As mentioned in another thread I started this new one to find out more stories of Sharon Osbournes long long history of previous spats with people.

Saint Sharon has just given her laughable side of the story in the papers. :yawn:

It's not the first time Sharon has been involved in spats with other people some that have resorted to violence. I suppose these things just seem to happen to follow her around and it's always the other persons fault?

I guess Steve is lucky she didn't assault him (as far as we know!). That's what usually happen to other people when they get on the wrong side of Sharon.



We know nothing of Steve so he deserves the benefit of the doubt.

But Sharon's history is far too revealing of someone who can abuse the power and privilege that fame and money can bring, and what happens to others who are unfortunate to cross her.



Have a read of the following links showing the sort of harrassment and viciousness this dysfunctional woman is capable off.

Some no doubt will find some excuse to dismiss or whitewash - but isn't it wonderful how the excuse of being outspoken can cover up a multitude of sins!

I think she's hilarious from a distance but it must be a absolute nightmare to know her and get on the wrong side of her.

There are a hell of a lot of reported incidences surrounding her, and far too many coincidences to excuse. I bet the cops are sick of sorting out her so called disputes with other people (not to mention the rest of the family).




http://archive.unearthed.com/?news,2003,04,0000016791 - Agent fears for her life after Sharon Osbourne assault

www.eonline.com/News/Items/0,1,11618,00.html - Sharon Osbourne's necklacegate

www.malefirst.co.uk/9912004-ent.html - Sharon Osbourne accused of assault on former housekeeper


She must spend a fortune for good PR (and lawyers) !




There's so much dirt to dish and these are just a few I found in a few minutes. I seem to remember something about poo in a handbag! There are bound to be loads more you can help me seach out and add:

In a way I still like Sharon despite things, but don't like her hypocrisy, fibs, and liberality with the truth.

I think she has loads of charm and is very funny, but still acknowledge she does have a nasty streak and can't believe she's trying to pass herself off as the wounded party.

Steve deserves a medal for putting up with Sharon's cr@p and bullying for the last few weeks and he needs to hire a bodyguard quickly!

Very interesting reading. I really feel sorry for Steve for having to deal with this woman. I also doubt that she will leave him alone either. She is a very nasty woman

It doesn't matter to me whether Steve is perfect or not!
But I do genuinely believe that Sharon's attack on him on national T.V. was totally unforgiveable.
Her family life let alone the above examples of her temper show that she is far from perfect herself.
I think she looks stunning even though it's cost her hundreds of thousands of pounds to look like that.She also has a real presence about her.
But She meant every word she said that night.She as an impartial judge lost her temper.
Perhaps Steve didn't show her the respect she thought she ought to receive.Perhaps she can't forgive him for being there while Tabby was voted out.
We will probably never know the whole story unless someone like Simon decides to spill the beans.
But without a doubt she tried to sabotage his performance that night by upsetting him to the extent that he was more worried about what his girlfriend thought than on concentrating on his performance.
I used to admire her.I now despise what she did and I would feel the same if she'd done it to one of the others as well.

Well said. I also thought that when Steve was being interviewed on the 'This Morning' show today, he was finding it hard to talk, let alone sing. It was also reported that he forgot some of his lines on the TOTP show. I hope that the other night has not rocked Steve's self confidence. No matter what Sharon thinks of him, he is a good singer who is very popular with the public. He wouldnt be my favourite singer personally, but that doesnt give me the right to not let his fans enjoy listening to him. I hope he pulls himself together and shows Louis and Sharon and any other doubters that he can make it in the music industry.

There is something really unfair about the Sharon/Steve thing.

She is still determined to ruin any chance he has of a career by trying to ruin his reputation - going on Richard and Judy, her artcle in the newspaper etc.

As Simon said, he and Sharon are succesful players - big names - in the music business whereas Steve is tring to embark on a career in the public eye.

Sharon is famous, successful, has many connections in the press and with celebrity friends, she's immensely rich, and has a huge network of public relations people that money can buy. She's incredibly powerful and can get away with behaving how she wants.

Her huge ego can crush anyone who does not kiss her ass sufficently.

Steve is just a normal bloke from a normal background - just a member of the public who has worked hard singing for a living in pubs, and has a dream of getting a recording contract and is on the verge of making it. He's just one of us plebs from a normal background, on his own, and so much weaker than her.

There's such a difference in the power balance here it's so unfair and outrageous that she is trying to scupper his only chance and totally destroy him.

Sharon should pick on her own size.

It's so unbelievably vindictive and malicious. At the end of the day, so what if they didn't get on and exchanged words. Big deal, get over it Sharon you bully.

I know what you mean. It leaves a very bitter taste in my mouth. It is completely unfair that he has to put up with all this BS.

Sums it up for me!

Even if there was any truth in what Sharon said (and I prefer to make my OWN mind up about people, thanks!) she was out of order trying to ruin the whole thing for Steve. I would say the same thing if she had dished out the same treatment to ANY other contestant - it was unnecessary, uncalled for, unprofessional, unconstructive and totally unEQUAL!

