DS Forums

 
 

Microsoft Set To Dump Surface?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-02-2013, 10:49
John259
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Posts: 14,285
A lot of people are waiting to see what the Surface Pro is like before making a decision.
That's fair enough IMHO, it's a very different product to the Surface RT.
John259 is online now   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 03-02-2013, 08:54
IvanIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
I think MS needs to unlock RT platform and publish a native ARM compiler for Windows. Surface RT is a great tablet IMO, but it does not bring USP that would really make people pay attention. Also calling it Windows causes expectations that are not true and people are disappointed. But having a full Windows ARM that is energy consumption aware and can function as a tablet, too, that could be quite interesting, IMO. I know that's what MS intends with Surface pro, but I don't think ARM would hurt it. It would take time before the ARM versions of programmes would be available (recompiling, testing, etc) and I think they could co-exist. Intel might not like it though

What brought this, just today I connected an external HDD and bluray rewriter to my Surface RT and it recognised them, could use them in data mode, I just did not find any apps that could play CDs and DVDs.I guess there's not enough power to try to play bluray discs. And it's a pity that this is not possible only because somebody said so and not because it's a technical impossibility.
IvanIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 11:47
TheBigM
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 12,983
I think MS needs to unlock RT platform and publish a native ARM compiler for Windows. Surface RT is a great tablet IMO, but it does not bring USP that would really make people pay attention. Also calling it Windows causes expectations that are not true and people are disappointed. But having a full Windows ARM that is energy consumption aware and can function as a tablet, too, that could be quite interesting, IMO. I know that's what MS intends with Surface pro, but I don't think ARM would hurt it. It would take time before the ARM versions of programmes would be available (recompiling, testing, etc) and I think they could co-exist. Intel might not like it though

What brought this, just today I connected an external HDD and bluray rewriter to my Surface RT and it recognised them, could use them in data mode, I just did not find any apps that could play CDs and DVDs.I guess there's not enough power to try to play bluray discs. And it's a pity that this is not possible only because somebody said so and not because it's a technical impossibility.
Your argument is summarised along the lines of we have the desktop in RT, we have Office, let's open it up to the likes of Adobe too. But...most people believe the desktop is going away in RT as soon as Office can make good WinRT apps.

The other thing is that while WinRT was designed for secure apps (sandboxing, using contracts and brokers etc), designed for automatic resource management (e.g. tombstoning, recovering RAM etc) and mobility. Win32-based apps ported to RT will not have any of those benefits. What you end up with is a full PC running on underpowered ARM hardware with the loss in battery life that is important in a tablet.

There is a far easier away for you to get what you want Ivan which is a device that's like the Surface RT hardware and price wise but like the Surface Pro in terms of software flexibility. It's making a Surface with an Intel SOC like Clover Trail. I think there is a good likelihood of seeing a Surface with a Bay Trail processor at the end of this year.
TheBigM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 12:24
IvanIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
It's just they went and ported Windows to ARM and then disabled half of it. Yes, it does not make sense to have any power hungry application on a tablet, but I really would not mind something like Total Commander for ARM. I grew up on Norton Commander and having a file manager with a source and destination windows is essential for me. Or an ability to play CDs or DVDs. Give me an app, I do not mind. It just seems a waste to be able to work with external drives, but not completely.
IvanIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2013, 19:59
IvanIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
FYI Microsoft removed a white list for sites allowed to use flash. You can now blacklist a particular site if you do not wish flash to run there.
IvanIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2013, 20:07
John259
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Posts: 14,285
FYI Microsoft removed a white list for sites allowed to use flash. You can now blacklist a particular site if you do not wish flash to run there.
Microsoft will administer the blacklist:
http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/...s-flash-145367
John259 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13-03-2013, 10:37
IvanIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
There was a way with the whitelist, there probably will be a way to change the blacklist as well Doesn't matter, I guess I hardly get to a blacklisted site, what with my browsing habits of ~20 websites

Anyway, I got across this article with some nice photos A look at Microsoft's top-secret Surface prototypes

