Originally Posted by kleinzach:
“Sorry but that argument has no logic at all. When someone shoots at an animal at a hunt, is the target the animal or the others in the hunt? Clue - it's not the latter.”
That has to be the most random and dissimilar choice of analogy I've ever read, and considering where we're posting, that's some feat. Laughing at a joke made about someone, isn't the same as laughing at them. The laugh comes from the fact that he's said it.
Quote:
“Boyle's brand of 'humour' relies on baiting and bullying. This means he needs someone to target that baiting on and someone to target the results of that baiting at”
No it doesn't, the laugh comes before the reaction.
Quote:
“To say that Jordan and her son (as much as I dislike Jordan) weren't the target is to completely miss the point. They were the target, and he targetted them to get a reaction from Jordan which he duly got. This is how he gets 1.1m followers. Not because 1.1m people like what he does, but because people like to see a car crash happen, especially if there is no-one involved with them is in the crash.”
It's not how he gets thousands to see hm weekly though, his joke are. The reaction's from his jokes there don't come till months after when some easily offended third party books tickets to a show they know will do just that.