I think the vote will be changing on a daily basis. A lot of people who vote will probably like a few of them and will vote based on what is happening on the show that day. Campmates likeability has been changing daily and I think the vote will reflect this. I don't think the winner is clear cut!
Logic says there can only be one winner...
2 of 2
Originally Posted by jimdan:
“Rosemary had a great chance with her support increasing as others failed to shine but increasingly her true colours have shown her up to be a fraud with a bad attitude, Her spat with Hugo was the nail in her coffin.
Hugo started off very badly complaining about everything and everyone. The little posh boy with attitude has however managed to stay one step ahead of the relegation zone but he would need a miracle to win from so far back.
Charlie has let her guard down several times and her obvious jealousy of Helen showed up her bitchy side. She has been draining support for the past week.
Eric is love/hate character and only half the public get his humour, so he just can't win. A point he himself acknowledges.
Ashley is the latest fad and overall she has played a blinder although her cunning "outing" of firstly Helen over the towel and Rosemary when she defied basic hygene rules, did not go unnoticed. However it would be very unusual for an American to win IAC and she may not get all the support she needs to go better than Queen of the jungle.
David Hayes is the choice of the majority of the ex jungle celebs because of his kind and thoughtful personality. Granted he isn't too much fun in his efficient execution of the tasks but the word "fear" isn't in the mans vocabulary.
David appears to be sitting in third place in the polls, not far behind the front runners, so he doesn't have to do much more to win in a year where so many have simply blown their chances after gaining popularity.
He is the logical winner.”
“Rosemary had a great chance with her support increasing as others failed to shine but increasingly her true colours have shown her up to be a fraud with a bad attitude, Her spat with Hugo was the nail in her coffin.
Hugo started off very badly complaining about everything and everyone. The little posh boy with attitude has however managed to stay one step ahead of the relegation zone but he would need a miracle to win from so far back.
Charlie has let her guard down several times and her obvious jealousy of Helen showed up her bitchy side. She has been draining support for the past week.
Eric is love/hate character and only half the public get his humour, so he just can't win. A point he himself acknowledges.
Ashley is the latest fad and overall she has played a blinder although her cunning "outing" of firstly Helen over the towel and Rosemary when she defied basic hygene rules, did not go unnoticed. However it would be very unusual for an American to win IAC and she may not get all the support she needs to go better than Queen of the jungle.
David Hayes is the choice of the majority of the ex jungle celebs because of his kind and thoughtful personality. Granted he isn't too much fun in his efficient execution of the tasks but the word "fear" isn't in the mans vocabulary.
David appears to be sitting in third place in the polls, not far behind the front runners, so he doesn't have to do much more to win in a year where so many have simply blown their chances after gaining popularity.
He is the logical winner.”
Common sense tells me that there is usually only ONE WINNER
Originally Posted by patsylimerick:
“Listen, I've brothers who specialise in this kind of thing. You'd want a suit of armour at a family gathering. It's hilarious and great fun and I can give as good as I get, but I've cringed with embarrassment when the less enlightened new additions (girlfriends/boyfriends) get the full treatment. It's cruel and unnecessary and all a bit too try hard. Eric jumped the shark for me with the comments about Helen's skin. Nasty stuff and it didn't even get him the laughs he so obviously craves.
I did warm to Eric last night. He did well on the trial, his wit WAS more self-deprecating and I loved how he called Rosemary out after the Hugo row. Funnily enough, even though I was anything but a Helen fan, I can't get past the comments about Helen's skin. That was just cruel and mean and picking on someone who is clearly thick. Not clever.”
“Listen, I've brothers who specialise in this kind of thing. You'd want a suit of armour at a family gathering. It's hilarious and great fun and I can give as good as I get, but I've cringed with embarrassment when the less enlightened new additions (girlfriends/boyfriends) get the full treatment. It's cruel and unnecessary and all a bit too try hard. Eric jumped the shark for me with the comments about Helen's skin. Nasty stuff and it didn't even get him the laughs he so obviously craves.
I did warm to Eric last night. He did well on the trial, his wit WAS more self-deprecating and I loved how he called Rosemary out after the Hugo row. Funnily enough, even though I was anything but a Helen fan, I can't get past the comments about Helen's skin. That was just cruel and mean and picking on someone who is clearly thick. Not clever.”
The irony of your post is at the very end. Calling somebody thick is also in my book demeaning. In other words everybody says something under intense scrutiny which could be taken as bad but others believe not so bad. Eric is no different. Deep down I find him quite endearing despite the skin comment to Helen.
Originally Posted by jimdan:
“Ashley is the latest fad and overall she has played a blinder although her cunning "outing" of firstly Helen over the towel and Rosemary when she defied basic hygene rules, did not go unnoticed. However it would be very unusual for an American to win IAC and she may not get all the support she needs to go better than Queen of the jungle.
He is the logical winner.”
“Ashley is the latest fad and overall she has played a blinder although her cunning "outing" of firstly Helen over the towel and Rosemary when she defied basic hygene rules, did not go unnoticed. However it would be very unusual for an American to win IAC and she may not get all the support she needs to go better than Queen of the jungle.
He is the logical winner.”
There is no logical winner , the winner is the one most people pick up the phone for and thats the one they empathise with
As for Ashleys "cunning outings " She searched for a towel she had left washed and dried and asked who took it .? She was fuly entitled to look for it , it was hers .
She stopped Rosemary breaking one of the major rules in cookery and well done to her , it could have caused salmonella and spread through the whole group ./I found it brave of Ashley to speak up .
I really wouldn't mind David winning, there must be a good reason why all the evicted campmates like him so much. The only other ones who've been mentioned are Eric, Charlie and Rosemary ( as an afterthought ).
2 of 2
