DS Forums

 
 

EastEnders- Lola, Phil and Sharon in Court- Spoiler Pictures


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18-10-2012, 11:56
lawsj123
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 931

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...-for-Lexi.html

EASTENDERS hardman Phil Mitchell and his ex Sharon Rickman look thrilled as they leave court after battling for baby Lexi – but the little girl’s mum Lola is left devastated.

Phil (played by Steve McFadden) has been pushing for custody of Lexi since finding out she is his son Ben’s daughter – making Phil her grandad.

He ropes in former flame Sharon (Letitia Dean) to help him, and the pair look chuffed as they and their lawyer parade out of the hearing about residency for Lexi.

But poor Lola (Danielle Harold), who saw Lexi taken into care after she was accused of assault, is left distraught.

An insider said: “Phil has been pushing for full custody ever since he found out he was Lexi’s grandad.

“He has been pretty lonely since the rest of his family deserted him and sees Lexi as a new start.

“He has remained close to Sharon and she helps him with his plan.

“But Lola is left miserable after begging to be allowed to take Lexi home herself.”
lawsj123 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 18-10-2012, 12:08
los.kav
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,824
See, this whole thing is annoying me. Would over-protective-mother Sharon really conspire to take a baby away from its mum? If the answer is "Yes, that's always been her character", then that's a pretty terrible character. I mean, Phil has always been that heartless, but Sharon? Hmm.
los.kav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 12:46
Bathsheba
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North East England
Posts: 6,289
Horrible story, worse than Kat's affair in my opinion. I hate Philth.
Bathsheba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 12:52
monalisa62003
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N.Ireland!
Posts: 42,119
Omg shirley to the rescue!!
monalisa62003 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 12:54
priscilla
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: God didn't do this, devil did
Posts: 28,118
See, this whole thing is annoying me. Would over-protective-mother Sharon really conspire to take a baby away from its mum? If the answer is "Yes, that's always been her character", then that's a pretty terrible character. I mean, Phil has always been that heartless, but Sharon? Hmm.
Exactly, we've seen how she is with Dennis and must understand that mother/child bond I dont think Sharon would try and break that up. She knows how Phil is thats why she doesnt let Denny get to close again Sharon not an evil witch who would do that to anothet child.
Sharon would help get Lexi back, but also tell Phil to let Lola have custody.
Why the hell would ex alcohol/cocaine addict Phil get full custody, and his violent (we all know Phil alcohol problems come and go etc).
Lexi should be with Lola.
priscilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 12:58
tenchgirl
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hither & Yon
Posts: 10,967
EE go one further than scraping the bottom of the barrel, they turn it upside down and scrape the underneath.

Between kat, Sharon & Phil, im rapidly going right off EE.

As if any court would give Mitchell that baby when he's own parenting skills result in raising a psycho murderer.
tenchgirl is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 12:59
Filiman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Walford/TARDIS
Posts: 8,620
Exactly, we've seen how she is with Dennis and must understand that mother/child bond I dont think Sharon would try and break that up. She knows how Phil is thats why she doesnt let Denny get to close again Sharon not an evil witch who would do that to anothet child.
Sharon would help get Lexi back, but also tell Phil to let Lola have custody.
Why the hell would ex alcohol/cocaine addict Phil get full custody, and his violent (we all know Phil alcohol problems come and go etc).
Lexi should be with Lola.
I imagine she's under the impression that this is being done FOR Lola - ie: Lola won't get her child back so phil is going to try and get custody; Lola and lexi will live with him and she will raise the child.

That's how I expect the idea to be sold to Sharon (with phil undoubtedly keeping to himself that this is less for Lola than for him).
Filiman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 13:06
priscilla
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: God didn't do this, devil did
Posts: 28,118
I imagine she's under the impression that this is being done FOR Lola - ie: Lola won't get her child back so phil is going to try and get custody; Lola and lexi will live with him and she will raise the child.

That's how I expect the idea to be sold to Sharon (with phil undoubtedly keeping to himself that this is less for Lola than for him).
Oh now it makes sense, hopefully the writers write it like that otherwise it just seems out of character for Sharon.
Arghh I want Phil to pay, although a great character his never been truly punished.
Poor Lola This ep going to emotional it will probably be like the ep Lexi got taken away.
priscilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 13:10
Harlowe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,370
Would they even grant someone like him custody?

