Originally Posted by Brekkie:
“There is no chance in hell Schofield will be sacked by ITV bosses - they rate him (and he is one of the best presenters around) and as he's been given high profile Royal gigs lately they obviously want to encourage him to tackle traditional news ground rather than shy away from it.
The real issue should be with David Cameron - yes, it might be a witch hunt but surely after the Saville scandal he should be taking any such accusation seriously and not just dismissing it by basically saying "no, they're not paedos, they're gay!". Given Cameron's record as a boss though I suspect even if one of his MPs was outed as a 100% confirmed paedo he wouldn't have the guts to sack them. It's plebs he likes putting out of work after all.”
Schofield will survive, although it might put a dent in his standing in the short run. As for Cameron, the gay thing may have been unnecessary but he was certainly right to dismiss that particular piece of "research".
Originally Posted by iaindb:
“TMO's big plus is that it rates very well among 16-34 year olds. Can someone confirm - am I right in saying that it outrates Strictly in that age group?”
From the demos I've seen from Rzt, yes it does. It's usually the #2 show (excluding soaps) among 16-34's after X Factor.
Originally Posted by Wryip:
“The Director General may be a bumbling fool,but do the BBC really feel that sacking him (or him resigning) will solve the Savile Scandal? Savile was dead before he took the post and was he even in charge when Newsnight shelved their original report?”
He was Director of Vision at the time (a ridiculously pretentious title for "Head of TV", got to keep the HR department busy I guess!). So he was very much in the chain of command and some of the questions from MP's focussed on his time in that role (as we so often hear at parliament these days, he wasn't 100% sure, he didn't know it was happening, he didn't think to ask...).
He ultimately had to go, he's very damaged goods. The error here might be letting him go so soon. The press are loving this, especially after the phone hacking thing. But he was a shield - the public weren't impressed, the media weren't impressed so he was a good target. And providing target practice is the main reason people like Jeremy Hunt and Rebekah Brooks (have) kept their jobs. They desperately need to stop screwing up or else there will need to be another target.
It has been a spectacular mess. Who'd have thought that one week ago, with such desire to change the news agenda and focus on "political paedos", the BBC would again find itself at the centre of a public storm?