Have Panasonic let their standards slide? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Services: Freeview, Sky, TalkTalk, Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 and a Nexus 4.
Posts: 1,075
|
Have Panasonic let their standards slide?
http://reviews.cnet.com/flat-panel-t...5312753-1.html
I know, this is a Cnet review but I've never seen a negative Panasonic TV review to date. This might be a sign they are trying to cut costs and compete with their rivals. I know it's a budget low-end TV but even Toshiba's TV bested this one in nearly every aspect. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 34,225
|
What relevance has it here?, it's a USA site and models, they are completely different to sets in Europe - the market is entirely different.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Services: Freeview, Sky, TalkTalk, Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 and a Nexus 4.
Posts: 1,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,790
|
Panasonic's (and Sony's) consumer electronics wings are losing money hand over fist -- building quality simply isn't viable any more.
These two will either reduce their own standards, buy in from others (whilst maybe continuing their higher-spec stuff) or bow out within the next couple of years, just as every other manufacturer has. Cheap-end quality is adequate for what most (non-enthusiast) people want -- which is either a watchable picture through Freeview, or a decent picture through an HD STB, for a period not generally exceeding three years. Most Vestels reach three years old without trouble; all Vestels have a watchable (not great, but adequate for most people) image through Freeview (and adequate doesn't mean a huge amount -- a good 50% of those viewers will still be watching 4:3 cropped and stretched to 16:9); all Vestels have actually pretty good pictures through a (for example) Sky HD box. For Vestel, substitute Samsung, LG, TCL, TPV, UMC, and pretty much anything else. You have to bear in mind that these are the same people who turned their backs on the mainstream hifi manufacturers and now think a 128kbps MP3 file played through a DMP with the cheapest DAC chipset available is "high quality". |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 34,225
|
Quote:
It's quite plausible that the Panasonic reviewed is just a cheap badged set, but it also depends on the accuracy of the review, most of which I tend to find highly dubious at best. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Services: Freeview, Sky, TalkTalk, Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 and a Nexus 4.
Posts: 1,075
|
Quote:
hdtvtest.co.uk seems to be the most accurate site. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:21.



