Digital Spy

Search Digital Spy
 

DS Forums

 
 

Peter Andre - even more chapters of "his life"


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22-01-2013, 21:46
lexi22
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,426
Their history preceeds them. If people doubt them, they only have themselves to blame since they've both made a living from using others to leak info while maintaining faux indignant innocence.

A cheap PR tactic to keep a client in the headlines.

But I guess there's always a first time for them to be telling the truth...

ETA: The DM link to which I'm referring...
lexi22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 22-01-2013, 22:29
Like an Onion
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,580
I am going to give PA the benefit of the doubt here... to be honest I think he is still grieving and therefore doesn't really care what the media is saying about him... if it didn't have such an impact on the children he wouldn't give a s*it what KP is doing... there is nothing in the article someone has not said on here so it is a fairly safe bet that PA is saying it as well... but if he was leaking it there would be more detail on how the children are taking it.

KP's statement is laughable as a preemptive strike apart from making her look like she is too busy having sly digs at her ex than enjoying her current... is it just me or she is coming across as more and more obsessed with PA?.. why now?.. well to be honest why at all lol.
Like an Onion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2013, 22:36
lexi22
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,426
I am going to give PA the benefit of the doubt here... to be honest I think he is still grieving and therefore doesn't really care what the media is saying about him... if it didn't have such an impact on the children he wouldn't give a s*it what KP is doing... there is nothing in the article someone has not said on here so it is a fairly safe bet that PA is saying it as well... but if he was leaking it there would be more detail on how the children are taking it.
Funnily enough, when I read that DM article, my first thought was they just sent someone over to scour the DS Showbiz PA/KP threads and then made up a story using what they found!
lexi22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2013, 22:47
momma11
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,446
Funnily enough, when I read that DM article, my first thought was they just sent someone over to scour the DS Showbiz PA/KP threads and then made up a story using what they found!
That's what I thought !
momma11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2013, 22:53
Like an Onion
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,580
Funnily enough, when I read that DM article, my first thought was they just sent someone over to scour the DS Showbiz PA/KP threads and then made up a story using what they found!
That's what I thought !
Maybe we are the 'friends' the DM is quoting lmao... I would put nothing past them.
Like an Onion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2013, 23:05
momma11
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,446
Maybe we are the 'friends' the DM is quoting lmao... I would put nothing past them.
Fame at last !
momma11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2013, 23:13
lexi22
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,426
Maybe we are the 'friends' the DM is quoting lmao... I would put nothing past them.
Well if they're going to be slyly quoting us, they should at least give us our proper titles:

'...a defender insisted...' and '..a detractor assured us...'
lexi22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2013, 23:24
Nicola32
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,501
I agree that I don't think she has ever really got over PA. I wouldn't say he really doesn't care though. He might not love her any more, but he cares enough to talk about her all the time, and remind us all what a wonderful father he is at every available opportunity. If he has genuine concerns (and who could blame him?) the trash rags - or any press at all - is not the place to express them. Make no mistake, he is still hanging onto her coat-tails. I'm not saying he would want her back (although a reunion at some point in the future when both careers disappear even further down the toilet would not surprise me in the least), but he definitely still uses her name to promote his own.


He talks about her all the time??? He is still hanging on to her coat tails??? He uses her name to promote his own???

When was the last time he mentioned her? As far as im aware he hasn't spoken about her in a very long time.

He doesn't need to use her name to promote his own, he's doing perfectly well without her.

I think PA wishes to god he could forget she even exists.
Nicola32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-01-2013, 23:29
cazzz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,638
oi, you kept this quite Big Momma....you didn't mention your night with him
cazzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2013, 00:13
JamesJack1983
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 42
In one sentence one of you is saying he is grieving too much to be worried about discussing Katie, whilst another is saying that in one of the mags he proposed to Emily on their skiing break some 6 days after the funeral?

Whilst grief can bring to mind your own demise, I hardly think that grief and proposal go together within a week or so of the death and burial of your sibling?

As for the passing of information - true or false, you only have to look at the previous informant to the tabloids, whos last employer was forced to make several written apologies to Katie, and who now is side by side with Pete.