Is the lawyer guy in the pic the one who helped Roxy?
Harlowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 13:33
vald
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 31,001
If Sharon is manipulated by Phil to go along with this I hope she goes all out to put it right when she finds out.
vald is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 13:49
monalisa62003
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N.Ireland!
Posts: 42,119
If Sharon is manipulated by Phil to go along with this I hope she goes all out to put it right when she finds out.
Noo shirley will do that
monalisa62003 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 13:57
priscilla
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: God didn't do this, devil did
Posts: 28,118
If Sharon is manipulated by Phil to go along with this I hope she goes all out to put it right when she finds out.
Same.

I think the guy is the one who helped Roxy, his called Jimmy and works for Ritchie.
priscilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 14:01
vald
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 31,001
Noo shirley will do that
I can see Shirley, Jay and Billy fighting for Lola and Lexi, but as Sharon's the one who lies to the court she needs to own up when she realizes Phil's plan.
vald is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 14:05
NeutronstarNeko
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,839
I imagine she's under the impression that this is being done FOR Lola - ie: Lola won't get her child back so phil is going to try and get custody; Lola and lexi will live with him and she will raise the child.

That's how I expect the idea to be sold to Sharon (with phil undoubtedly keeping to himself that this is less for Lola than for him).
In addition I would guess Phil says something along the lines that she owes him, she turned up on his door and he dropped everything and rescued her, gave her a job etc so now he is asking for help in return, so Sharon will feel like she cant say no.

I wonder if we will get a Xmas day reunion for Lola and Lexi or if it will continue in to 2013?
NeutronstarNeko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 14:05
monalisa62003
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N.Ireland!
Posts: 42,119
I can see Shirley, Jay and Billy fighting for Lola and Lexi, but as Sharon's the one who lies to the court she needs to own up when she realizes Phil's plan.
I think in the end shirley will be the one to persuade phil to let lola live with them, im sure sharon knows by the time of the court that phil isnt intending in letting lola live with them
monalisa62003 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 14:06
Filiman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Walford/TARDIS
Posts: 8,620
I can see Shirley, Jay and Billy fighting for Lola and Lexi, but as Sharon's the one who lies to the court she needs to own up when she realizes Phil's plan.
Because Shirley is such a moral character. What rubbish; a women who deliberately a knowingly steals money from a single mother is hardly going to do right by another single mother.

She has done nothing to make it right with roxy; and thanks to Shirley, Amy has had an insecure childhood.

Pathetic.
Filiman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 14:15
priscilla
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: God didn't do this, devil did
Posts: 28,118
Because Shirley is such a moral character. What rubbish; a women who deliberately a knowingly steals money from a single mother is hardly going to do right by another single mother.

She has done nothing to make it right with roxy; and thanks to Shirley, Amy has had an insecure childhood.

Pathetic.
So true. Though if she does help, in my opinion she'll be slightly redeemed also if she grasses Phil up.
I like Shirley but I think she been slightly ruined for the Hev stuff and just for being Phils doormat.
priscilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 14:52
Mattehhhftw
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,687
I actually like this storyline
Mattehhhftw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 14:52
vald
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 31,001
Because Shirley is such a moral character. What rubbish; a women who deliberately a knowingly steals money from a single mother is hardly going to do right by another single mother.

She has done nothing to make it right with roxy; and thanks to Shirley, Amy has had an insecure childhood.

