DS Forums

 
 

They should be allowed computers


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17-11-2012, 19:50
Paace
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,487

I can't see any reason not to allow them to use computers in this day and age. It wouldn't diminish the programme in any way but would enhance it.

It makes no sense whatsoever to have them pouring over yellow pages for hours when they could be getting on with the task. Also how ridiculous is it for them to be phoning up businesses asking what such and such a word means.
Paace is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 17-11-2012, 20:01
gilesb
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,420
I don't think it really matters. Both teams have the same resources and that is the point.
gilesb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-2012, 20:23
Kyle_Johansen
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: St Albans
Posts: 83
I can't see any reason not to allow them to use computers in this day and age. It wouldn't diminish the programme in any way but would enhance it.

It makes no sense whatsoever to have them pouring over yellow pages for hours when they could be getting on with the task. Also how ridiculous is it for them to be phoning up businesses asking what such and such a word means.
Pouring over the yellow pages for hours is part of the task, not an especially intersting part, but an important part none the less.
Kyle_Johansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-2012, 20:36
Paace
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,487
Pouring over the yellow pages for hours is part of the task, not an especially intersting part, but an important part none the less.
If I told any of the bosses I worked for that I spent 6 hours trying to identify and locate a business I wouldn't last long. AS should set the tasks in the real world which includes computers and dictionaries.
Paace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-2012, 20:36
george.millman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
I agree with Paace, being able to use computers would make the tasks more believable and realistic. I don't watch the show for the entertainment of watching people screw up, I watch it because I like seeing the people who do well, and working out who's going to win.
george.millman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-2012, 20:42
JumpTheShark
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: London
Posts: 2,540
When in the business world would they not have access to the internet when they needed to source products? It makes no sense at all forcing them to use the Yellow Pages.
JumpTheShark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-11-2012, 22:05
Kyle_Johansen
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: St Albans
Posts: 83
When in the business world would they not have access to the internet when they needed to source products? It makes no sense at all forcing them to use the Yellow Pages.

In business you will need to find information that will take longer than a casual google search, but none that would make good television; on account of being too specific. The only way to have a partially-(tickbox)-research based task is to ban google and dictionaries. I also think realism is bad argument; when in the business world will they have to source their products frrom a little shop?
Kyle_Johansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2012, 00:51
cookie_365
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Brighton
Posts: 574
What were they pouring over the yellow pages? And did they clean it up afterwards?

cookie_365 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2012, 05:53
rwebster
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,231
I get what you're saying, but I think it's done like this to control the amount of information they've got available and make sure it's fair, rather than to make sure it's hard.

Because having the whole internet at their disposal adds more variables. Who knows the better website, who can put together the right search term, etc. etc. It makes the information limitless, they can veer off in all sorts of directions. If you narrow it down to a few set texts, though, you can control it, and be sure both teams are drawing from the same pool of information.

Besides which, there are quite a few dead ends on the internet. How many of the businesses they go to look like they'd have up-to-date website listings? I wonder, with a resource as big as the internet, there might be a danger it'd be information overload. The kind of businesses they'd be looking for would be like needles in haystacks. Way more red herrings, and I don't think many of the businesses that are going to be negotiable on price are likely to have particularly high PageRankings. Plus, they'd need ten computers if everyone's to research at once. I reckon there's a certain amount of merit in sticking to books. Easier, more visual, and limits the teams to equal and finite amounts of information.

It isn't very realistic, though, no. :p
rwebster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2012, 09:46
george.millman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
I get what you're saying, but I think it's done like this to control the amount of information they've got available and make sure it's fair, rather than to make sure it's hard.

Because having the whole internet at their disposal adds more variables. Who knows the better website, who can put together the right search term, etc. etc. It makes the information limitless, they can veer off in all sorts of directions. If you narrow it down to a few set texts, though, you can control it, and be sure both teams are drawing from the same pool of information.

Besides which, there are quite a few dead ends on the internet. How many of the businesses they go to look like they'd have up-to-date website listings? I wonder, with a resource as big as the internet, there might be a danger it'd be information overload. The kind of businesses they'd be looking for would be like needles in haystacks. Way more red herrings, and I don't think many of the businesses that are going to be negotiable on price are likely to have particularly high PageRankings. Plus, they'd need ten computers if everyone's to research at once. I reckon there's a certain amount of merit in sticking to books. Easier, more visual, and limits the teams to equal and finite amounts of information.

It isn't very realistic, though, no.
Fair point.
george.millman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2012, 09:58
Takae
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 11,932
Who cares about realism? It's more fun to see them struggle without computers.
Takae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2012, 11:14
seellee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,420
This task has never been about realism. It's about seeing how well they can apply their knowledge and negotiate. If you gave them google it would be far too easy in my opinion.

The apprentice is not supposed to be realistic it's about testing skills in difficult situations.
seellee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2012, 11:53
Paace
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,487
This task has never been about realism. It's about seeing how well they can apply their knowledge and negotiate. If you gave them google it would be far too easy in my opinion.

