Ok i wasnt gonna post, but i just wanted to say something (ironically enough) in defence and support of the winners;
Jill isnt a professional, she took lessons as a child. Would anyone say Denise and Roger had an unfair advantage because of their superior cardio vascular capacity? I'm sure that is certainly more of a virtue than taking lessons as a 6 yr old...
Ok, and as for that 40, when they first did that dance i happened to be flicking thru tv and was, well, transfixed. Utterly blown away by how amazing Jill's dancing was, and tonight they topped their first performance. The whole point of the show is that ANY dance, be it jive foxtrot or waltz can potentially get 40. And in the judges opinion, and my own albeit limited in term of reference, they couldnt have produced a better jive. THAT's the whole point, about taking the dance, the choreography and the execution as far as possible. Everything was spot on, and well, if EVERYTHING is spot on, and nothing can be faultered, it's danced as well as that particular choreography can be danced and nothing is missing, then what it amounts to is a 10... think about it, if all that amounted to a 9, then what's the point in having 10?
I think Denise summed it up when she said "the better dancers won", very gracious in her not winning (because she was hardly defeated), but (and again i speak from a somewhat ignorant perspective) I do honestly think that Jill's actual execution and steps and stuff on teh floor were better than some of the professional girls...
BTW, how many votes were cast tonight? and on x factor?