It fascinates me in general to see how an idea started and evolved into a reality, one does not get to see it often.
IvanIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2013, 11:30
cnbcwatcher
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At college, in L.A.'s office
Posts: 54,216
That's fair enough IMHO, it's a very different product to the Surface RT.
The Surface Pro is essentially a full laptop but tablet sized. Even a self confessed Machead like me thinks the Surface Pro is cool My dad said he'd buy himself one if he wins the lotto.
cnbcwatcher is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2013, 12:01
IvanIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
The pro seems to be doing well, they always sell out the next batch in a couple of days over at US MS shop. I wonder when they will be available outside US. I think the RT is a great tablet, but not for the price they are selling it. They need to price them in the same area as Samsung tablets and they will see more interest.
IvanIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2013, 21:06
cnbcwatcher
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At college, in L.A.'s office
Posts: 54,216
Looks like the Surface Pro isn't going anywhere: http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tech/new...ch-400000.html

Of particular interest is this:

Microsoft's 128GB Surface Pro has been hit by stock shortages since its launch, with the firm only able to meet the demand in recent weeks.

The Surface Pro tablet is expected to be released in Europe in the coming months.
cnbcwatcher is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2013, 21:58
IvanIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
I think they might have misjudged an interest for the pro based on the RT, having it completely the other way around.
IvanIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2013, 22:21
late8
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,052
The whole windows 8 platform is just not working.

It's not a nice OS and the tablets are just not well placed.


From day one MS should have done a brand new PC/touch OS and used a advanced form of Windows phone for a tablet that integrates .
Not a full bloat of Windows, re hashed.
late8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-03-2013, 08:10
Air Resistance
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northallerton, North Yorkshire
Posts: 5,008
The whole windows 8 platform is just not working.

It's not a nice OS and the tablets are just not well placed.


From day one MS should have done a brand new PC/touch OS and used a advanced form of Windows phone for a tablet that integrates .
Not a full bloat of Windows, re hashed.
I'm not sure if you've contradicted yourself there, cause Microsoft have indeed built the whole windows 8 os touch screen and integration?

Anyway, the reason Imo why its hasn't taken off yet is the lack of availability. I'm just hoping there not too late to the party.
Air Resistance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-03-2013, 11:43
justatech
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 918
I would like to see them take Windows 3.1 as the basis for a tablet and add a new modern interface and bolt on the essential factors such as dvd etc that people use now. This would give a complete Windows operating system which would work without needing to have the bloat factors removed.
justatech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-03-2013, 12:19
emptybox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Scottish Borders
Posts: 11,989
I would like to see them take Windows 3.1 as the basis for a tablet and add a new modern interface and bolt on the essential factors such as dvd etc that people use now. This would give a complete Windows operating system which would work without needing to have the bloat factors removed.
You sound like you've been asleep for twenty years, and only just woke up?

(DVD?....On a tablet? )
emptybox is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16-03-2013, 14:43
nathanbrazil
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: AccountKiller
Posts: 8,749
Microsoft missed the boat really. If you don't want Apple, you get Android. Both tried and tested platforms.
It is getting harder to understand the sheer pig-headed stupidity of Microsoft. I've been using Windows since 3.1, and have finally given up with Windows 8. I detest the look, and the way they've tried to force this down people's throats, claiming it's such a cool, wonderful thing, the way of the future. When the truth is it looks horrible, and is a pain to use for those used to - and preferring - another way.

Most unforgivable, is that MS has had years to observe what Apple and Android are doing right, and to hoover up all the small independent apps for Windows that other do so much better. They could and should have produced something incredibly slick, absolutely beautiful and with hundreds of killer apps available from day one.

I never thought I'd see the day, but my next PC is very likely to be an iMac.
nathanbrazil is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 16-03-2013, 14:59
John259
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Posts: 14,285
It is getting harder to understand the sheer pig-headed stupidity of Microsoft.
I have a theory about that: greed. By removing the Start button, Microsoft hoped that users would instead use the Metro home screen to select programs. That would have increased the chances of Metro apps being run, rather than Windows EXE programs. Microsoft get a small rake-off from selling Metro apps, but I suspect their real motive was to sell the advertising space that some Metro apps contain.
John259 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16-03-2013, 17:26
IvanIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
I rather think they wanted it to be a gateway to Windows RT devices, having the same user experience everywhere. But, while RT touch devices are nice to use, probably not more or less than Apple or Android devices, using Metro with mouse feels clumsy. Also OEMs decided that RT devices will be on the high end price range which isn't helping.
IvanIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-03-2013, 18:09
dezire
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,831
The whole windows 8 platform is just not working.