Pathetic.
Stealing Roxy's money was wrong but it was just £30,000 out of £3.5 million, which Roxy managed to squander. Besides Phil got Masood to put it back to frame Glenda for the theft and paid for Roxy's defence when Jack tried for custody of Ami....so they're square IMO.
vald is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 15:01
AngelicPrincess
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
I am loving Sharon's hair now. It is how the actress wears it now and suits her. But wait a minute did Sharon not offer money to Vicki? And although the baby should be with Lexi and the social in real life would have never removed her she is not some saintly mother. For some reason she keepings committing crimes even when she does not need too. She was told to take her baby to the doctor for some bizarre refused to do so and stole bum cream? When had she taken the baby to the doctor not only would she had been given practical advice but prescribed the best cream for what her baby needed free. And Billy is not some saint either people forget he is a child abuser every bit as much as Phil. But I am going to see how this pans out before I pass judgement. But being a Billy, Phil and Sharon fan I am really plesaed to see them all invovled in a storyline together.
AngelicPrincess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 15:02
priscilla
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: God didn't do this, devil did
Posts: 28,118
Stealing Roxy's money was wrong but it was just £30,000 out of £3.5 million, which Roxy managed to squander. Besides Phil got Masood to put it back to frame Glenda for the theft and paid for Roxy's defence when Jack tried for custody of Ami....so they're square IMO.
Phil paid for the lawyer not Shirley.
Shirley as a mother who wanted to rebuild her relationship with her kids should have known how Glenda felt of being accused.
Though Glenda did cheat with Phil, only she punished Glenda but let off Phil like she always does.
priscilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 15:09
AngelicPrincess
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,110
Stealing from a single mother and allowing her to live in your house before stiching her mother up makes you scum. She was giggling about it as a I recall on a bed. Walking out on 3 children, one of whom you know is very ill makes you scum. Sheding more tears over your man then your childs death makes you scum. Treating your so called best mate as a 2nd class ciizen especially when you know they have self confidence issues makes you scum. Protecting the man who covered up your best friends murder, lying to the police to cover for him, allowing him to let you find the body and leaving George all that time alone with his dead mother makes you scum. Then allowing Ben and Jay to take the fall but not him makes you scum.

Please tell me even if Sharon is fully aware how she is worse?

Shirley has nothing to do with his story. I think there is some delusions if they think Sharon wont get with Phil for real and Shirley wont threaten that. Why get invovled at all? Just to piss on Heather's memory even more? Nope it will be Jack whos the 3rd wheel and they will try to make him likeable again by being the victim in all this.
AngelicPrincess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 16:15
vald
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 31,001
Phil paid for the lawyer not Shirley.
Shirley as a mother who wanted to rebuild her relationship with her kids should have known how Glenda felt of being accused.
Though Glenda did cheat with Phil, only she punished Glenda but let off Phil like she always does.
I was more pointing out that it was not Shirley's fault that Ami had an insecure childhood, it was down to Roxy's mismanagement of her businesses and money.

Weren't Glenda and her son planning to steal from Roxy ?

BIB Phil gets away with too much...let's hope Shirley has woken up since being with her daughter and grandson. She's made endless mistakes in her life.

TBH I don't care who thwarts Phil's plans as long as someone does.
vald is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 16:24
monalisa62003
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: N.Ireland!
Posts: 42,119
So true. Though if she does help, in my opinion she'll be slightly redeemed also if she grasses Phil up.
I like Shirley but I think she been slightly ruined for the Hev stuff and just for being Phils doormat.
What has she done wrong? She got stuck in between two people she loved. Its not like she enjoyed it, she lived on the streets for a few weeks. Shes lost more than phil has and she never did anything wrong phils the one who needs redeemed and it doesnt even look like sharon does this
Phil paid for the lawyer not Shirley.
Shirley as a mother who wanted to rebuild her relationship with her kids should have known how Glenda felt of being accused.
Though Glenda did cheat with Phil, only she punished Glenda but let off Phil like she always does.
she never let phil get away with glenda she caused more harm with rainie and lied to phil about ben being his stalker which ultimately cost phil to loose everything,

The only thing shirley needs to do is make phils life hell
monalisa62003 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 18-10-2012, 16:27
priscilla
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: God didn't do this, devil did
Posts: 28,118
I was more pointing out that it was not Shirley's fault that Ami had an insecure childhood, it was down to Roxy's mismanagement of her businesses and money.

Weren't Glenda and her son planning to steal from Roxy ?

BIB Phil gets away with too much...let's hope Shirley has woken up since being with her daughter and grandson. She's made endless mistakes in her life.

TBH I don't care who thwarts Phil's plans as long as someone does.
oh sorry Roxy and money dont go well together.
Yes Glenda was planning to steal money, but after bonding I think her intentions changed.

Yes Phil needs to get his comeuppance.
priscilla is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:18.