One group refuse to sign the contract supplied by Can due to the terms contained in it.
ie - "The interview will be about Peter Andre and the event only. ** online understands that they cannot ask any questions regarding anything else; anything asked will not be answered and will be removed from the copy without exception." "** online agrees to give Can Associates Limited full copy and headline approval of the interview, if approval is not agreed upon ** online understands that they cannot run the feature." "** online understands that no images of Katie Price can run with this feature relating to this feature at all." "** online, under all circumstances, must accompany the photographs of Peter Andre with positive text/captions/headings."
http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrit...d-peter-670101
So you think the press/magazines are writing the stories? Read the above - Explain why Can employes an ex journalist, then - Pull the other one!
JamesJack1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2013, 00:14
di60
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,344
haven't him and his management got a 250k lawsuit hanging over their heads?

he's hardly going to admit to 'smearing' his ex-wife is he?
di60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2013, 00:28
picklesandginge
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 451
One group refuse to sign the contract supplied by Can due to the terms contained in it.
ie - "The interview will be about Peter Andre and the event only. ** online understands that they cannot ask any questions regarding anything else; anything asked will not be answered and will be removed from the copy without exception." "** online agrees to give Can Associates Limited full copy and headline approval of the interview, if approval is not agreed upon ** online understands that they cannot run the feature." "** online understands that no images of Katie Price can run with this feature relating to this feature at all." "** online, under all circumstances, must accompany the photographs of Peter Andre with positive text/captions/headings."
http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrit...d-peter-670101
So you think the press/magazines are writing the stories? Read the above - Explain why Can employes an ex journalist, then - Pull the other one!
This is so interesting! I know most of magazines/newspapers usually only employ people who have undertaken a NCTJ or degree which include media law, and on top of that have a code of ethics which clearly prevent the publications running stories unless they come from a verified source or have conclusive proof.

Plus the fact KP and PA are so happy to sue anyone, makes you wonder why they don't sue when stories like this come out that they 'haven't commented on'.
picklesandginge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2013, 00:38
DiamondDoll
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 8,706
This is so interesting! I know most of magazines/newspapers usually only employ people who have undertaken a NCTJ or degree which include media law, and on top of that have a code of ethics which clearly prevent the publications running stories unless they come from a verified source or have conclusive proof.

Plus the fact KP and PA are so happy to sue anyone, makes you wonder why they don't sue when stories like this come out that they 'haven't commented on'.
Think about it though...............they'd be biting the hand that feeds them. If the media chose to stop reporting on them, it would be curtains for both of them.
DiamondDoll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2013, 00:51
Like an Onion
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,580
IMO PA does not give a crap what KP does as long as it does not impact on their children.

IMO PA is grieving so cares even less than usual about KP's antics... he hasn't been papped much and hasn't given any interviews since before his brother died... while many papers may be carrying the 'engagement' story it has not been mentioned let alone confirmed by PA or CAN.

IMO The papers in this country have no morals so a code of conduct is laughable in the extreme.

IMO GW is a tabloid hack no matter who or where she works and her language is recognisable... the quotes in the press read like this message board not PR.

IMO if PA had come out and condemned KP most people would have agreed with him... this revolving door of men is all when and good when you don't have children but absolutely selfish when you do... considering that PA must have known before the event even took place... since KP had told the children... he didn't capitalise on the knowledge.

Under these circumstances I am willing to give PA the benefit of the doubt... yes I have no doubt he is very angry and worried about how KP's behaviour is affecting their children but I don't think he has gone to the press... in fact every directly attributable piece of information has come from KP.

I do not know how anybody who behaves in this manner can blame anybody but themselves for the negative press they receive... there is no need to smear KP she is quite capable of doing it all by herself.

Disclaimer... the above is all my opinion/conclusions I have no proof... no facts... just an opinion on a forum... astonishing I know.
Like an Onion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2013, 01:07
JamesJack1983
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 42
Fully Agree with you Onion - she does herself no favours and deserves all she gets, but both are as bad as the other and do things that will impact on the children in the future, but, I am sure that Katie and Peter will ensure that their children will not have any problems.

Unfortunately , children are not provided with a manual - several people we might look at and say they should not have kids, but who are we to judge? 99.9% of us will make some errors in bringing up our children - thankfully most will recover and go on, not to do the same with theirs!! Others will ruin their kids lives forever
JamesJack1983 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2013, 08:30
BeethovensPiano
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ♫ At The Keyboard ♫
Posts: 10,414
This thread is funny lol
BeethovensPiano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2013, 08:33
sidsgirl
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,582
IMO PA does not give a crap what KP does as long as it does not impact on their children.

IMO PA is grieving so cares even less than usual about KP's antics... he hasn't been papped much and hasn't given any interviews since before his brother died... while many papers may be carrying the 'engagement' story it has not been mentioned let alone confirmed by PA or CAN.

