Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Up a tree, Howling at the moon
Services: All being cut by The Coalition
Posts: 35
|
Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox?
I like Internet Explorer 9 but I'm finding it increasingly buggy and unstable and quite a few websites don't seem to display properly also I'm finding I trust it less for security reasons.
Many people here on Digital Spy seem to advocate switching to Chrome or Firefox so which is best for speed, security, and general usability? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,389
|
I used to favour Firefox but now use Chrome as my default but have Pale Moon (based on Firefox source) as backup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Up a tree, Howling at the moon
Services: All being cut by The Coalition
Posts: 35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,331
|
Quote:
Security and general usability, probably Firefox. I use Firefox myself but best to try them both and see which you like. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Services: Virgin BB, Phone, Telly, Mobile
Posts: 4,024
|
If it's just between Chrome and Firefox, then Chrome. It's more stable and faster imo (although Firefox has a lot more extensions if that's what you're after). Personally though I use Opera as my default because I find it quicker, more stable and easier to customise than the others..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,479
|
Quote:
Security - not much difference. All browsers have regular security vulnerabilities. It's just a question of how quickly they're patched. IE is generally slowest to do so. Usability - subjective but I personally prefer Firefox. If you're used to IE you might find Firefox a little less alien. I'd say try both and see how you get on. Overall, it's subjective and you'll see passionate advocates for both Chrome and Firefox here. Possibly you might see some Opera fans too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 274
|
Ebeneezer Goode
Firefox is not really in favour, it's just that users of Firefox/Anti MS brigade are often more persistant and annoying. To have 2 Browsers installed means reduced security for the simple reasons of having 2 Browsers to maintain. Does not matter which ones they are. I have Chrome as a second Browser to IE now, Firefox has been dropped as I found it too buggy, likewise Opera, Safari, and years ago Netscape, Mozilla. Browser Speed is really a non issue now. Internet Download Speed is far more to the point. To find out you install an alternative Web Browser and assess it yourself for useability. This is by far the best way. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,479
|
Firefox is my favourite browser but not because I'm anti-MS (I use and like Microsoft development tools, for example). I simply find Firefox has better functionality and usability. If, further down the line I find that Microsoft offers this (or anything else) I will switch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,643
|
For windows pc i'd rate very highly pale moon compared to Firefox easily these days ,my default browser and IE as back up .
Palemoon Optimized for your individual set up/graphic's /ram ect and up to speed with FF update/version wise 15.1.1. ,also run memoryfox add-on as well and constantly squeezes last drop of juice from windows OS |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Services: ......
Posts: 44,791
|
Install both and see which one you prefer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South Wales/Gran Canaria
Services: Freeview, Sky, Talktalk FTTC 74.5mb/s i7PC W8, Netflix, Lovefilm, YouView
Posts: 5,929
|
Install both, I have and run both at the same time sometimes with no issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,050
|
well having multiple browsers installed I'd say the only one that struggles is ie9 .... the rest all have their + & - as far as functionality goes and with me they all run @ much the same kind of speed ... stick with firefox as main browser, then opera, then comodo dragon, .... suspect many speed problems are either low spec hardware, just start up time of browser or perhaps user perception/impatience .. along with perhaps slight software incompatibility glitches from other things installed.
Stick with firefox due to greater functionality & scope for customisation through addons ... a light user might be perfectly happy with chrome but not me! anyone else remember netscape navigator 1.0? |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Services: LG LCD IDTV; Tacolneston TX; Virgin Media ADSL
Posts: 10,883
|
Some web sites are better on one, some on the other. Install both. Keeping them both up-to-date is a trivial task, keeping their add-ons/plug-ins/extensions up-to-date a bit more laborious but not really an issue.
Chrome is a good browser but IMHO it suffers from having a bizarre non-standard minimalist user interface which is a pain. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,050
|
have to agree & same applies to ie9 ... too minimalist for use on pc's for all but light & corportate (locked down) users ... OK for tablets though
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Essex
Services: too many
Posts: 13,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Services: LG LCD IDTV; Tacolneston TX; Virgin Media ADSL
Posts: 10,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,479
|
Quote:
Personally I think minimalist UIs are overrated but I don't mind them provided that I can still get adequate configurability. In Chrome this is not the case. But most Chrome users are fine with this. It all depends how you browse. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Under your bed...
Services: VM
Posts: 12,004
|
I use both, as sometimes my FF doesn't run some sites due to all the plugins I've installed in an attempt to keep the computer safe. At that point I switch over to Chrome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 4,268
|
wut? Not true at all. Modern sites are so JS heavy that browser speed is more important that ever. Downloading a few hundred KBs over most home broadband is virtually signification compared with building complex DOMs and loading additional resources.
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 4,268
|
Quote:
Also, if you have one installed that's out of date, is not the default and you never run that is not going to harm security. |
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:20.




