Originally Posted by compliance:
“the bottom 2 are always the bottom 2 in the vote.......it is not rigged”
“the bottom 2 are always the bottom 2 in the vote.......it is not rigged”
Nope...you're wrong there.
ITV Editing - Fran gone tomorrow
2 of 2
sorry you are wron.....the show is made by the FACTUAL department at LWT......they do it by the book.......votes are independantly verified....
Originally Posted by compliance:
“sorry you are wron.....the show is made by the FACTUAL department at LWT......they do it by the book.......votes are independantly verified....”
“sorry you are wron.....the show is made by the FACTUAL department at LWT......they do it by the book.......votes are independantly verified....”
who's wrong?
anybody want to try quoting somebody else and vice versa?
Originally Posted by dome:
“Ratings and the publicity afterwards, giving the show a high profile = money in the coffers.”
“Ratings and the publicity afterwards, giving the show a high profile = money in the coffers.”
ITV can't "fix" the votes but they can manipulate the general voting towards someone by selective editing, and in terms of who they want to win, for example who would be good on other ITV programmes like , the frank skinner show , des and mel etc, .
If ITV are to keep going with "a little help from my friends" would it suit someone like Paul (who would call on help from the princes to the corgis)
or someone like Janet , who i imagine wouldn't stoop so low to making such naff programmes? I like Joe but he's a cross between tony blacburn and tuffers, that is what the general public like , but the most useful person for ITV in future programmes is paul more than any of the others, mainly because he is polite , well mannered and will do what he's told, and probably desperate as well.
Originally Posted by rolomax:
“ITV can't "fix" the votes but they can manipulate the general voting towards someone by selective editing, and in terms of who they want to win, for example who would be good on other ITV programmes like , the frank skinner show , des and mel etc, .
If ITV are to keep going with "a little help from my friends" would it suit someone like Paul (who would call on help from the princes to the corgis) or someone like Janet , who i imagine wouldn't stoop so low to making such naff programmes? I like Joe but he's a cross between tony blacburn and tuffers, that is what the general public like , but the most useful person for ITV in future programmes is paul more than any of the others, mainly because he is polite , well mannered and will do what he's told, and probably desperate as well.”
“ITV can't "fix" the votes but they can manipulate the general voting towards someone by selective editing, and in terms of who they want to win, for example who would be good on other ITV programmes like , the frank skinner show , des and mel etc, .
If ITV are to keep going with "a little help from my friends" would it suit someone like Paul (who would call on help from the princes to the corgis)
or someone like Janet , who i imagine wouldn't stoop so low to making such naff programmes? I like Joe but he's a cross between tony blacburn and tuffers, that is what the general public like , but the most useful person for ITV in future programmes is paul more than any of the others, mainly because he is polite , well mannered and will do what he's told, and probably desperate as well.”
ITV doesn't look to see who the most bankable celeb is, as none of them are exclusive to ITV, there is no hidden agenda in their editing, they just show the most entertaining footage!
Originally Posted by compliance:
“ITV doesn't look to see who the most bankable celeb is, as none of them are exclusive to ITV, there is no hidden agenda in their editing, they just show the most entertaining footage!”
“ITV doesn't look to see who the most bankable celeb is, as none of them are exclusive to ITV, there is no hidden agenda in their editing, they just show the most entertaining footage!
”
So how come the footage that they've shown hasn't been entertaining?
I think they've been reading the threads on this forum and others on the net and have done a remarkable turnaround and gave us real entertainment for a change. I still think they'll twist the knige tomorrow though. We are all being too complacent with Paul being an easy winner.
Anyway, I honestly don't give a hoot who wins now. I just want good tv from IAC and want more of what I've seen tonight.
Originally Posted by JTW:
“.
Anyway, I honestly don't give a hoot who wins now. I just want good tv from IAC and want more of what I've seen tonight.”
“.
Anyway, I honestly don't give a hoot who wins now. I just want good tv from IAC and want more of what I've seen tonight.”
well if the celebs give good entertainment, you get good TV
2 of 2
