• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 43)
<<
<
83 of 143
>>
>
F1Ken
06-12-2012
Originally Posted by square_eyes:
“Sunday - Downton Abbey
Monday - Doc Martin
Thursday - Whitechapel
Friday - Benidorm

Would be a really strong schedule”

That would be bullet proof.

BUT.

The rest of the year would be as weak as a rotten bus.

Ken
Brekkie
06-12-2012
Originally Posted by iaindb:
“Source?

Or are we now having fantasy newspaper reports as well as fantasy TV schedules in this thread now?

Not quite sure why BBC1 would complain about CTM having a 60 minute head-start on DA or why they think viewers to choose to watch CTM for a hour and then not bother to see the end. Unless they know the Christmas episode is crap and that people will be looking for any excuse to switch off.

Nor do I see what advantage ITV get starting DA fifteen minutes from the end of CTM. And if they wanted a clash, why have they stuck the News into the schedule at 8.30? Why not just run Corrie into Downton?



The News proves this story is total tripe. Now if it said that ITV changed the schedule to give Corrie a head start on CTM, that would make sense.

edit: And that still wouldn't explain why they've stuck the news on at 8.30. Why not just run Corrie into Downton Abbey? ”

In reality it's the BBC who have played the dirty tricks by putting Call the Midwife in a 75 minute slot rather than 60 minutes, meaning ITV had to do something - and in the end they've done the most innocent thing they can do and put the news in the slot to make up the difference. Extending Strictly and CTM to 75 minutes made it quite difficult for ITV to schedule against - based on the original timing I'd have put Emmerdale at 6.30pm and 8.30pm and Corrie at 7.30pm, but that still leaves 30 minutes to fill at 7pm - a shortened POGDOGs perhaps, but not much else they could put there.

Originally Posted by RobbieSykes123:
“The Town's a tanker then.

ITV Drama is a bit of a damaged brand. They've only really got Downton (which many people subconsciously think is a BBC show because it feels like one) and the soapier dramas featuring ex Corrie stars and targeted directly at Corrie watchers.

It's the same old stars, the same old routine, the same old writers.

At least BBC1 tries something different drama wise in amongst the grim or plodding crime procedurals - would ITV have ever done Sherlock, Jonathan Creek, Luther, Five Days?

Even mundane ITV Drama-by-numbers core-demographic stuff from Sally Wainwright is on BBC1 these days...”

Aren't Sherlock, Jonathan Creek and Luther all basically plodding crime pocedurals anyway. ITV have taken many risks in the drama department over the last couple of years, but on the whole they don't seem to pay off - and then people like you (well, just you really) come here the next day, gloat about the poor ratings then say ITV do the same thing all the time. BBC1's drama cupboard isn't exactly full to bursting at the moment either.
Ads
06-12-2012
The Town did better than I thought it would, it didn't really seem like the normal ITV1 drama fit.

The real flop at 9pm was the Hour, it was never a huge hit before, but seems to have lost half its audience compared to last season.
jake lyle
06-12-2012
Originally Posted by F1Ken:
“That would be bullet proof.

BUT.

The rest of the year would be as weak as a rotten bus.

Ken”

Indeed the phrase shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic springs to mind.
Score
06-12-2012
Originally Posted by jake lyle:
“Indeed the phrase shuffling deck chairs on the Titanic springs to mind.”

I believe all four of them are confirmed for the Autumn so that lineup actually seems pretty realistic.

They've got enough returners earlier in the year to keep them going like Scott & Bailey, Vera, Law & Order, Endeavour etc but they seem to be focusing more on new titles in the first half of next year. We'll soon see if it pays off.
wizzywick
06-12-2012
Originally Posted by Brekkie:
“In reality it's the BBC who have played the dirty tricks by putting Call the Midwife in a 75 minute slot rather than 60 minutes, meaning ITV had to do something - and in the end they've done the most innocent thing they can do and put the news in the slot to make up the difference. Extending Strictly and CTM to 75 minutes made it quite difficult for ITV to schedule against - based on the original timing I'd have put Emmerdale at 6.30pm and 8.30pm and Corrie at 7.30pm, but that still leaves 30 minutes to fill at 7pm - a shortened POGDOGs perhaps, but not much else they could put there.


