The Walking Dead was down in its second outing of season 3 on AMC but its 5.1 rating among adults 18-49 topped all non sport broadcast competition not just on the night but for the week beating The Voice, The Big Bang Theory and Modern Family. Compared to the premiere it was down 12% in the key demo and scored 9.5m total viewers. About 68% of the audience were aged 18-49.
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“The BBC is bigger than the people who run it. If need be, everyone will be moved or sacked and new people installed. The corporation should not and can not be held accountable for the decisions of the suits within.”
It's damaging to the brand - just like the phone hacking thing was damaging to News Corp (even Sky got mentioned a lot in relation to it all).
If phone hacking was the MP's revenge on the press for the expenses scandal then this will surely be revenge for the press against the "squeaky clean" TV media. And from a PR perspective, I know I'd far rather be accused of covering up phone hacking than child molesting. The BBC isn't quite the bogey man target that News Corp was (largely because of the Murdoch name) but the subject at hand is far more emotive than phone hacking.
But I highly doubt it will damage the ratings. AFAIK tabloid circulation hasn't plummeted anymore than usual since the phone hacking scandal (nor is The Guardian performing any better).
Originally Posted by Agent F:
“The virtues of the BBC can be found in the fact that this Panorama investigation into the practices of BBC aired... on the BBC. No other corporation would put itself under such scrutiny.”
It's also PR 101. Once you're caught, lay it all out on the table. Find everything terrible that could be used against you and put it all out on one day at the same time. Ideally after about a week or so your PR firm would create a diversion - like a well known name eating a hamster, for example (although given recent allegations, you might want to change the person in question!).
With the impending investigations the details will be exposed now. Best to put it out on your own terms rather than a constant drip drip of information and scandal which drags on over months and years as rivals expose the dirty details. It's ironic that News Corp failed so miserably on this front. Although I guess for a while they were trying to stave off investigations and in doing so dug themselves a deeper hole when Leveson came around.
Originally Posted by
cylon6:
“Well that caught a few TV critics off guard who thought it was going.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/liv...r-third-381635”
Not one credible source ever discussed it as a cancellation prospect for the simple reason that it was never at any risk. Bravo I guess to The Examiner for getting some attention but it's considerably less reliable than The Daily Star.
Originally Posted by danisfunny:
“ABC
America's Funniest Home Videos - 1.3 (5.93m)
Once Upon a Time - 3.3 (9.71m)
Revenge - 2.8 (8.65m)
666 Park Avenue - 1.8 (4.93m)”
IMO that's not an awful night. 666 Park added three tenths and looks a lot healthier than last week. It's still low and only ties Pan Am's performance last year but Pan Am came off a far higher base and kept falling IIRC.
Revenge is pretty much on a par with Desperate Housewives. Once Upon A Time doing good business at 8pm. Without those two hits last season, they could be in a terrible mess on Sundays just now. All they need to do next is find a new tentpole reality series to replace DWTS, at least a couple of stronger 10pm series, at least one more sitcom and end the Thursday 8pm curse... so not a lot then!
Wednesday was a real disappointment last week. Nashville was the big hope in drama but fell sharply. And I thought Suburgatory would hit a 3 out of Modern Family. They really needed to keep adding hits and they've just not delivered so far this season.
Originally Posted by Jonwo:
“With the news of Jeff Ford leaving Channel 5, he's did a good job at Channel 5 to helm it during a period of change but I think new blood could give it the kick it needs.Wonder who they will be looking for?”
Alison Sharman? OK Daybreak goes against her a bit but with stuff like The Lakes and Paul O'Grady: For The Love of Dogs she has put some hits in the tough "anti-Eastenders" slot. With The Chase and Piers Morgan's Life Stories she has commissioned more entertainment hits than the director of entertainment! Long Lost Family was also from her department. Was mentioned as a successor to Fincham when he leaves ITV.
Angela Jain is running all ITV's digital channels and acquisitions. Not hugely impressed so far to be honest but she had a really good run at E4 (she pushed it ahead of C5 in 16-34's), worked at C5 in the past and was Commissioning Editor for years on Big Brother. Background in factual entertainment (although while running E4 it was scripted stuff that defined the channel).
Simon Dickson is Creative Director at Dragonfly TV where he has produced The Hotel and The Plane Crash. Previously Deputy Head of Documentaries at Channel 4 where he commissioned One Born Every Minute, Coppers and 24 Hours in A&E.
Given what they do, it would seem to make sense that they go for someone that knows popular fact ent and maybe acquisitions. Whether or not any of the three above would move is a question way beyond my guessing.