Just wondering, as night after predictable night the G.B.P. keeps voting for Helen to do the trials, whether the number of trials each individual can do in a series could be capped, say at 3? Otherwise the whole thing becomes a bit pointless "Oh I wonder who is going to get voted for" as the public see a "victim" and go for them like a pack of rabid dogs.

That way we could at least have a chance to get to see someone else doing a trial. I find Helen irritating but also it seems a bit disturbing to see how she gets picked on again and again like a weak person being targetted by bullies. Pointless really, we know she cant do it, move on.......

I want to see as many people doing a trial as possible, is that unreasonable?

sounds reasonable to me.

i think 2 maximum per person

Considering Janice Dickinson did TEN in one series, I think Helen's got off lightly

But to keep it interesting, I think a cap would be productive - or the celebrity is excempt from the next trial, so it varies day to day.

I think if they made the trials interesting, instead of just bringing on the bugs, rats and snakes, it would put a stop to all of this nonsensical voting.

I think that it shouldn't be possible for a celebrity to do two trials consecutively.

so if the do Trial One, they can't be voted again until Trial Three. That way the "entertaining" ones can be voted for over again, but it's not just "The XYZ Person Show".