Originally Posted by benjiman_LFC:
“Charlie did.nothing until they wheeled Kiki out.
Producers obviously got worried that they might have an American winner.”
Originally Posted by LaineyK:
“No. I don't think people should win because they are English.”
Originally Posted by sheila blige:
“I have. Charlie Brooks is without doubt the best actress in Eastenders (and I love her character of Janine). But - what the hell has her being in Eastenders got to do with her 'performance' on this year's IAC? She was totally anonymous, a little bit bitchy (not only about Helen - although Helen deserved it more than most), and she really made a meal of 'missing out' on seeing her daughter (bearing in mind that she chose to be away from her for three weeks).
Make no mistake - Charlie owes winning this year's IAC to Kiki, Eastenders fans and the fact that the kind of people who vote in this thing are extremely jingoistic (most will be Sun readers) and won't have a 'johnny foreigner' win - EVER.”
Originally Posted by
heiker:
“True but the voting was heavily influenced by the introduction of:
”
Originally Posted by Chris_Champion:
“Wanted Ashley to win and surprised that both this forum and an online voting page that i suscribe too both had Ashley as the winner by some distance??
Not surprised though, the eastenders fanbase has done this before and kept saying to the missus that Charlie would win because of that and the bring out the little daughter trick.
Voting has always been to a point based on the edit of the show each night but then again Ashley did get good coverage?
Oh well, another winner who was not especially exiting to watch but the producers got their winner IMO”
I keep making the following points - and I'm going to keep doing it until someone answers me.
1. I'm not British.
2. I don't watch Eastenders so was judging Charlie purely on her time in the jungle.
3. She was my firm and clear second favourite (after Hugo) from a long time before I knew she had a daughter, or what that daughter's name was. Every bit of Kiki manipulation came from the producers - not Charlie. She reacted much more calmly than I would have at losing a meeting with her child.
So how do you lot ^^^^^^^^^ explain that, then? Am I the only one, do you think? Stop just posting the same thing over and over again and READ what's being said back to you.
Originally Posted by
Eve_Dyer:
“The competition is over now so no need for hostitlity.
I was a firm Ashley fan and I could give the reasons why but the fact is that Charlie won it - now if several of the others had won (like Helen or Limahl), there'd be reason to complain.
There seemed to be a genuine chemistry (friendship one) between Ashley and Charlie and it made for one of the loveliest final shows I've seen.
Both women did extremely well and both deserved their place in the final (but I still with Ashley had won
)”
Well said, Eve. Lovely post.

I'd have been very happy if Ashley won.
edited to add: To those complaining about the British/Eastenders/Kiki issues; two questions: 1) do you think Ashley got more camera time than anyone else? and 2) Do you think being chosen to be a meddler gave all three participants an unfair advantage?