Aren't Sherlock, Jonathan Creek and Luther all basically plodding crime pocedurals anyway. ITV have taken many risks in the drama department over the last couple of years, but on the whole they don't seem to pay off - and then people like you (well, just you really) come here the next day, gloat about the poor ratings then say ITV do the same thing all the time. BBC1's drama cupboard isn't exactly full to bursting at the moment either.”

So the BBC are not allowed to have programmes of certain length to make it easier for ITV? What piffle! The schedules were perfectly fine as they were. No programme clashed and DA had the prime 9pm slot. It was ITV who forced the move for Midwife!
D.M.N.
06-12-2012
Originally Posted by jda135:
“D.M.N do you have Daybreak's ratings (and shares) between September and November last year)? BTW, thanks very much for your full daily ratings roundups. Hugely helpful and very interesting.”

I do, but it would take a bit of effort to find them and copy/paste them all out as most of them are within 0.2m - from 0.6m to 0.8m to be honest. If you search back through the thread you should be able to find some though.

Originally Posted by Glenn A:
“Anyone know how the football did on SS1 and SS4 HD? The reason I'm asking is the pub seemed to be quite busy last night with people wanting to watch the games( the pub has two televisions, which split between games and sports).”

Tuesday 4th December 2012
Sky Sports 1
19:30 to 22:00 - Soccer Special: 67k (0.3%)
* peak: 140k (0.6%) at 21:40

Sky Sports 2
19:00 to 22:00 - Borussia Dortmund vs Manchester City: 421k (1.8%)
* peak: 696k (2.9%) at 21:00

Sky Sports 4
19:30 to 22:00 - Real Madrid vs Ajax: 53k (0.2%)
* peak: 104k (0.4%) at 20:20

Sky Sports News
19:30 to 22:00 - Soccer Special: 114k (0.5%)
* peak: 217k (0.9%) at 21:35

Combined Sky Sports 1, 2, 4 and News Peak
=> 937k (3.90%) at 21:00
- 696k (2.90%) on Sky Sports 2
- 143k (0.60%) on Sky Sports News
- 54k (0.22%) on Sky Sports 4
- 44k (0.18%) on Sky Sports 1

Wednesday 5th November 2012
Sky Sports 1
19:30 to 22:00 - Soccer Special: 64k (0.3%)
* peak: 131k (0.6%) at 21:40

Sky Sports 2
18:00 to 22:00 - Chelsea vs FC Nordsjaelland: 391k (1.7%)
* 19:30 to 22:00 - 556k (2.4%)
* peak: 733k (3.1%) at 20:20

Sky Sports 3
19:30 to 22:00 - Celtic vs Spartak Moscow: 398k (1.7%)
* peak: 724k (3.1%) at 21:35

Sky Sports 4
19:30 to 22:00 - Manchester United vs CFR Cluj: 502k (2.2%)
* peak: 688k (3.0%) at 21:25

Sky Sports News
19:30 to 22:00 - Soccer Special: 110k (0.5%)
* peak: 277k (1.2%) at 21:40

Combined Sky Sports Peak (excluding F1)
- Sky Sports channels averaged 1.63m (7.0%) from 19:30 to 22:00
=> 2.26m (10.0%) at 21:30
- 721k (3.2%) on Sky Sports 3
- 677k (3.0%) on Sky Sports 4
- 567k (2.5%) on Sky Sports 2
- 198k (0.9%) on Sky Sports News
- 93k (0.4%) on Sky Sports 1
Servalan
06-12-2012
Originally Posted by Brekkie:
“Aren't Sherlock, Jonathan Creek and Luther all basically plodding crime pocedurals anyway. ITV have taken many risks in the drama department over the last couple of years, but on the whole they don't seem to pay off - and then people like you (well, just you really) come here the next day, gloat about the poor ratings then say ITV do the same thing all the time. BBC1's drama cupboard isn't exactly full to bursting at the moment either.”

Sorry, but what risks has ITV taken in drama?

Its drama commissions have been virtually risk-free. Downton Abbey may have been a huge financial risk but, content-wise, it was as safe as they come. Scott & Bailey = Cagney & Lacey, Monroe = House, and they even ripped off one of their own untransmitted series (Bombshell) for Homefront.