The apprentice is not supposed to be realistic it's about testing skills in difficult situations.
Its also an entertainment show and what's entertaining about people sitting in a room looking at directories for most of the day . I prefer to see them out and about and dealing with people. Even with the help of computers most tasks are not going to be straight forward and easy when you're dealing with people.
Paace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2012, 12:33
MuSiKe
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,246
They all had smartphones, why didn't they just Google what a candelabrum was? That's what I wan't to know!
MuSiKe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2012, 12:58
george.millman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
They all had smartphones, why didn't they just Google what a candelabrum was? That's what I wan't to know!
Last year Zara just phones a library and asked them to look the obscure one up... don't know why no one did that this time, they surely saw it last year.
george.millman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2012, 19:49
platelet
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: GL51 0EX
Posts: 14,094
Last year Zara just phones a library and asked them to look the obscure one up... don't know why no one did that this time, they surely saw it last year.
I suspect there were told they couldn't. It was innovative of Zara to do it, it would prove nothing if they copied her.
platelet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2012, 19:56
cbe21ok
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Close to the Toon
Posts: 1,465
They all had smartphones, why didn't they just Google what a candelabrum was? That's what I wan't to know!
What amazes me is that not one of them knew what candelabrum was in the first place. Found that really strange to be honest.
cbe21ok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2012, 20:28
Paace
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 12,487
What amazes me is that not one of them knew what candelabrum was in the first place. Found that really strange to be honest.
I've never heard the word candelabrum being used, candelabra yes. I think most of the people they asked would have known what a candelabra was.

Just ridiculous really even denying them a dictionary . Instead the BBC thinks our future bright hopes should waste most of the day trying to find out what a word means .
Paace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2012, 22:38
george.millman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
I suspect there were told they couldn't. It was innovative of Zara to do it, it would prove nothing if they copied her.
Just ridiculous really even denying them a dictionary . Instead the BBC thinks our future bright hopes should waste most of the day trying to find out what a word means .
I don't think it's fair to say it would prove nothing... if the only decent things people could ever do were things that no one had ever done before, no one would ever do anything...

If that's the way to find out what a word means, what's wrong with doing it? Who cares if someone had previously done it? It's not copying people that isn't innovative, it's knowing what to copy and what not to copy.
george.millman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-11-2012, 22:42
jonny1973
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 79
The task is about face-to-face negotiation, not to see who can use Kelkoo or Google.
jonny1973 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2012, 11:54
theid
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,470
I've never heard the word candelabrum being used, candelabra yes. I think most of the people they asked would have known what a candelabra was.

Just ridiculous really even denying them a dictionary . Instead the BBC thinks our future bright hopes should waste most of the day trying to find out what a word means .
Candelabra is the plural of candelabrum. I loathed Latin at school but it is extraordinary how much more you know about the English language if you were taught just a modicum of Latin, even if you think you didn't retain it.

I find it hard to imagine that these young people have never come upon or seen the word "candelabra", which would lead them to "candelabrum" if they thought about it for two second. Even if they haven't seen one surely they would have heard the word used or seen it written down in literature, dramas, news stories, programmes about antiques, etc. I do worry about the very limited scope of young people and it is extraordinary that even with the internet and "spell check" they frequently make basic errors.
theid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2012, 12:01
Dogmatix
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: European Union
Posts: 1,640
... the word "candelabra", which would lead them to "candelabrum" if they thought about it for two second.
Not sure about that. How many Latin words with -um in the singular AND -a in the plural are in common use in English? Even 'agenda' and 'data' are technically plural but are often used to mean the singular - I've even seen 'agenda' superpluralised to 'agendae'.
Dogmatix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2012, 13:33
george.millman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,587
Candelabra is the plural of candelabrum. I loathed Latin at school but it is extraordinary how much more you know about the English language if you were taught just a modicum of Latin, even if you think you didn't retain it.

I find it hard to imagine that these young people have never come upon or seen the word "candelabra", which would lead them to "candelabrum" if they thought about it for two second. Even if they haven't seen one surely they would have heard the word used or seen it written down in literature, dramas, news stories, programmes about antiques, etc. I do worry about the very limited scope of young people and it is extraordinary that even with the internet and "spell check" they frequently make basic errors.
I was surprised that no one knew about that, but I don't think it's fair to cast doubt on all young people (one of which I am) because of it. If the whole women's team hadn't known what it was, would you have said you worry about the limited scope of women?
george.millman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2012, 14:00
Takae
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 11,932
I was surprised that no one knew about that, but I don't think it's fair to cast doubt on all young people (one of which I am) because of it. If the whole women's team hadn't known what it was, would you have said you worry about the limited scope of women?
Oh, the irony.
Takae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2012, 19:58
Dix
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: LFLF Research Div
Posts: 49,394
I've never heard the word candelabrum being used, candelabra yes. I think most of the people they asked would have known what a candelabra was.

Just ridiculous really even denying them a dictionary . Instead the BBC thinks our future bright hopes should waste most of the day trying to find out what a word means .
Never a waste of time looking up a word in the dictionary, as that's how I learned what words meant in English, when I was a nipper, so the youth of today have few excuses not to find out in same way.
Dix is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:39.