Mormon Girl bloody drop it.
Eastenders and Charlie's acting abilities have absolutely no relevance.
Eastenders and Charlie's acting abilities have absolutely no relevance.
What is wrong with Charlie winning?
2 of 2
Originally Posted by Mormon Girl:
“Charlie is amazing in Eastenders you need to watch her she returns onscreen to Eastenders in March”
“Charlie is amazing in Eastenders you need to watch her she returns onscreen to Eastenders in March”
No offence but I really can't see soap actors/ actresses being amazing otherwise they'd be doing a lot more credible roles
Originally Posted by TheBilly:
“She hardly featured on the show until the final week. And then only because no one was left.”
“She hardly featured on the show until the final week. And then only because no one was left.”
It was princess Kiki who won it for her mum
Charlie was just a mehhh jungle celeb but then the child was brought into it and gave her the win
Nothing is wrong with Charlie winning, the public have spoken 
Not my first choice of winner, but congratulations to her, she seems like a great mum and a really sweet person. I really enjoyed the whole series, Ashley winning would have been the icing on the cake but I'm happy for Charlie
Not my first choice of winner, but congratulations to her, she seems like a great mum and a really sweet person. I really enjoyed the whole series, Ashley winning would have been the icing on the cake but I'm happy for Charlie
Originally Posted by Mormon Girl:
“What is wring with Charlie winning do any of you watch Charlie in Eastenders?”
“What is wring with Charlie winning do any of you watch Charlie in Eastenders?”
Nothing is wrong with it. I would have been quite happy with either Charlie or Ashley winning
Originally Posted by Mormon Girl:
“Charlie is amazing in Eastenders you need to watch her she returns onscreen to Eastenders in March”
“Charlie is amazing in Eastenders you need to watch her she returns onscreen to Eastenders in March”
But why does being amazing in EastEnders make her deserving of winning I'm a Celebrity? What's the connection? Following your reasoning she might as well have been crowned winner before even entering the jungle; the show itself would have been a mere formality!
I have no problem with Charlie winning, just that I was shocked that she did, ...thought Ashley had done more, and to put it simply came across as a really lovely woman.
Originally Posted by wych:
“But why does being amazing in EastEnders make her deserving of winning I'm a Celebrity? What's the connection? Following your reasoning she might as well have been crowned winner before even entering the jungle; the show itself would have been a mere formality!”
“But why does being amazing in EastEnders make her deserving of winning I'm a Celebrity? What's the connection? Following your reasoning she might as well have been crowned winner before even entering the jungle; the show itself would have been a mere formality!”
That's the problem. The context seems irrelevant to a lot, of people.
Originally Posted by TheBilly:
“She hardly featured on the show until the final week. And then only because no one was left.”
“She hardly featured on the show until the final week. And then only because no one was left.”
And why is that....... did she arrange it? Or maybe the producers/directors were doing it deliberately to give other, weaker people a chance?
Originally Posted by Mormon Girl:
“What is wring with Charlie winning do any of you watch Charlie in Eastenders?”
“What is wring with Charlie winning do any of you watch Charlie in Eastenders?”
Nothing, if she'd won it without Kiki - and was more entertaining.
Originally Posted by Mormon Girl:
“What is wring with Charlie winning do any of you watch Charlie in Eastenders?”
“What is wring with Charlie winning do any of you watch Charlie in Eastenders?”
Dont watch EE, dont watch any soaps.
there is nothing wrong with her winning.
Originally Posted by Unigal07:
“Nothing is wrong with Charlie winning, the public have spoken
Not my first choice of winner, but congratulations to her, she seems like a great mum and a really sweet person. I really enjoyed the whole series, Ashley winning would have been the icing on the cake but I'm happy for Charlie”
“Nothing is wrong with Charlie winning, the public have spoken
Not my first choice of winner, but congratulations to her, she seems like a great mum and a really sweet person. I really enjoyed the whole series, Ashley winning would have been the icing on the cake but I'm happy for Charlie
”
For the first time ever I wanted a joint winner. Thought that Ashley and Charlie were amazing supporting each other in that final trial. But it went on votes, the public have spoken and both girls will do well out of it as they should. x
There was nothing wrong with her winning, I wanted it to be an Ashley v David final with Ashley winning but failing either of them, Hugo or Charlie.
I am disapointed that Ashley didnt win; she is a cool girl, but Charlie seemed nice enough so the result was fair enough.
Its not like Helen won, that would have been tragic to see.
ETA: the only thing that bugged me was Kiki at the end of the show tonight seemed manipulative. It hadn't bothered me in the slightest before but that was really blatant. Not that I think it affected the result as the lines closed less than a minute later.
But that was ITV being sickly not Charlie.
I am disapointed that Ashley didnt win; she is a cool girl, but Charlie seemed nice enough so the result was fair enough.
Its not like Helen won, that would have been tragic to see.
ETA: the only thing that bugged me was Kiki at the end of the show tonight seemed manipulative. It hadn't bothered me in the slightest before but that was really blatant. Not that I think it affected the result as the lines closed less than a minute later.
But that was ITV being sickly not Charlie.
2 of 2
