Originally Posted by stillrockin:
“Hi Gwenllian
You have in your second paragraph answered the question I think. They are possibly not in this for the long haul but just to pick up as much cash as possible at this moment in time. This therefore makes them a novelty and not a long term serious music prospect.
I thought the purpose of the show was to try and find an artist who would not only sell in the short term but with the prospect of remaining in the industry for more than the statutory 12 months, which seems usual following these types of shows.
I cannot see G4s musical direction and nor it seems can even the most avid G4 supporters. No one has put forward a suggestion as to where this concept is going in the long term - one poster did admit that they had no idea.
Perhaps they will flit in and out of other artists albums doing the odd collaboration. They need to know where they are going or else they will fall prey to the manipulation of the record company.
I am not anti G4 or any of the other finalists. I have tried to look at each one individually and see if they match up to the various criteria which might form part of having the xfactor. G4 have been lauded for their vocal ability but they are lacking in other areas IMO.
If they win tomorrow they will be the most popular on the night which will mean absolutely nothing this time next year.
.”
I wonder why you are so obsessed with the future. I agree that for Steve this is a last ditch attempt at making it and good for him, I like him and I hope he does.
However, whenever a group form who knows how long they will last or what their intentions are, I certainly don't. I can only guess ,and to me in the worst case scenario, ie that support for G4 doesn't last long, they will have long careers elsewhere in the music industry. I can't see them turning out as bus drivers or plumbers or accounants thats for sure.
In my opinion they have fantastic talent and a good education individually so I am convinced they will be fine long term.
I find it irritating that first of all they are slated for not having longevity in the industry (more crystal ball stuff) but when the critics are answered with common sense replies as to what is likely to happen to G4 if they don't stay together, that is wrong too.
Obviously in some people's eyes they can't win whatever so its best we just dont bother to argue on it.
Neither you nor me can see into the future so its pretty stupid trying to argue about it, don't you think?