ITV has always been about getting bums on seats - but, historically, it always managed some innovation as well ... think Rock Follies, Prime Suspect or Cracker. I would love to see ITV rediscover some of its old verve - but I fear the current commissioning team doesn't have it in them ...
Charnham
06-12-2012
over nights are increasing irrelevant
Wryip
06-12-2012
Originally Posted by Charnham:
“over nights are increasing irrelevant”

for public funded broadcasters perhaps

The main thing to take away from that is that only around 70% of viewers watch in the 5 metro, meaning including regional viewers overnights should be at least 50% higher. More relevant to Seven and Nine than Ten perhaps, considering Ten doesn't show adverts in regional areas (just the same old tourist promotion clips), Nine has a rotation of about 10 adverts (womens bra adverts are a norm whilst watching cricket or the footy) and even Seven relies heavily on repetition. I'm surprised Tasmania isn't treated as a market, but other than that viewers in regional areas are just not worth the value in money (and one wonders why Ten even broadcasts at all - Imparja which runs Nine's programmes used to be a mix of Nine and Ten, considering the amount of rubbish on both of them a joint venture is probably a wiser idea)
Brekkie
06-12-2012
Originally Posted by D.M.N.:
“Tuesday 4th December 2012
Sky Sports 1
19:30 to 22:00 - Soccer Special: 67k (0.3%)
* peak: 140k (0.6%) at 21:40

Sky Sports 2
19:00 to 22:00 - Borussia Dortmund vs Manchester City: 421k (1.8%)
* peak: 696k (2.9%) at 21:00

Sky Sports 4
19:30 to 22:00 - Real Madrid vs Ajax: 53k (0.2%)
* peak: 104k (0.4%) at 20:20

Sky Sports News
19:30 to 22:00 - Soccer Special: 114k (0.5%)
* peak: 217k (0.9%) at 21:35

Combined Sky Sports 1, 2, 4 and News Peak
=> 937k (3.90%) at 21:00
- 696k (2.90%) on Sky Sports 2
- 143k (0.60%) on Sky Sports News
- 54k (0.22%) on Sky Sports 4
- 44k (0.18%) on Sky Sports 1

Wednesday 5th November 2012
Sky Sports 1
19:30 to 22:00 - Soccer Special: 64k (0.3%)
* peak: 131k (0.6%) at 21:40

Sky Sports 2
18:00 to 22:00 - Chelsea vs FC Nordsjaelland: 391k (1.7%)
* 19:30 to 22:00 - 556k (2.4%)
* peak: 733k (3.1%) at 20:20

Sky Sports 3
19:30 to 22:00 - Celtic vs Spartak Moscow: 398k (1.7%)
* peak: 724k (3.1%) at 21:35

Sky Sports 4
19:30 to 22:00 - Manchester United vs CFR Cluj: 502k (2.2%)
* peak: 688k (3.0%) at 21:25”

Celtic held up quite nicely compared to the competition there, so may not be a complete disaster for ITV if they get a nice draw, and ITV would probably benefit more if they get the second leg of their game.

Talking of Chelsea anyone know who is broadcasting the FIFA Club World Cup in which they'll play next week?
Georged123
06-12-2012
Originally Posted by Brekkie:
“In reality it's the BBC who have played the dirty tricks by putting Call the Midwife in a 75 minute slot rather than 60 minutes, meaning ITV had to do something - and in the end they've done the most innocent thing they can do and put the news in the slot to make up the difference. Extending Strictly and CTM to 75 minutes made it quite difficult for ITV to schedule against - based on the original timing I'd have put Emmerdale at 6.30pm and 8.30pm and Corrie at 7.30pm, but that still leaves 30 minutes to fill at 7pm - a shortened POGDOGs perhaps, but not much else they could put there.”

How dare the BBC show extended specials of their shows at Christmas. It's not like any other channel has ever shown a longer than usual show at Christmas. And it's good to see that ITV haven't responded to these rotten tricks by the Beeb and kept Paul O'Grady's Dogs to it's usual one hour length and Downton is still it's usual two hour length...

