DS Forums

 
 

Corries Ruby and EE's Lexi


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-10-2012, 21:22
nicolab23
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 240

Why is it that in Corrie, Tyrone has no parental right over Ruby as the father is listed as unknown on her birth certificate? I assume that Lola followed a similar route and also left the name of Lexi's father blank but it is being suggested that Phil (not even the baby's father) will be granted custody.

I dearly hope that the threads suggesting that Phil will be granted custody are just speculation because otherwise, EE will again be making a mockery of the social services system
nicolab23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 08-10-2012, 21:32
Sora2311
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,013
Who said she didn't put Bens name dow?
Sora2311 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 21:37
nicolab23
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 240
I'm purely speculating but to put the fathers name on the birth certificate he would have to be there and I very much doubt a psychotic youth llike Ben would be that reliable

I stand corrected if I am wrong though
nicolab23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 21:37
rapunzel4
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: glasgow
Posts: 952
of course she couldnt. u cant just walk in and name anyone

'oh yeah, father -david beckham'

they either have to be married or he has to be present
rapunzel4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 21:45
nicolab23
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 240
of course she couldnt. u cant just walk in and name anyone

'oh yeah, father -david beckham'

they either have to be married or he has to be present
Thanks rapunzel4, that's what I meant
I was speculating about Ben's name actually being on the certificate
nicolab23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 21:51
rapunzel4
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: glasgow
Posts: 952
it will be ridiculous if phil gets lexi tho, an ex crack addict and alcoholic with many convictions

surely they would see she is better with billy and lola?!
rapunzel4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 22:03
Harlowe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,370
I think that the name can be added later and Tyrone would have to get a DNA test to confirm his the father which will allow him to fight to have his name on the birth certificate I think.
Harlowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 22:05
CherryRose
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: #EE#TheCarters
Posts: 11,310
Why is it that in Corrie, Tyrone has no parental right over Ruby as the father is listed as unknown on her birth certificate? I assume that Lola followed a similar route and also left the name of Lexi's father blank but it is being suggested that Phil (not even the baby's father) will be granted custody.

I dearly hope that the threads suggesting that Phil will be granted custody are just speculation because otherwise, EE will again be making a mockery of the social services system
Coronation Street are the ones giving false information. Tyrone could get rights over Ruby, he could have gone to see a solicitor to get proof of parentage and prevent Kirsty from taking off Ruby with a PSO.
CherryRose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 22:05
nicolab23
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 240
But this is Phil Mitchell, and ridiculously, what Phil wants Phil gets. Think it'd be a very disturbing storyline if it's true.

I think to get a fathers name added, the man in question would have to adopt the child? And I'm not sure Ben is a candidate to do so, but of course poor Tyrone could
nicolab23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 22:06
CherryRose
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: #EE#TheCarters
Posts: 11,310
it will be ridiculous if phil gets lexi tho, an ex crack addict and alcoholic with many convictions

surely they would see she is better with billy and lola?!
What exactly has Phil been convicted of?
CherryRose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 22:11
rapunzel4
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: glasgow
Posts: 952
hasnt he done time?

i think stuff to do with dodgy cars/ mots. he should also have been done with arson and several gbh's but since this is eastenders, lets just overlook those minor misdemeanors
rapunzel4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 22:18
klendathu
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 10,726
What exactly has Phil been convicted of?
It's not just about actual convictions , they would do an enhanced CRB check that would show every single arrest , caution and warning . You don't have to be actually convicted to be barred from certain things .
For example I know someone who received just a simple caution but this prevents him from doing the job he wants due to an enhanced check .
Phil is well known to the police and would be extremely unlikely to get Lexi in real life
klendathu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 22:38
CherryRose
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: #EE#TheCarters
Posts: 11,310
It's not just about actual convictions , they would do an enhanced CRB check that would show every single arrest , caution and warning . You don't have to be actually convicted to be barred from certain things .
For example I know someone who received just a simple caution but this prevents him from doing the job he wants due to an enhanced check .
Phil is well known to the police and would be extremely unlikely to get Lexi in real life
Enhanced CRB checks do not reveal all arrests at all!

They reveal cautions and convictions and list any areas which you are banned from working in.

The officer dealing with the CRB check can choose to leave comments but they'd have to have the legal grounds to so.

The custody or residence order would be held in a court of law and unfound and unproved accusations (unless it was abuse) would not be able to be used against Phil. The fact is there is no legal reason why Phil can not apply for residence of Lexi, a court might like to see Phil in a more stable home life.

In the real world Lexi would not have been removed from Lolas care because there were no grounds to do so.
CherryRose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 22:41
nicolab23
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 240
I'm hoping that there is no evidence of paternity. That surely would prevent him even suggesting it
nicolab23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2012, 22:43
CherryRose
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: #EE#TheCarters
Posts: 11,310
I'm hoping that there is no evidence of paternity. That surely would prevent him even suggesting it
Since Lola is going to the one pushing for Phil to help her, Phil could actully help prove parentage. A DNA test could prove if Phil was close relation of Lexis.
CherryRose is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:24.