IMO The papers in this country have no morals so a code of conduct is laughable in the extreme.

IMO GW is a tabloid hack no matter who or where she works and her language is recognisable... the quotes in the press read like this message board not PR.

IMO if PA had come out and condemned KP most people would have agreed with him... this revolving door of men is all when and good when you don't have children but absolutely selfish when you do... considering that PA must have known before the event even took place... since KP had told the children... he didn't capitalise on the knowledge.

Under these circumstances I am willing to give PA the benefit of the doubt... yes I have no doubt he is very angry and worried about how KP's behaviour is affecting their children but I don't think he has gone to the press... in fact every directly attributable piece of information has come from KP.

I do not know how anybody who behaves in this manner can blame anybody but themselves for the negative press they receive... there is no need to smear KP she is quite capable of doing it all by herself.

Disclaimer... the above is all my opinion/conclusions I have no proof... no facts... just an opinion on a forum... astonishing I know.

Excellent post LAO
sidsgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2013, 08:56
SenseiSam
Guest
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,625
Superb summary LAO - completely agree with every word. I don't agree with JamesJack that it's inconceivable that Pete could propose to Emily whilst grieving for his brother. She'd just helped him through the hardest time of his life so it might have focussed his mind and made him realise he didn't want to be without her. IF it is true I think they'll announce it when they're good and ready rather than have it dragged into the current media circus. And if it's true that Pete and Kate only communicate through lawyers now I hope he's in contact with Amy or brother Danny to discuss concerns about the impact on the children. They have a loving extended family caring for them so I'm sure they're doing all they can to keep things as normal as possible.
SenseiSam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2013, 09:05
momma11
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,446
oi, you kept this quite Big Momma....you didn't mention your night with him
A lady never tells

OI!! BIG MOMMA ? ...... hmph!!!!
momma11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2013, 09:27
lexi22
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 15,426
This is so interesting! I know most of magazines/newspapers usually only employ people who have undertaken a NCTJ or degree which include media law, and on top of that have a code of ethics which clearly prevent the publications running stories unless they come from a verified source or have conclusive proof.

Plus the fact KP and PA are so happy to sue anyone, makes you wonder why they don't sue when stories like this come out that they 'haven't commented on'.
If you look at the DM article, the sources for it are Heat, Closer and Now Mags. I see no reason whatsoever to doubt that these sources are 'helpful friends' speaking out on his behalf. Why should I believe anything different since it's par for the course with him and KP to use 'friends' to do exactly this? PA's hands may be technically clean but it all reeks of their usual MO. Like I said, their history preceeds them and I've no reason to trust a word that comes out of either camp. Let's not forget who they are and how they maintain their media profiles.

It would also explain why there's no need for suing.
lexi22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2013, 09:32
The Prumeister
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 16,915
[quote=Nicola32;63784632]He talks about her all the time??? He is still hanging on to her coat tails??? He uses her name to promote his own???

When was the last time he mentioned her? As far as im aware he hasn't spoken about her in a very long time.

He doesn't need to use her name to promote his own, he's doing perfectly well without her.

I think PA wishes to god he could forget she even exists.[/QUOTE]



But then he wouldn't have his children
The Prumeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2013, 10:24
sidsgirl
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,582
Funnily enough, when I read that DM article, my first thought was they just sent someone over to scour the DS Showbiz PA/KP threads and then made up a story using what they found!
^ this ^
sidsgirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2013, 10:49
cazzz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,638
A lady never tells

OI!! BIG MOMMA ? ...... hmph!!!!
pls don't shoot the messenger...it was PA's quote
cazzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2013, 14:08
Jimmy Connors
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 78,795
This thread is funny lol
Yes.

I don't get so caught up in it any more (I adhered to the very good advice Lexi gave me a few weeks back) but still like to read the comments. Sarcasm is at home in this thread, and I love a bit of sarcasm.
Jimmy Connors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-01-2013, 15:18
momma11
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,446
Yes.

I don't get so caught up in it any more (I adhered to the very good advice Lexi gave me a few weeks back) but still like to read the comments. Sarcasm is at home in this thread, and I love a bit of sarcasm.
There are some very witty posters on here , I love reading their posts !
As long as you don't take things too seriously here , it can be quite good fun , except when the subject itself is serious ( Andrew Andre's death etc ) then you see the depth of knowledge and empathy posted here , altogether , quite an interesting place to visit.

I thoroughly recommend it !
momma11 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:46.