Quote:
“Aren't Sherlock, Jonathan Creek and Luther all basically plodding crime pocedurals anyway. ITV have taken many risks in the drama department over the last couple of years, but on the whole they don't seem to pay off - and then people like you (well, just you really) come here the next day, gloat about the poor ratings then say ITV do the same thing all the time. BBC1's drama cupboard isn't exactly full to bursting at the moment either.”

Plodding crime procedurals? Dear me.
Charnham
06-12-2012
Originally Posted by Wryip:
“for public funded broadcasters perhaps

The main thing to take away from that is that only around 70% of viewers watch in the 5 metro, meaning including regional viewers overnights should be at least 50% higher. More relevant to Seven and Nine than Ten perhaps, considering Ten doesn't show adverts in regional areas (just the same old tourist promotion clips), Nine has a rotation of about 10 adverts (womens bra adverts are a norm whilst watching cricket or the footy) and even Seven relies heavily on repetition. I'm surprised Tasmania isn't treated as a market, but other than that viewers in regional areas are just not worth the value in money (and one wonders why Ten even broadcasts at all - Imparja which runs Nine's programmes used to be a mix of Nine and Ten, considering the amount of rubbish on both of them a joint venture is probably a wiser idea)”

the regional ratings in Australia are interesting, but this article also talks about all the discussion around overnight figures, vs Consolidated ratings, that dont get in the press as often, and are not always as well discussed in this thread as they should be. Even the much discussed soap ratings, dont have their consolidated ratings discussed in this thread, beyond the (also increasing irrelevant) BBC 3 vs +1 arguement
Drifter
06-12-2012
Originally Posted by Servalan:
“Sorry, but what risks has ITV taken in drama?

Its drama commissions have been virtually risk-free. Downton Abbey may have been a huge financial risk but, content-wise, it was as safe as they come. Scott & Bailey = Cagney & Lacey, Monroe = House, and they even ripped off one of their own untransmitted series (Bombshell) for Homefront.
...”

Given no one has ever seen Bombshell other than, presumably, those at ITV and what not, how the hell do we know it was anything like Homefront? The army connection is the only tenuous link there. Bombshell sounded like Bad Girls army style. I suspect the inaccuracies (and maybe glamorizing?) of army life were borderline offensive going by other Shed productions. But who knows. Scrapping something (with at least one known name) seems extreme so something must have been badly amiss, and I'm not sure it was entirely to do with quality..

And while ITV clearly haven't been innovative, the likes of Mrs Biggs and The Bletchley Circle were at least a bit different. The latter probably deserved better. The usual subject matter (DCI Banks, Scott and Bailey) seem to perform better so it's no wonder these sort of shows keep appearing.

I'd like to see them really branch out and have more fantasy/horror/sci-fi related stuff, but presumably the cost makes the risk so hard to take...
cylon6
06-12-2012
Originally Posted by Brekkie:
“In reality it's the BBC who have played the dirty tricks by putting Call the Midwife in a 75 minute slot rather than 60 minutes, meaning ITV had to do something - and in the end they've done the most innocent thing they can do and put the news in the slot to make up the difference. Extending Strictly and CTM to 75 minutes made it quite difficult for ITV to schedule against - based on the original timing I'd have put Emmerdale at 6.30pm and 8.30pm and Corrie at 7.30pm, but that still leaves 30 minutes to fill at 7pm - a shortened POGDOGs perhaps, but not much else they could put there.”

It's the BBC's fault for making Call The Midwife 75 minutes? Erm Downton Abbey is usually an hour long and it is now 2 hours on Christmas Day. Only Fools And Horses was a half hour sitcom until it was turned into a 75 minute show in 1985. TV channels can extend shows if they want.

This makes no sense. None.

Quote:
“Aren't Sherlock, Jonathan Creek and Luther all basically plodding crime pocedurals anyway. ITV have taken many risks in the drama department over the last couple of years, but on the whole they don't seem to pay off - and then people like you (well, just you really) come here the next day, gloat about the poor ratings then say ITV do the same thing all the time. BBC1's drama cupboard isn't exactly full to bursting at the moment either.”

PLODDING!?!

They are crime dramas just like ITV have them. What makes them work is how you put them onscreen.
cylon6
06-12-2012
Originally Posted by Ads:
“The Town did better than I thought it would, it didn't really seem like the normal ITV1 drama fit.

