DS Forums

 
 

Producers Are Trying To Sandwhich Contestants They Don't Want!!....


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30-10-2012, 00:58
C14E
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 30,110
The problem with these theories is always that there is no real motivation for this kind of thing. TV producers care about ratings. It makes sense that they might want to protect certain acts in order to sustain interest in the series. But why on earth would they be bothered about which one of 13 acts went home in week one and then week two and week three? So long as their big names stay (and they're protected by the judges vote anyway) they wouldn't care.

The last act on should always bring the house down (true in the old system, true in the new one). A good act should always be on when there's a scheduling junction on BBC1 (end of Strictly or end of Merlin). There should always be a good act "coming up" - where there are two acts in one segment, one of those acts should be good. On a practical level, there are issues with staging (particularly where two acts perform back to back). They'll also try and mix it up between the categories (so one judge doesn't have several acts in a row) and types of songs (don't put 3 dreary ballads on in a row).

When I say "good" - I mean in the TV sense. An act that might be a draw for viewers. Either someone really talented or possibly someone controversial or someone that has had a particularly eventful week.
C14E is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 30-10-2012, 01:06
Bananafish
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,454
The problem with these theories is always that there is no real motivation for this kind of thing. TV producers care about ratings. It makes sense that they might want to protect certain acts in order to sustain interest in the series. But why on earth would they be bothered about which one of 13 acts went home in week one and then week two and week three? So long as their big names stay (and they're protected by the judges vote anyway) they wouldn't care.

The last act on should always bring the house down (true in the old system, true in the new one). A good act should always be on when there's a scheduling junction on BBC1 (end of Strictly or end of Merlin). There should always be a good act "coming up" - where there are two acts in one segment, one of those acts should be good. On a practical level, there are issues with staging (particularly where two acts perform back to back). They'll also try and mix it up between the categories (so one judge doesn't have several acts in a row) and types of songs (don't put 3 dreary ballads on in a row).

When I say "good" - I mean in the TV sense. An act that might be a draw for viewers. Either someone really talented or possibly someone controversial or someone that has had a particularly eventful week.
Well if you want just one example, they've been very deliberately (and very obviously) alternating the fortunes of the boyblands.

You can't have a battle of the boyblands with only one there, and you don't motivate fans of them to spend furiously with the change in the voting unless you keep raising them and dropping them.

Also Grumpy Gary's acts were all so obviously thrown under the bus at the start to get that whole story going.

And as for the Orange One, well that's been painfully obvious what's going on there.

Gone into it more in the voting change thread, but it's all far more unfair than before. Just much more subtle and less obvious than the death slot/pimp slot. People are just so used to that though that they are overlooking it all, and that's why the odds have been so out each week.

If you notice what is going on though, things like Kye being in the bottom 2 that week were obvious.
Bananafish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-10-2012, 09:56
shraine
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Leicester
Posts: 1,974
Some of you guys need to look at running order and see what they are trying to do. Jade was sandwhiched in week 3. She must of sooo near the bottom 2. So in week 4 they done it again and they got rid.
shraine is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:17.