Originally Posted by Steve Threlfall: “Lets be honest it was a fix”
lololol
Please don't say it was a conspiracy....... she was favourite going in.........ITV deliberately didn't show much of her in the edits.........nearly everyone evicted (the people who were living in the jungle with her) gave her amazing references and wanted her to win.
Anyone with any sense watching all this would realise that Charlie wasn't being shown because she was favourite.
And despite the lack of edit on the main show she still won because people voted for her. Get over it, best final, amazing girls, one had to win x
Originally Posted by Shadyfish: “lololol
Please don't say it was a conspiracy....... she was favourite going in.........ITV deliberately didn't show much of her in the edits.........nearly everyone evicted (the people who were living in the jungle with her) gave her amazing references and wanted her to win.
Anyone with any sense watching all this would realise that Charlie wasn't being shown because she was favourite.
And despite the lack of edit on the main show she still won because people voted for her. Get over it, best final, amazing girls, one had to win x”
It is a massive fix, I'm afraid.
I've just got off the phone from the National Unitary Televisual Council Association for Sympathetic Evictions and NUTCASE says it's a clear violation.
Originally Posted by Shadyfish: “nearly everyone evicted (the people who were living in the jungle with her) gave her amazing references and wanted her to win.”
No they didn't. They all said David.
And Hugo said if it was going to be one of the girls he wanted it to be Ashley, nobody mentioned her.
I wouldn't have minded so much if David had won, or Colin, or Rosemary, or Linda, or even Charlie without Kiki. But Kiki, unfortunately, became a prominent part of the show and must have been worth thousands of votes