, but by that logic we may as well ignore just about every other programme that is on every week (or every day in some cases)?”

I know, I'm sorry; it should be reported. It's just a piece of lazy scheduling which really should be looked at by the BBC in my opinion. A bit like Casualty, the channel and the show itself would be better if it was used sparingly rather than weekly filler because they can't be bothered to think of anything else to take that slot.
SamuelW
27-08-2012
How comes you dont say Coro St or Emmerdale are lazy scheduling as they're on almost every day every week of the year? Is it because Countryfile is a successful show on BBC1?
D.M.N.
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“It's just a piece of lazy scheduling which really should be looked at by the BBC in my opinion. A bit like Casualty, the channel and the show itself would be better if it was used sparingly rather than weekly filler because they can't be bothered to think of anything else to take that slot.”

When it is getting 5m to 8m all year around I can see why it is on all year around. Casualty needs it's output cut though.
Fudd
27-08-2012
Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“How comes you dont say Coro St or Emmerdale are lazy scheduling as they're on almost every day every week of the year? Is it because Countryfile is a successful show on BBC1?”

Yes, because I said EastEnders and Doctors was lazy scheduling as well, didn't I? Oh wait, I didn't...

There's a massive difference between a soap opera - which are admittedly over-exposed, especially on ITV1 - and shows from other genres which could be used more sparingly.

Just my opinion.
<<
<
47 of 127
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map