|
||||||||
Analysis of most/least popular polls |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,654
|
Quote:
As in reliant on how others poll as well.
For Austin to have avoided the DO there would have had to have been a complete reversal of the board voting wise with him first, and Lisa second, and that of course was never going to be if that's right. Austin (4+1 = 5) Tom (3+3 = 6) Lisa (2+2 = 4) Rachel (1+4 = 5 but lower public vote than Austin, so in the dance-off) results in a Lisa vs Rachel dance-off. This was why that week was barmy, as if Lisa's fans had voted for her a bit more and got her past Rachel, she actually probably would have gone home up against Rachel's amazing tango. Hence they were in the situation where, by not voting for Lisa, they were actually making her safer. Such is the Strictly scoring system. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: On an enforced UK holiday.
Posts: 19,360
|
Quote:
Actually, if Austin were top, (and I've decided he was, so p'neurr) any combination of public vote OTHER than the one he got would have seen him safe eg :
Austin (4+1 = 5) Tom (3+3 = 6) Lisa (2+2 = 4) Rachel (1+4 = 5 but lower public vote than Austin, so in the dance-off) results in a Lisa vs Rachel dance-off. This was why that week was barmy, as if Lisa's fans had voted for her a bit more and got her past Rachel, she actually probably would have gone home up against Rachel's amazing tango. Hence they were in the situation where, by not voting for Lisa, they were actually making her safer. Such is the Strictly scoring system. Nuts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,922
|
Yes I agree that it will be possible for Michael to go even if he tops the vote & he has more competition for votes this year than in say Chris Hollins year when his opposition was a bit marmite
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,792
|
I think it's futile to read anything into any poll on here - such a tiny sample can give an entirely different result to the total public vote.
Plus I think opinion on here is likely to be much more polarised than in reality. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,951
|
Quote:
Judging by what we know for sure from Kimberleys fall from grace week, which is that Michael was definitely in the top 4 of the vote I think if he goes to the bottom of the board again he will be saved. I think he will make the semis at least.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() if I can just make a comment about comparing Michael to Chris Hollins, who I also supported. Michael is a much better dancer than Chris was. Ola couldnt give Chris any choreography beyond what I would describe as intermediate standard. Natalie has already given Michael some challenging stuff to do, and he's done it. I am just wondering if among all the male celeb dancers ever, if Michael has the "best" driving leg I've ever seen just watch in their next ballroom, when they are in hold
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 150
|
I would personally love to see Michael and Nat go to the final and hopefully win. He had NO dancing experience in contrast to Denise/Dani/Kimberly/Nicky to an extent and Louis with his gym training. He and Nat are a great partnership and have improved so much
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Creepy Crawley
Posts: 185
|
Quote:
I would personally love to see Michael and Nat go to the final and hopefully win. He had NO dancing experience in contrast to Denise/Dani/Kimberly/Nicky to an extent and Louis with his gym training. He and Nat are a great partnership and have improved so much
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,770
|
Quote:
Michael doesn't stand a chance in hell of winning. He just isn't good enough out of hold.
I was so thrilled when they won! |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Richmond, Surrey.
Posts: 13,814
|
Quote:
Nope. I started off not being a fan as I didn't like him as a cricketer but week by week they have grown on me & Natalie is a goddess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 501
|
Am loving Michael and Natalie. I have only voted once this series and it was for them! Would like to see them get to the semis, however I think there could be a surprise exit this weekend coming.w
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 521
|
Quote:
Agree, only one left i will vote for..always voted for the non dancers as for me the show is about seeing someone with no dance experience go on to become a good dancer
I so agree with this. I don't mind that some of the celebrities start off being able to dance but it is much more interesting to see those who are not very good at the start learn week by week and get better and better. I don't think Michael will win. It's quite likely going to be Denise who has been able to dance since day 1. How boring a result that will be |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:18.




