Originally Posted by wavejockglw:
“Oh dear..... the hidden motive theory!”
Hey, it's possible
Originally Posted by wavejockglw:
“My latest contract is a bit of a hit and hope, costs next to nothing but its annoying that some folks insist that 3's product is now fabulous and trouble free when where I reside its anything but.”
As I stated before wavelockglw, down here it's fine. I even admitted I had problems when in Scotland, but not the rest of the UK.
I listed the places I had travelled to recently in England and Wales that had no problems at all. I also stated that the motorways were also fine for me too.
You then stated that Three use different technology in Scotland and I suggested at the time that maybe the problems you mention are Scotland specific?
It certainly seems this way.
If this is the case then maybe it's unfair to brand Three with such a bad set of posts?
Like I said in the past, Voda is crap around my area and almost useless, but I don't slag them off as I accept they don't cover here to well. In Scotland I could use T Mobile fine, but Three was pants. Again I accept that T Mobile cover Scotland well, but Three don't.
All networks in the UK have different areas that they cover better than others and it would appear that Three cover England (and the parts of Wales that I was in recently) better than Scotland at the moment.
Three is an excellent service as far as I and the other England dwelling people that I know are concerned (we are all over England), but if I was in Scotland then maybe my view would be different. Ms Lalaland's family mainly come from Scotland and we will be up there again during some point of the January / February so I will test Three again and see if any thing's changed.