Originally Posted by Fudd:
“Coronation Street, EastEnders and, to a lesser extent, Emmerdale have survived years going through periods of so called 'coolness' and 'uncoolness'. A lack of hype and appeal for The X Factor has dragged it down from it's peak but killing it off is a completely different thing.”
I'm not sure the comparison with the soaps is an entirely good one. Partly because the soaps (Coronation Street and EastEnders in particular) are institutions in the way that The X Factor isn't and also because the soaps airs all year around. So whilst its certainly true that the soaps have seen periods of highs and lows both in terms of ratings and media interest that's always going to be the case when you're producing at least 2 hours a week 52 weeks of the year. It simply isn't possible to sustain highs on that kind of schedule. In contrast The X Factor is a relatively limited run that tends to have a large concentration of PR effort, time and money devoted to it.
Equally its always easy to envision a scenario in which the soaps can get people and the press interested again. There's always a big sensationalist storyline that will grab people's attention for better or for worse and there's been no sign that, that bag of tricks is empty or proving ineffective. Whereas with The X Factor we're seeing signs this year (and last) that the bag of tricks is empty and isn't working. The controversies and the like and are still there its just that people don't appear to be interested any more. It would be somewhat comparable to one of the soaps killing off a major character and nobody noticing.
Originally Posted by C14E:
“But they're not the phenomena that they once were.”
They do however still have the ability to get people talking and to grab the attention in a way that no other show on television can. For example for all the talk of a ratings crisis and a creative downturn at EastEnders over the past few years the show has still managed to stir up amazing amounts of coverage, conversation and some incredibly impressive ratings to boot. All of which suggests that as and when they find a storyline on par with things like the Richard Hilman plot or the Who Shot Phil story people will get involved.
Originally Posted by
sn_22:
“Where does this idea that Cowell is going to pull TXF the minute it fails to top the yearly TV chart come from? No offence intended, but I think it's ludicrous.
”
Its an interesting one.
I can see the argument for why Cowell would want to take the show off air before it completely runs out of steam. It protects the format for an eventual revival a few years down the line which is unlikely to happen if you run it into the ground now. There's a reason Sky were the only channel interested in a revival of Gladiators. The problem, as you mention, is that pulling the show before you've run it into the ground costs SyCo a huge amount of money over in the here and now. Its a difficult balancing act to manage.
My assumption remains that until SyCo has more than Britain's Got Talent and The X Factor up and running in the UK we're unlikely to see them pull the plug on either show. And ITV can't pull the plug on them until they're confident they have something that can replace them which they seem to be a long way off of. Had Red or Black been a hit then the landscape of SyCo would be different and I could seem them being a little more receptive to the idea of ending The X Factor especially if they had other formats on the horizon. The problem is that Red or Black wasn't a hit and they don't appear to have anything else on the horizon. The only thing I can remember hearing anything about is that terrible The X Factor for DJ's.
I think what's striking about Cowell is that he's managed to build this incredible reputation within the industry off the back of two formats, admittedly two globally successful formats, despite the fact that literally everything else he's touched has been a disaster. And arguably the two formats he does have are just variants on other successful shows anyway. Its a peculiar turn of events.
Also I'd caution against this line of thinking that as The X Factor airs in other markets where it isn't number 1 that doesn't matter. As far as I can tell Cowell has only ever been particularly invested in the UK and US versions of the show and it certainly easy to see that for him those are the two crown jewels so how the show is doing here is going to be more important to him than how it does in Australia or Germany. Does anyone really believe he micro-manages either of those versions? Could he even name the judges on them? Also there's a difference between not being number 1 and viewing figures plummeting. If a show has never been an incredible out of the park success it doesn't matter that its not now but when it has been it does matter.
Plus if The X Factor isn't getting 12+ million viewers any more ITV aren't going to want to keep paying as much for it as they do. It wouldn't make economic sense for them. As the license fee drops its easier to see SyCo pulling the plug because it becomes easier to justify it.