Originally Posted by hendero:
“I would have thought it's against CIA protocol to intentionally kill the former head of the agency, even if doing so would have also resulted in the death of a high profile terrorist.”
Well, possibly... but I think it probably depends on the context.
Ex-CIA chief with terrorist droned to death in Central Park... A. Bad. Thing. And likely illegal. Ex-CIA chief kidnapped and transported to the wilds of Pakistan and held as a prisoner of major terrorist with no obvious chance of extraction? Drone strike only frowned upon if it makes it into the public domain - I'm guessing. Not so much illegal as a pragmatic solution. Let's move on, nothing to see here...
Originally Posted by hendero:
“The US government (it is implied the order came from the very top) chose to release five more terrorists it held prisoner in exchange for Saul, so clearly he is considered extremely valuable even if he now only is the ex-Director.”
The value of someone like that to the terrorists cannot be over-estimated - both for the part he played as a shield but also highly valuable as a propaganda icon if they had decided to string him up by the neck via a crane, all live-streamed to YouTube...
that would be why the White House ordered the exchange - the alternatives were too damaging. Least worst option and all that even if they did have to go through with an exchange of high-value prisoners...
Whereas an ex-CIA chief has no value if he's vapourised - conundrum solved, no barter power, no YouTube movies... a pat on the back for Carrie for taking such a difficult decision in the circumstances.
---------------------
I never liked Dar Adal! He surely
must be the mole. We can't be being led down
another dead end? I will confess to a sharp intake of breath when I realised who we were looking at.