• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Lisa constantly overmarked
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
Yorkie47
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by coppertop1:
“I applaud her for her attitude

I think she has great musicality, is really light on her feet, and performs the dances better than some others on the programme.

I don't dislike her, BUT why are we not seeing a level of indignation on the boards about her overmarking.

That samba last night was really quite poor , the samba rolls were dreadful, her timing was so off Robin stood on her foot and as for landing that eye watering split so inelegantly

It was really not worth 8 at all, and yet last night and this morning, where is the outrage at her overmarking???

Is it just accepted that she is just judged to a different standard because she is a fat girl dancing reasonably well,if so it is positive discrimination gone mad.”

I think you're quite right. I'm overweight myself (though not in the Lisa bracket!) and applaud her attitude and energy. She was expected to be complete rubbish - big fat girl blobbing about the stage, heavy footed and totally useless. However, like many big people, she's light on her feet and being overweight isn't QUITE the devastating drawback thin people imagine it to be.

However, the judges should have got well past their "OMG, just imagine - she's fat and she can actually move her body!" stage by now. Her footwork is all over the place and for her to get the same marks as some of the far better dancers is becoming a joke.

Lisa getting 8 and Kimberley getting 9? The difference in them is ASTRONOMICAL!
sofakat
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by MACTOWIN:
“IMO she would get far less marks if she was a size 10 and Danced the way she does. I am overweight but I would not wished to get treated like a special case as imo she does.”

Absolutely. She is a 'special case' in the judges eyes and I think that is quite wrong.

She was appalling last night.
sofakat
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by Yorkie47:
“I think you're quite right. I'm overweight myself (though not in the Lisa bracket!) and applaud her attitude and energy. She was expected to be complete rubbish - big fat girl blobbing about the stage, heavy footed and totally useless. However, like many big people, she's light on her feet and being overweight isn't QUITE the devastating drawback thin people imagine it to be.

However, the judges should have got well past their "OMG, just imagine - she's fat and she can actually move her body!" stage by now. Her footwork is all over the place and for her to get the same marks as some of the far better dancers is becoming a joke.

Lisa getting 8 and Kimberley getting 9? The difference in them is ASTRONOMICAL!”

All of the above. Spot on! Very well put Yorkie.
Paace
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by fatskia:
“It was one of the dances that looked like a complete dance performance. It may not have been a Samba and it may not have been good, but it was a performance.

I do think as such, the judges should be marking her down because of the content and technique and let the public vote on the performance.
But it isn't a pure dance competition and if the judges want to give her big marks for enthusiasm, they are allowed to do that.”

But how do you measure enthusiasm? Others may be just as enthusiastic but not able to put it across so well.
footygirl
18-11-2012
I would have been commenting about the lack of samba content - admittedly that is Robin's fault - and I would have marked her down to a 5

The judges seem loathe to criticise her - could it be because of her weight. The problem is they are now being quite patronising and ignoring the faults
ESPIONdansant
18-11-2012
If you watched yourself back you'd have to admit it was terrible. How come she doesn't know?
TerryM22
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by ESPIONdansant:
“If you watched yourself back you'd have to admit it was terrible. How come she doesn't know?”

Because it wasn't terrible.
ESPIONdansant
18-11-2012
Oh, Terry, I've told you before. That optician's appointment is WAY overdue... ;o)
SheShe
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by Yorkie47:
“I think you're quite right. I'm overweight myself (though not in the Lisa bracket!) and applaud her attitude and energy. She was expected to be complete rubbish - big fat girl blobbing about the stage, heavy footed and totally useless. However, like many big people, she's light on her feet and being overweight isn't QUITE the devastating drawback thin people imagine it to be.

However, the judges should have got well past their "OMG, just imagine - she's fat and she can actually move her body!" stage by now. Her footwork is all over the place and for her to get the same marks as some of the far better dancers is becoming a joke.

Lisa getting 8 and Kimberley getting 9? The difference in them is ASTRONOMICAL!”