It's not a nice OS and the tablets are just not well placed.


From day one MS should have done a brand new PC/touch OS and used a advanced form of Windows phone for a tablet that integrates .
Not a full bloat of Windows, re hashed.
99 percent of users might agree with this statement I would imagine.
It's a poorly thought out operating system that will be forgotten along with the likes of Vista.
dezire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-03-2013, 22:14
justatech
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 918
You sound like you've been asleep for twenty years, and only just woke up?

(DVD?....On a tablet? )
No dear. I just wanted a clean interface with no bells and whistles that actually works. Windows 3.1 does those things and doesn't hog memory.

The facility to link to a dvd would enable games to be installed to the tablet so you wern't stuck with app type games and you could play real games.

In effect I want the tablet to be a real substitute for a desktop or laptop and not just a toy.
justatech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-03-2013, 23:42
BrokenArrow
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 20,806
I rather think they wanted it to be a gateway to Windows RT devices, having the same user experience everywhere. But, while RT touch devices are nice to use, probably not more or less than Apple or Android devices, using Metro with mouse feels clumsy. Also OEMs decided that RT devices will be on the high end price range which isn't helping.
The RT suffers the same problems that Android and Ipad have, the ARM processor is just too underpowered to do anything useful with.

Even the web browsers are slow and clunky on tablets compared to a full intel processor powered devices and that's an app that's hardly pushing the boundaries.

The Surface PRO though is a cool device that can run the millions of Windows Apps at full power, and it has stylus (which is big plus for people like me who hate touchscreens).
BrokenArrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2013, 00:38
emptybox
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Scottish Borders
Posts: 11,989
No dear. I just wanted a clean interface with no bells and whistles that actually works. Windows 3.1 does those things and doesn't hog memory.

The facility to link to a dvd would enable games to be installed to the tablet so you wern't stuck with app type games and you could play real games.

In effect I want the tablet to be a real substitute for a desktop or laptop and not just a toy.
Windows 3.1 did those things to the standards of twenty years ago.
But it is not up to the standards of today.
emptybox is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2013, 07:15
John259
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Posts: 14,285
The facility to link to a dvd would enable games to be installed to the tablet so you wern't stuck with app type games and you could play real games.
The most important factors that control which programs can be run are the processor, the video processor and the operating system. That's why the vast majority of tablets can't run Windows EXE programs. Where the program is physically obtained from doesn't matter.
John259 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2013, 09:02
IvanIV
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
Surface pro will do that. RT devices use an ARM processor making it impossible to run programmes compiled for x86 processors. Without emulator, but there is none. Windows on RT is actually at a similar level as Windows 8 (non pro), but MS made it impossible/difficult to run native ARM programmes on it. So we have native programmes that are a part of Windows and Office. ARM is not meant to do all that x86 has to, but I really would not mind to get some of the programmes for ARM natively. I find Windows RT APIs too restrictive. But that's what they get when they call it Windows.
IvanIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2013, 17:32
cnbcwatcher
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: At college, in L.A.'s office
Posts: 54,216
The whole windows 8 platform is just not working.

It's not a nice OS and the tablets are just not well placed.


From day one MS should have done a brand new PC/touch OS and used a advanced form of Windows phone for a tablet that integrates .
Not a full bloat of Windows, re hashed.
I think what MS should have done was make two versions of Windows 8. The mobile/tablet version would have had the new Metro (or Duplo as I prefer to call it) interface and the desktop PC version would have been an updated Windows 7 and would have had a Windows 7 interface but without Aero. You then would have had Windows 8 Desktop, Windows 8 Tablet and Windows Phone 8.
cnbcwatcher is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:26.