The real flop at 9pm was the Hour, it was never a huge hit before, but seems to have lost half its audience compared to last season.”

The Hour is a triumph of style over substance. It's not as good as it thinks it is.
cylon6
06-12-2012
Thanks for the ratings DMN.
D.M.N.
06-12-2012
New daytime quiz announced for BBC One by the way - 'Beat the Pack' presented by Jake Humphrey - filming in February and March.
Drifter
06-12-2012
Also how common is it for shows that have had their debut in a year, get a prime Christmas Day slot the very same year? BBC obviously have Midwife, while ITV have err, the dog show which literally only started a couple of months ago!

I don't blame them for doing it though, I'm not sure what else they're supposed to do so may as well throw a wildcard out there that's been successful in its slot. Although that makes you wonder why The Chase didn't get a go too.

Emmerdale thrown to the wolves I see. But after that the evening will be interesting. Definitely going to see the peaks around the 8.30-8.45 period with all sorts of channel hopping going on. I don't think the news is a bad thing, no one is going to bother with the last 15 minutes of midwife unless they are already watching or turning over for Eastenders (which is likely). If Corrie does a reasonable amount of 7 million plus and many stay for Downton (and I have no idea how that will work, will the Corrie viewers switch for EE or be more Downton orientated?) combined with Midwife viewers switching to Downton, it could still win the night. Then again, will that be too much drama (let's face it, EE is easier to watch) and will most Midwife viewers be EE viewers anyway?

My head hurts thinking about this but at the very least it'll be an interesting night
RobbieSykes123
06-12-2012
Originally Posted by Georged123:
“How dare the BBC show extended specials of their shows at Christmas. It's not like any other channel has ever shown a longer than usual show at Christmas. And it's good to see that ITV haven't responded to these rotten tricks by the Beeb and kept Paul O'Grady's Dogs to it's usual one hour length and Downton is still it's usual two hour length...


Plodding crime procedurals? Dear me.”

Couldn't have put it better Georged

Dear me indeed!
Drifter
06-12-2012
I was also going to ask what the hell this was from Christmas Day 2004 (thanks to whoever posted that list of ratings from the last decade):

10 …. 5.88 …. Christmas Night With The Stars (19:10) BBC1

Until I looked it up and realized it was obviously once an established show. But that just sounds terrible beyond belief and the rating isn't great. Was it really that bad? Even nearly 10 years later it's hard to imagine BBC1 going that low in primetime Christmas Day in terms of content and ratings.
wizzywick
06-12-2012
Originally Posted by Drifter:
“I was also going to ask what the hell this was from Christmas Day 2004 (thanks to whoever posted that list of ratings from the last decade):

10 …. 5.88 …. Christmas Night With The Stars (19:10) BBC1

Until I looked it up and realized it was obviously once an established show. But that just sounds terrible beyond belief and the rating isn't great. Was it really that bad? Even nearly 10 years later it's hard to imagine BBC1 going that low in primetime Christmas Day in terms of content and ratings.”

Ah! That was actually 2003! Possibly one of the worst Christmas night schedules of recent years. The big comedy that year was Absolutely Fabulous, French and Saunders, The Office and the last OFAH. Only OFAH was on Christmas night with the other comedies on Christmas Eve and Boxing Day. 2004 was a pretty good line up:

5.35 Alistair McGowans' Big Impressions
6.05 Film Premiere: Harry Potter and the Philosophers Stone
8.25 EastEnders
9.25 The Vicar of Dibley
10.20 BBC News
10.30 Absolutely Fabulous
Drifter
06-12-2012
I've just checked it on imdb...love the user rating. The performer list is wonderfully dire...

Victoria Beckham
Emma Bunton
Busted
Kelly Osbourne

It's like something ITV would have cobbled together in 2005.

I thought the original concept (from what I've read) is that it featured short segments of popular comedies...so what's with the random musical "pleasures"?
Charnham
06-12-2012
why is Pudsey the Dog, mentioned so much in the BBC 1 Christmas trailer?
Score
06-12-2012
Originally Posted by Charnham:
“why is Pudsey the Dog, mentioned so much in the BBC 1 Christmas trailer?”

He's in Mr Stink.
<<
<
83 of 143
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map