Good post. I've loved watching Lisa perform and adore her relationship with Robin (had never heard of her before) but I did think the samba was pretty poor and certainly nowhere near the standard of Kimberley's dance.
lady latina
18-11-2012
I don't usually comment on this matter, because regardless the judges scores, is a public who decided who they like to save.

But I can't help feel for other celebrities and professionals, who spent time learning techniques of the dances and professional who spent time to put a lot of content in their routines and been judge different.

l like Lisa energy but she hasn't learned proper technique, and is the same dance again and again. But seems that the public like a performer rather than a good dancer.

Sometimes I wonder if the professional maybe go to the route to please the public rather than judges and to do justice to a dance.

I'm in the side of the public who rather watch a good dance, full of content and good technique rather than just a performer. And I'm possible in the minority of the public view.
ESPIONdansant
18-11-2012
She's an energetic woman. She knows how to perform. She performs with verve.

However the footwork could have been bettered by a drunken donkey in clogs. Her least accurate dance by far. Littered with errors.
Alli-F
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by lady latina:
“I don't usually comment on this matter, because regardless the judges scores, is a public who decided who they like to save.

But I can't help feel for other celebrities and professionals, who spent time learning techniques of the dances and professional who spent time to put a lot of content in their routines and been judge different.

l like Lisa energy but she hasn't learned proper technique, and is the same dance again and again. But seems that the public like a performer rather than a good dancer.

Sometimes I wonder if the professional maybe go to the route to please the public rather than judges and to do justice to a dance.

I'm in the side of the public who rather watch a good dance, full of content and good technique rather than just a performer. And I'm possible in the minority of the public view.”


I agree with most of that except when it comes to the public saving who they like. Especially with the dance off this year, the judges are artificially inflating the scores of someone like Lisa and then if she's in the dance off, they'll save her again, so someone the public may like more will be lost to the judges' overmarking and having favourites.
coppertop1
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by lady latina:
“I don't usually comment on this matter, because regardless the judges scores, is a public who decided who they like to save.

But I can't help feel for other celebrities and professionals, who spent time learning techniques of the dances and professional who spent time to put a lot of content in their routines and been judge different.

l like Lisa energy but she hasn't learned proper technique, and is the same dance again and again. But seems that the public like a performer rather than a good dancer.

Sometimes I wonder if the professional maybe go to the route to please the public rather than judges and to do justice to a dance.

I'm in the side of the public who rather watch a good dance, full of content and good technique rather than just a performer. And I'm possible in the minority of the public view.”

I think you might have hit on something here, her role was to be the joke contestant like Russel last year and she is too good a dancer to be that. I am aware he too was a reasonable dancer but was hampered by injury.

This is why people are frustrated and want to see more from her but she is stuck in the producers, Robin or her own mind in the role originally assigned to her.

Just like Anne Widdecombe, Nancy and Russel the public backlash will come as this type of contestant is the sort the public tire of.

I would give her 3 weeks tops now
Spin turn
18-11-2012
I dont't usually go with the 'xyz was overmarked' threads, but I agree with the OP on this. Lisa has a lot of positives but the lack of constructive criticism is not helping her to develop and is giving her a false sense of secuirty. Where is the journnnneeeee we all like to like to see on Strictly? Her Samba was not very good and compared badly to her Chacha which was a pleasant surprise.
Mrs-Mop
18-11-2012
Although she was marked generously I think it's okay.....
The others with poor technique don't perform well so the lack is obvious
Lisa gets her extra marks for presentation, enthusiasm, sheer enjoyment, fun, she's infectious ...the crowd feel the joy and the connection with Robin

Dani and Vincent have this same enthusiasm plus technique.......could be a winning combination ( boo to biggins )
Monaogg
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by Mrs-Mop:
“Although she was marked generously I think it's okay.....
The others with poor technique don't perform well so the lack is obvious
Lisa gets her extra marks for presentation, enthusiasm, sheer enjoyment, fun, she's infectious ...the crowd feel the joy and the connection with Robin

Dani and Vincent have this same enthusiasm plus technique.......could be a winning combination ( boo to biggins )”

Agree. Despite the obvious nay sayers on here, she is certainly pulling in the public votes.
Button62
18-11-2012
That was one of the worst Sambas I have ever seen on the show. When the 8 paddles came out I just imagined James and Denise high fiving each other in the Tesspit knowing that their 10s were secure.

