• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
Cruel what they did to Kimberely
<<
<
1 of 4
>>
>
Paace
18-11-2012
If the couples are called safe 'in no particular order' why leave Kimberely in the bottom 3 for two consecutive weeks. Is it just another ploy by the SCD production to try and create tension for their Wembly fiasco?
-Sid-
18-11-2012
It was a bit naughty but there are far worse things in life I'd deem "cruel".

She's through, that's the main thing
monalisa62003
18-11-2012
they do it all the time
Paace
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by monalisa62003:
“ they do it all the time”

to who
tallulahula
18-11-2012
yep, I thought that was unecessary
Vodka_Drinka
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by Paace:
“to who”

They've done it loads of times to people who've been in the bottom two the week before.
sue272
18-11-2012
No choice really, the first couples called were in with Claudia when she introduced Girls Aloud.

In reality, all the elimination was done at the end of the recording, and GA had already performed.
Paace
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by -Sid-:
“It was a bit naughty but there are far worse things in life I'd deem "cruel".

She's through, that's the main thing ”

Sure but not if your Kimberely and Pasha.
Sallyforth
18-11-2012
Sometimes IIRC they do call survivors sooner. But they were just after creating a bit of "suspense".
Tiger Rose
18-11-2012
At the end of the day the producers are there to make good telly & leaving Kimberley there til last did that. No big deal really.
Pet Monkey
18-11-2012
Poor bugger must have thought the worst

Glad she's through
etp
18-11-2012
I guess they thought it would get us all excited as we might have finally got to see Len pickle his walnuts.
Malik24
18-11-2012
"In no particular order" just means the saved couples aren't called out in terms of their public ranking position. They often engineer it for tension, esp. the last couple standing.
kittles
18-11-2012
"in no particular order" my arse!

they clearly did it to up the "tension", maybe hoping she might cry or something

It may not be cruel but I thought it was how can one put it? bad form
Paace
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by sue272:
“No choice really, the first couples called were in with Claudia when she introduced Girls Aloud.

In reality, all the elimination was done at the end of the recording, and GA had already performed.”

Don't understand your point. Tess is told to read out the order of the couples by SCD production.
Chris1964
18-11-2012
I presume the show ran as it was presented tonight, with Girls Aloud performing before the final rundown, in which case it was a bit awkward for her to have to perform and then go back for the verdict.
girlcrisis
18-11-2012
I guess the suspense makes "good TV" but she looked so upset that it was very unpleasant viewing.
sue272
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by Paace:
“Don't understand your point. Tess is told to read out the order of the couples by SCD production.”

Sorry not being too clear there

She could not have been in the first set called out was all I meant....
monalisa62003
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by Chris1964:
“I presume the show ran as it was presented tonight, with Girls Aloud performing before the final rundown, in which case it was a bit awkward for her to have to perform and then go back for the verdict.”

pretty sure they would have done it first or last? not inbetween. she had to get changed there wouldn't have been time?
sue272
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by monalisa62003:
“pretty sure they would have done it first or last? not inbetween. she had to get changed there wouldn't have been time?”

Girls Aloud performed at the start of the recording of the results show, before any eliminations.
primer
18-11-2012
it was small payback for what girls aloud did to us...
monalisa62003
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by sue272:
“Girls Aloud performed at the start of the recording of the results show, before any eliminations.”

yeah thought they would do it like that.
Chris1964
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by monalisa62003:
“pretty sure they would have done it first or last? not inbetween. she had to get changed there wouldn't have been time?”

You would hope so-perhaps someone who was actually there can clarify.
echad
18-11-2012
Well someone has to be there...
bobajot
18-11-2012
Originally Posted by Chris1964:
“I presume the show ran as it was presented tonight, with Girls Aloud performing before the final rundown, in which case it was a bit awkward for her to have to perform and then go back for the verdict.”

Er it was all done last night the spoiler was delayed because of GA.
<<
<
1 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map