She deserved the hostile audience reaction - maybe it will help her to realise that not everybody buys into the 'Mama Osbourne' hype and that some people find the 'You're an Osbourne now!' line quite pathetic (if I was talented enough to have made it through to be one of her final group, I would still have said 'No Thanks - I've got my own family, ta very much. )

And how can she say she doesn't like songs about food (McArthur Park) when this is a food lyric from Black Sabbath - what hypocrisy!

WAR PIGS (The OzzMan Cometh)
Witches gather at black masses
Bodies burning in red ashes
On the hill the church in ruin.
Is the scene of evil doings
It's a place for all black sinners
Watch them eating dead rats' innards.
I guess it's the same, where ever you may go
Oh lord yeah

Just gone off my chicken salad sandwich.....

These two sentences really sum up the whole thing for me

Get a grip....these people decide to get up in front of judges and perform to get there praise or get caned by them.
Sharon is a professional who calls a spade a spade, no messing around she tells you straight.
If they don't like it, don't get up in front of her.
Everyone calls Simon..nasty...why??
Just because he tells people straight that this sort of career is not for them, why does he get it in the neck.
Much better than saying 'oh you are wonderful' and then sneaking off around the corner and stabbbing people in the back.
The other thng is if Steve thinks its going to be all roses around the cottage door then hes wrong, the press at some point will turn and if he thinks Sharons comments were hurtful
he'll be thanking her for preparing him for whats to come.
Good luck to Steve but don't keep playing the victim and blaming the professionals.

If she had said she thought his singing was crap, fair enough. If she had given him some professional criticism, how she thought he could make changes to his act, fair enough. That is her professional opinion. What wasn't necessary was to be so personal and tell the watching public that she thought he was a fake, made snide comments about his relationship, but with nothing to back her comments up - all her opinion and not one that is needed on a talent contest. There is outspoken and there is rude and she overstepped the line by a considerable margin.

Simon, actually, is the wrong person to pick on. I'm not gonna go into, just point out a bit of footage from the X-Factor start which I think is symbolic:

I think it was the chap who hums... but whoever it was did their thing. Simon and Louis say he doesn't stand a chance and to go home. Sharon argues with him and then says 'you've got wicked BO.... P**s off!'.

She then turned to Simon and Louis and says 'Couldn't you smell it?' to which Simon mubles something to the effect of 'Yeah, but I didn't want to mention it.'



Get a grip! Victim playing?

I think she shat in someone's suitcase once, and another time she sent a giftwrapped parcel of her poo to someone, then during an episode of The Osbournes she peed in Dill's bottle of whiskey with Kelly shrieking and trying to stop her, which resulted in Sharon peeing on Kelly.
Oh and I remember the story years ago of Sharon peeing in Lyndsey de Paul's handbag!

I think I see a theme developing here!

She really should get a toilet installed in her house - I'm sure she's got enough money but there are some good bargains at Homebase at the moment.

It was Lyndsey de Paul's suitcase she pooed in.

That's quite some research on Sharon's past, and because she insulted some bloke on a tv Talent show?

And Steve gets the benefit of the doubt because nothing is known about his past?

It all sounds like a normal day in the great British gutter press. :yawn:

Well if anyone can prove that Steve has behaved in as VILE a fashion as Sharon Osbourne, then he would deserve all the stick imaginable IMHO (yet she's admired for her 'strength of character')!

Thing is, if she chose to get personal he had EVERY right to sling mud back - as did Simon - but they chose not to. I think they were right to. No matter what criticism Simon (or Louis for that matter) have levelled at contestants, it's never been as downright NASTY as Sharon's comments about Steve. Sorry, but 'I can't apologise for being a bitch' doesn't cut any mustard for me.

That's the trouble with old women, they just can't control where they pee. Please Simon change your mind and kick out the old hag for next time.

It's a matter of opinion as to whether Sharon was VILE. OTT, silly, petty, but I didn't see vile. Coupled with that we saw the end of something that had obviously been going on behind the scenes for some time.

Sharon shouldn't have brought it onto a public forum granted, but it hardly calls for the need to dredge through every little/large upset Sharon has been party to for the last however many years.

She's in her 50's, a mouthy opinionated woman, therefore she is bound to have had run ins along the way, so what? Her past altercations have nothing to do with what went on between her and Steve, unless her character is being cited as evidence, in which case it seems a bit unfair not to use the same criteria for Steve.

I find that ageist and sexist.

It has been said many times that what happened behind the scene's is
Sharon said something nice to Steve and he just turned around saying Blah Blah Blah or Yer Yer Yer ( cant remember what one lol)
And as he said in his defence was that he is so used to her saying unkind things to him That he just was not listening
to her anymore and so did not realise that she was being nice !

But was she actually being nice or was she being sarcastic cf The two faced so and so? I don't know and maybe Steve didn't either.

I don't know Bev and nor does Steve , As he wasn't listening

Still say she fancied Steve and he didnt give her a second glance.