Lisa is enthusiastic, but extra points shouldn't be awarded for that. Her weight hampers her, but shhhhhh, the judges can't be seen to be fattist.
Agent Krycek
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by fatskia:
“It was one of the dances that looked like a complete dance performance. It may not have been a Samba and it may not have been good, but it was a performance.

I do think as such, the judges should be marking her down because of the content and technique and let the public vote on the performance.
But it isn't a pure dance competition and if the judges want to give her big marks for enthusiasm, they are allowed to do that.”

True, but then give the same marks to Richard who's also hugely enthusiastic - or are they juding him by a different criteria?
fifitrixibelle
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by lady latina:
“I don't usually comment on this matter, because regardless the judges scores, is a public who decided who they like to save.

But I can't help feel for other celebrities and professionals, who spent time learning techniques of the dances and professional who spent time to put a lot of content in their routines and been judge different.

l like Lisa energy but she hasn't learned proper technique, and is the same dance again and again. But seems that the public like a performer rather than a good dancer.

Sometimes I wonder if the professional maybe go to the route to please the public rather than judges and to do justice to a dance.

I'm in the side of the public who rather watch a good dance, full of content and good technique rather than just a performer. And I'm possible in the minority of the public view.”

Fully agree, as I said on another thread, it's laziness on their part and the sloppy performances reflect this....however why should they try and change this winning formula of jazz hands, rictus smiles, and humble pie eyes at the judges desk when they know they will not get critiqued on the same par as others.
I don't see a "performance" I see a lazy mess.
I admire Michael for his hard work and improvement and don't need to see or hear a shouty, in your face persona to know that he and others are just as full (if not more) of enthusiasm.
Alli-F
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by Monaogg:
“Agree. Despite the obvious nay sayers on here, she is certainly pulling in the public votes.”


And we know that because.......? She's never been that low on the leaderboard.
All we really know is she's pulling in more votes than Kimberley.
jtnorth
18-11-2012
I really like Lisa and want to see her do well. If I could give some of the other celebs this year an injection of her enthusiasm and performance I would. But I think the public should vote for enthusiasm and performance. I think the judges should by now be commenting that her samba, salsa, jive and charleston are pretty much impossible to tell apart. I don't think it will do Lisa any good to be so protected. It doesn't have to be about her weight - I don't think that's the issue. The judges were willing enough to criticise Flavia's choreography as not being what they expect of an American Smooth, so why can't they tell Robin the samba wasn't a sufficient samba? People would still vote for her, probably even more.

I've never been a fan of the judges, but I've never felt the gap between what they see and what I see as much as this year. Making Richard camp everything up because apparently that's what all gay men must do. Ripping into Louis but never mentioning he needs to improve his performance. The kid gloves for Lisa and until this week Victoria. I don't understand.
Monaogg
18-11-2012
Deleted
Monaogg
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by Alli-F:
“And we know that because.......? She's never been that low on the leaderboard.
All we really know is she's pulling in more votes than Kimberley.”

The BBC team blogs are a fairly good litmus test of the popular.
Louis is well ahead of the rest, with Lisa second. Dani, Nicky & Kimberly are about level followed by Michael & Denise.
Alli-F
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by Monaogg:
“The BBC team blogs are a fairly good litmus test of the popular.
Louis is well ahead of the rest, with Lisa second. Dani, Nicky & Kimberly are about level followed by Michael & Denise.”



Oh ok. I guess tonight's result might tell us a bit more.
Monaogg
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by Alli-F:
“Oh ok. I guess tonight's result might tell us a bit more. ”

Last year Harry was streets ahead of the rest on team blogs right from the start. So there you go.
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map