Originally Posted by FingersAndToes:
“Charlie had to have agreed beforehand they could have shown her daughter or she was allowed to be on the show. She was in the known, and agreed to it. The producers just cannot go and put people's children on their shows without parental approval.
Charley agreed to this, and then played it up for the cameras.”
I would really, really hate to live in such a world of cynicism. Of
course Charlie didn't know, any more than Eric did; I am astonished that any parent would not see that it was upsetting for her to know that her little girl could hear her choosing another door, even though Charlie quickly calmed down and acknowledged that it was just part of the game.
There is no reason in the world, other than a desire to discredit Charlie that does no one any credit, to suppose that Charlie had the faintest inkling of what was happening. None of them did. They may indeed have asked her if she minded Kiki being shown during the series since all contestants are met by their families on the bridge. Or they may not, since children appear on tv every day of the year in background shots and accompanying adults, and contrary to this convenient let's-abuse-Charlie fantasy, of course no permission is needed.
I can't understand the endless sneers of people every time someone on a tv show misses their young child that 'you shouldn't have left them then'. People often work away for a period; three weeks is far shorter than many people leave children for, and there is nothing more natural than to have a short time away from your child but to miss them painfully even so. I really think some people have
incredibly closed minds.