Take a look

One's a ginger-haired girl.

The other's a dark-haired boy.

They couldn't be... Could they?

Amy and Rory?!

Wow. Mind = blown

Aaaaaargh! Like it isn't complicated enough!

But is Caitlin Blackwood there?

The girl even has lights on her bed like Amy..

That would have been some hell of a forward plan by The Moff if it's true!

Didn't he recently say he always knew what their final scene would be? Would suggest a link to the past.

( Moffat lies... Yadyada.. )

That is almost .... shocking ....

The only thing that makes me doubt it is when Moffat recently said that he'd changed the ending after writing the first draft (or something like that). Also is it tooooo clever for the audience to get? I mean, it was in 2008!!!

Whatever, I'm suddenly even more excited about Episode 5!

It couldn't *be* them, short of yet more massively timey-wimey nonsense to explain why River still exists.. disembodied or not.

But an interesting fantasy of River's perhaps - her children that resemble her parents.

Thank heavens for that. I thought you were going to say "The Rani and The Master?!" for a moment.

1.33

Bugger. You're right - probably too esoteric a reference to expect it to turn up as a major plot point now.

I always thought it was interesting that River had 3 beds when everyone else who was saved had the same 2 children. Could the 3rd one be little Melody?

But I think they could just be River's children with the Doctor.

I thought the children were Donna's "children", maybe I haven't remembered the episode correctly.

The Third Child is Cal.

As to the other two being Amy and Rory I seriously doubt it.

Unless of course it turns out Moffat only auditioned red heads for the part of Amy.


They were Donna's children but they were also the children of the thousands of other parents saved on the computer.

To save memory the Computer just used the same two templates for every child born in the virtual world.

Yeah, It's kind of like on old computer games where you pass the same bystander every two minutes.

Just watched

there are 3 beds, 3 kids, and also, surely "amy" would be played by little amelia pond?

Ooer missus.

I would put nothing past S Moffat.



NOOOOO! Rani and Monk please!
(I don't ever want to see the Master again).

Yeah I think I got too excited haha.

It's probably not them. And someone else pointed out too that they were Donna's kids, I'd forgotten that.

Obviously they must be the Master and Omega.... *dances off*

What about Chancellor Flavia and Commander Maxil?

It's extremely unlikely that these children were created as little Amy and Rory. However, Moffat could always return to this scene and now have them as Amy and Rory, this time having Caitlin Blackwood playing her. Although, I doubt this will happen.

Very interesting theory, however.

Brilliant theory, though maybe a bit too out there to be true. Although...maybe the new 'cherub' angles not only send back in time but turn them into children again? Maybe...maybe not.

I can REALLY see this happening - with "Amy" ending up as "Amelia" again

And would possibly explain the 'issued 1990' badge. Hmmmm.

I doubt it - but only because it would effectively have Rory and her marriage wiped out.

I said last year that we haven't finished with 11th Hour yet - and I still stand by that - but not as something that will take everything that's happened to her away.

Apart from the "theft" of the life she's lead, you'd have a serious problem with taking her back to the beginning because there are specific events - including at least one major fixed-point - that would be affected. It's only because of the adult Amy travelling with the Doctor in the Tardis that we have River Song - and she has to exist to kill the Doctor - and she has to have that "Time Lord" ability for that to happen. In many ways, Amy has become a fixed-point in her own right (though that has always been the biggest flaw with fixed-point - they require a chain of events preceding them).