Originally Posted by mlt11:
“I would go with ITV's decision on both MDs.
I think each MD is considered on its own merits. There would have been no issue showing Man C on MD6 as well if their game had been critical.
On MD4, Man C was the obvious choice. They were in a highly critical situation whereas Arsenal were always heavy odds on favourites to qualify.
Re MD6 I think the over-riding thing is that ITV1 are showing the CL and Arsenal's game is the only game relevant to the CL. Winning the group is of significance so Arsenal's game is of some significance.
Yes, Man C's game is relevant to the EL but that's a very secondary competition. It's also questionnable how seriously Man C will take the game as they may not actually really want to go into the EL anyway.
Not showing Man C all 3 times could be thrown into the pot if it was a genuine 50:50 decision but for the above reasons I don't think it actually is.”
On MD4, Arsenal had to win if they wanted to stay clear of a chasing Olympiacos, and it wasn't likely after they were beaten at home by Schalke. Realistically, City were never going to get out of their group with 1 point from 3 games.
Whilst the EL, as you mlt11 says, is 'a very secondary competition', ITV have a 3 year contract to show the best 2 games each matchday. If City were to end up in the EL, then it could be used as a cross-competition promotion, to try and get more people interested in watching ITV4.
I have to say, in terms of looking for good rating football matches, ITV are pretty bloody awful at choosing them. No semi-final at the Euros, Udinese v Braga in Play-off round, Man City in MD4 and now Arsenal for MD6. I think they need new people, who know a little more about football, to choose their matches.