• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Will BB6 Be Better?
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
Kristina
18-12-2004
LOL , some people on here have a serious stress problem. Give them a fag.
DaMaNiAc
19-12-2004
nadia really wasn't that interesting to watch. they should never have given her extra fags, after that it just became a farse.

The whole point is they use their budget to allow for that. It's too bad if there is someone who smokes a ridiculous amount of cigarettes a day, she should have just cut down rather than just having a temper-tantrum like a 2-year-old and getting away with it.

BB's producers just showed in that moment how weak they are and how biased the show was in her favour.
WalfordWill
19-12-2004
Hard to say really, BB5 was a brilliant 10 weeks, I'll wait til I hear details of BB6 before I say anything.
Kristina
19-12-2004
Originally Posted by DaMaNiAc:
“nadia really wasn't that interesting to watch. they should never have given her extra fags, after that it just became a farse.

The whole point is they use their budget to allow for that. It's too bad if there is someone who smokes a ridiculous amount of cigarettes a day, she should have just cut down rather than just having a temper-tantrum like a 2-year-old and getting away with it.

BB's producers just showed in that moment how weak they are and how biased the show was in her favour.”

I can't imagine BB5 without Nadia! How can you say she wasn't very interesting to watch when she made most of the excitement. If they didn't give Nad extra fags then she would of left and wouldn't of won the show. BB5 without Nadia would be like a f**king sandwich without it's filling.
Electra
19-12-2004
How can you say she made most of the excitement? She tended to demand that others entertain her. don't get me wrong, I liked her in the house. Just thought that was an inaccurate statement.
Kristina
19-12-2004
Originally Posted by Electra:
“How can you say she made most of the excitement? She tended to demand that others entertain her. don't get me wrong, I liked her in the house. Just thought that was an inaccurate statement.”

Well can you imagine the Big Brother house being exciting without Nadia? I certainly can't.
Kristina
19-12-2004
Originally Posted by DaMaNiAc:
“The whole point is they use their budget to allow for that. It's too bad if there is someone who smokes a ridiculous amount of cigarettes a day, she should have just cut down rather than just having a temper-tantrum like a 2-year-old and getting away with it.”

All chain-smokers act stressed when they don't have cigarettes so why pin-point Nadia out?Just sit back, have a fag and chill, Nadia didn't act like a 2 year old at all, she just needed a fag like any chain smoker would, leave her alone!
koantemplation
19-12-2004
Originally Posted by Kristina:
“All chain-smokers act stressed when they don't have cigarettes so why pin-point Nadia out?Just sit back, have a fag and chill, Nadia didn't act like a 2 year old at all, she just needed a fag like any chain smoker would, leave her alone!”


Oh come on, I'm not anti Nadia, but she did throw a tantrum when she couldn't get any ciggies. Dependancy or not, she was a grown adult who knew she might be rationed before she went in and should have acted in a more mature manner than she did. There are people sleeping on the streets who act with more self respect than she did.
Kristina
19-12-2004
Originally Posted by mrfreeze:
“Oh come on, I'm not anti Nadia, but she did throw a tantrum when she couldn't get any ciggies. Dependancy or not, she was a grown adult who knew she might be rationed before she went in and should have acted in a more mature manner than she did. There are people sleeping on the streets who act with more self respect than she did.”

She was moody because chain smokers get moody when they don't have cigarettes!It's normal for them! She had enough self respect for all her fans to love her as much as we do so just leave it yeah.
koantemplation
19-12-2004
Originally Posted by Kristina:
“She was moody because chain smokers get moody when they don't have cigarettes!It's normal for them! She had enough self respect for all her fans to love her as much as we do so just leave it yeah.”

Drugies get moody, she went nutz.
No way was that a ciggie withdrawal problem, more like a mental health one, if you ask me.
Myfanwy
19-12-2004
Originally Posted by mrfreeze:
“Drugies get moody, she went nutz.
No way was that a ciggie withdrawal problem, more like a mental health one, if you ask me. ”

You underestimate the power of nicotine MrFreeze.


