Originally Posted by StigOfTheKrump:
“I'm interested about the 'many, many other flaws'.”
Timing and syncing with Robin were off throughout, particularly in the cringeworthy final sequence (seriously, the jumping onto the sofa - WTF?!). She wasn't keeping up with him at all and her kicks just looked sloppy as she wasn't lifting her feet as high as she should. There were moments where she forgot what she was meant to do. She lost timing. People better versed in dance then me on these boards also say that the spins were clumsy, she wasn't closing her feet and there weren't any heel leads. Posture wasn't good. I'm not saying it was as bad as anything Widdecombe would produce, but it was still a
very poor routine (particularly considering the point of the competition it was performed in), certainly not worthy of the marks it received, and I think all the problems it had would count as "many, many".
And wherever possible she just goes for "fun, fun, fun". Winners have always had diversity in their showmanship - they can perform a dance whether it requires fun, sexiness, elegance or drama (compare Tom's quickstep, tango and foxtrot, or Kara's paso, charleston and rumba - all dances with a very different performance). I honestly don't think that whenever she has a dance that doesn't allow for the fun angle at all (e.g. the rumba last week) she can sell it particularly well. She has one style of performance she does well, fair enough, and I'll admit my comments were probably a bit too harsh - but she doesn't have diversity.