Originally Posted by MoreTears:
“But nobody in North American says "the_day of the month of_of the year_." In fact, I doubt anybody in the UK says anything so laborious either.
Obviously a day is smaller than a month and a month is smaller than a year. You are assuming logic demands an ordering of smallest-middle-biggest. Quite simply, no. Why not biggest-middle-smallest, then, as is the norm in the countries I listed above? That makes even more "sense," doesn't it? Logic does not apply to this. It is all about convention, custom.”
Where did I once say that anyone in the UK spells the date out that way? The fact still remains is that is what the date is whether you choose to say it that way or not.
Why not biggest, middle, smallest? Really? Its ironic that you would ask that in a Sherlock thread.
The reason it is logical to lay it in the order of small, medium, big when it comes to dates because the smallest factor being the day has the highest quantity (365), months (12) year (1). Therefore, you put the year at the end because it wont change for 365 days and so is the least 'significant' factor when looking at the date. Days change at the highest regularity so you put that at the start.
It really isn't rocket science..