Cxx
cheeks
19-12-2004
Originally Posted by Kristina:
“Well can you imagine the Big Brother house being exciting without Nadia? I certainly can't.”

I can easy,it doesn't take too much imagination
koantemplation
19-12-2004
Originally Posted by Myfanwy:
“You underestimate the power of nicotine MrFreeze.
Cxx”

Nadia's tantrum was because of her personality not her difficulty with ther withdrawal symptoms.
Kristina
19-12-2004
For the love of god, Leave her alone!
skazza
20-12-2004
Originally Posted by Kristina:
“For the love of god, Leave her alone!”

I agree. We should stop talking about Nadia, and let her slip into obscurity.
Veri
20-12-2004
BB5 was good in parts, but there were long boring stretches as well, and others that were irritating as well. BB6 could easily be better.
Kristina
20-12-2004
Originally Posted by skazza:
“I agree. We should stop talking about Nadia, and let her slip into obscurity. ”

I just think you should give critisising her a permanent rest. It's not clever or funny, just very shallow, and so is critisising other hm's that don't deserve it. Unnessesary however you spell it. I know it's a forum where people are entitled to give their opinions but the critisism just goes overboard and causes upsets to fans.
CLL Dodge
20-12-2004
Nadia wasn't my favourite but I can see why she won. And after BB4 it was good to see a winner who wasn't afraid to voice an opinion and make trouble when the need arose. She'll be remembered long after Cameron or Craig, at least.
yahoodlums
20-12-2004
Originally Posted by john-john:
“BB5 would have been a lot better if the jacuzzi could have been turned into a giant blender at the flick of a switch.”

LOL and I mean LOL!!!
DaMaNiAc
20-12-2004
Originally Posted by Kristina:
“I can't imagine BB5 without Nadia! How can you say she wasn't very interesting to watch when she made most of the excitement. If they didn't give Nad extra fags then she would of left and wouldn't of won the show. BB5 without Nadia would be like a f**king sandwich without it's filling.”

Thats exactly what I was trying to say. If she hadn't been given extra favours then she would have walked. Endemol had it planned from the start that she would win so gave into all of her demands to keep her in.
Kristina
20-12-2004
They didn't have it planned for her to win at all. That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard!
FinalBroadcast
20-12-2004
Originally Posted by Kristina:
“They didn't have it planned for her to win at all. That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard!”

I'm not generally one for all these conspiracy theories, but it does look odd to be honest, that Nadia received extra cigarettes when she was thinking of walking. The whole point of BB being "evil" was ruined in one second when they bowed down to her.
Mesostim
20-12-2004
Nadia was certainly given more concessions than the others. When things didn;t go her way she certainly let everyone know about it. Giving her the extra cigarettes was taking it to far however......that smacked of favoritism or a collapse of control by Big Bro....but the speed with which they caved in to Nadia's demands hints strongly that she had enormous support with them....
Mesostim
20-12-2004
Originally Posted by Kristina:
“I just think you should give critisising her a permanent rest. It's not clever or funny, just very shallow, and so is critisising other hm's that don't deserve it. Unnessesary however you spell it. I know it's a forum where people are entitled to give their opinions but the critisism just goes overboard and causes upsets to fans.”

Simply not going to happen Kristina....ever. This isn't a fan site, it's a discussion forum.
john-john
20-12-2004
Originally Posted by Kristina:
“I just think you should give critisising her a permanent rest. It's not clever or funny, just very shallow, and so is critisising other hm's that don't deserve it. Unnessesary however you spell it. I know it's a forum where people are entitled to give their opinions but the critisism just goes overboard and causes upsets to fans.”



People are free to say what they want on here within reason, so please by all means post your own opinions, but don't tell anyone else to shut up.

I happen to find childish, sycophantic scribblings about how nice Marco or Nadia or Emma or Michelle is pretty offensive - how someone can go through several years of schooling and still have a head so full of broken bottles that they think Nadia is someone we should all aspire to is beyond me... but everyone is entitled to their opinion.

As pointed out more than once recently, this is a discussion forum NOT a fan site. If you want to chat with pure fans, then feel free to go to a fan site.
<<
<
2 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map