According to What's On TV Magazine the programme returns "after Christmas".

I must admit, it is bloody annoying when they show you what's coming up later in the show. Don't do that, it wastes time, and it's not going to make me any more or less likely to carry on watching. Just show the pitches and be done with it.

It appears Doug Richards truly is out.

Yes just hearing about this all over facebook now.

http://news.sky.com/story/1548274/tv...d-sex-offences

Not sure if this is the second half of the series or a repeat?

Woman trying to sell a product that prevents grey hair tested in China. Can't believe she's attempted to flog this to them.

This is a new episode, the 2nd half of the series.

It gets better. She didn't come up with the formula herself.. she paid a firm in China about £40k to come up with it.. test it.. and bottle it. She's been had.

New episode.

If it was genuine everyone would be biting her hand off to get it.

And it doesn't work.

what a flipping con this is

not only "ethically tested" by a chinese company, which quite frankly couldn't spell the word, but SHE is the marketer as the manufacturer franchises out that part ..... because they are CHEAPSKATES!!!

bugger off woman

The moment they announced what the product was at the very beginning, I said it was a load of cobblers. If it worked, it would have been front page news on every newspaper around the world and would have taken the world by storm. The animal testing is just the icing on the cake....

Another dating app?

oh look a dating app

one
two
four
twenty
THAT SAME THING

bye

The only things that wouldn't be tested on animals are things that have already been tested on animals by somebody else and they are just reusing the same/similar "formula".

Sounds too complicated to me. So the two men would have to find two women they're interested in.. but who are already tagged together as a "couple" ... wouldn't that dramatically reduce the odds of finding a compatible double match? Or are they aiming for at least one couple per date where the other two effectively just tagged along on the chance they'd get on with the other person?

4.5 million users in year 3.. that doesn't sound like a very successful "hit" rate for pairing people up who would then stop using the site.

Credit to Sarah she always manages to be original with her rejections.

Which must be a challenge since it happens every time.

They haven't told us how many man hours of development were needed and thus how easily it can be replicated.

lol.

She does have a point.. double dates would be notorious for friendship friction if both girls want to go for the same bloke.. or vice versa!

I'm actually surprised Apple haven't already built something like this into the iPhone.

"NFC is an Internet connection". No it's not.

He said "needs an internet connection" I believe. Not sure if that's true either but that's what he said.

nope
it simply requires one
good idea
but it's another private company for public services to buy into

PASS

Surely the obvious solution here is Apple (and Android) build in an identification app into their OS that sits on the phone with your medical details, contact details etc.. and a paramedic can hold a device near the phone and read that information. That would be such a hugely beneficial application surely. As long as it was secure of course.

Nope. NFC is simply peer-to-peer radio communications, passing data from one device to another.