|
||||||||
No live sport for Now TV? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#101 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,981
|
Quote:
What's the current closest comparable option from BT's YouView offering before linear channels and sports content is added?
Taking the 'Unlimited' option being the closest to linear content they have that doesn't require a 'per show' charge, I make it £15.45 line rental £26.00 broadband & calls/talk weekends £12.50 TV unlimited package A grand total of £53.95 per month and that's with no additional option of linear channels or Sky Sports which will add further cost to the monthly bill. So by my reckoning, BT really doesn't offer a competitive deal in regard to the other providers because unless my calculations are wrong, they will be charging in the same region but for less overall content - making it poor value for money. £15.45 line rental £26.00 broadband & calls/talk weekends £5.00 TV base package £20.00 Sky Sports 1 & 2 The inclusion of ESPN in the £12.50 unlimited package does make the offer far more tempting. It will be interesting to see how BT does package its offering. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#102 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 2,935
|
Quote:
At the moment SkySports are £20 for 1 & 2. So the cheapest package assuming these were available through YouView would be £66.45 ie
£15.45 line rental £26.00 broadband & calls/talk weekends £5.00 TV base package £20.00 Sky Sports 1 & 2 The inclusion of ESPN in the £12.50 unlimited package does make the offer far more tempting. It will be interesting to see how BT does package its offering. |
|
|
|
|
|
#103 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,107
|
YouViews target market is the following - the ten million UK users who already have -
1, Digital Freeview television, and - 2, Broadband. But the important bit here is number 2. As thats broadband from anyone, not just BT or TalkTalk. |
|
|
|
|
|
#104 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 2,935
|
Quote:
YouViews target market is the following - the ten million UK users who already have -
1, Digital Freeview television, and - 2, Broadband. But the important bit here is number 2. As thats broadband from anyone, not just BT or TalkTalk. If a non pay household wanted to get a subsidised box by entering into a phone/BB contract, they would be more likely to look at TalkTalk on price alone because that's the key area in the success of this. How many non pay households will be swayed over is another thing completely because they are non pay for a reason. |
|
|
|
|
|
#105 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Winter Hill
Posts: 248
|
Quote:
Anyway - Back to topic.##
YouView will make available only the channels the user wants to view. So if you only want Sky Sports 1, or 1 & 2, you will only have to subscribe to Sky Sports 1 & 2. And nothing more. No twenty quid base pack, no twelve month lock-in contract, and no shopping channels either. And they said that. Not me (but not the shopping channels bit). Yes if you go with the BT or TalkTalk packages you can have live Sky Sports via Youview. But if you just have a Youview Box on its own, you will not be able to get live Sky Sports via NOW TV which looks to be the only way to just get Sky Sports. NOW TV is the only option available to me as I don't have the broadband speed BT and TalkTalk demand for their IPTV Packages, (yet I'm happily watching good quality SD Live Sky Movies currently via NOWTV and a ethernet wired Roku !!!) Considering the money spent on developing Youview, it seems crazy that they are excluding a significant part of the broadband customer base from getting live IPTV using a Youview box. |
|
|
|
|
|
#106 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,981
|
Quote:
Yes if you go with the BT or TalkTalk packages you can have live Sky Sports via Youview. But if you just have a Youview Box on its own, you will not be able to get live Sky Sports via NOW TV which looks to be the only way to just get Sky Sports.
I do agree with you on all your other points though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#107 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Darn Sarf
Posts: 28,743
|
Quote:
At the moment SkySports are £20 for 1 & 2. So the cheapest package assuming these were available through YouView would be £66.45 ie
£15.45 line rental £26.00 broadband & calls/talk weekends £5.00 TV base package £20.00 Sky Sports 1 & 2 The inclusion of ESPN in the £12.50 unlimited package does make the offer far more tempting. It will be interesting to see how BT does package its offering. Yes you can perhaps get an annual line rental deal from Sky and VM too, I don't know as they don't push it like BT, but even without that saving BT as listed comes out notionally a lot cheaper for the cheapest package However, we are all guessing as we may get some unexpected packages on offer from all of them, and football will overall likely cost more than at present for the same amount of content, from all of them. In 6 to 8 months or so, we shall see. Choices!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 2,935
|
Quote:
However, BT also heavily promote their annual line rental (£10.75/month equivalent) and people looking for Premier League football cheaply mostly won't opt for Unlimited fibre, so that's £18 a month for Infinity 1. That potentially cuts it down by £12- odd a month. and makes the cheapest method much less at BT than the others.
Yes you can perhaps get an annual line rental deal from Sky and VM too, I don't know as they don't push it like BT, but even without that saving BT as listed comes out notionally a lot cheaper for the cheapest package However, we are all guessing as we may get some unexpected packages on offer from all of them, and football will overall likely cost more than at present for the same amount of content, from all of them. In 6 to 8 months or so, we shall see. Choices! ![]() But like you say, we are all just guessing at the moment but it's good fun isn't it Let's hope that one of them break cover in such a way that the others have their hand forced... Maybe then we'll see some real competition to get our hard earned! We can only hope... |
|
|
|
|
|
#109 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,981
|
I had always thought that VM was quite expensive for Sky Sports until I did the calculations. Interestingly, if you focus on fibre it's the most competitive.
So if there is a move to people comparing fibre broadband prices then it should benefit and I can understand why it's less worried about BT's fibre roll-out than I thought it should be. |
|
|
|
|
|
#110 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 2,935
|
Quote:
I had always thought that VM was quite expensive for Sky Sports until I did the calculations. Interestingly, if you focus on fibre it's the most competitive.
So if there is a move to people comparing fibre broadband prices then it should benefit and I can understand why it's less worried about BT's fibre roll-out than I thought it should be. From a fibre point of view, we can see from your comparisons that Virgin provide the cheapest price out of the 3 providers mentioned but then without fibre they become the most expensive which I find quite interesting. I'd like to hear your opinion on who you think offers the best overall service for the price? |
|
|
|
|
|
#111 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,107
|
Quote:
If customers download or stream a lot of content from Now TV, Lovefilm, Netflix etc and other things that could be added further down the line - possibly in HD too - a capped option will soon see them incurring extra charges each month.
But like you say, we are all just guessing at the moment but it's good fun isn't it Let's hope that one of them break cover in such a way that the others have their hand forced... Maybe then we'll see some real competition to get our hard earned! We can only hope... |
|
|
|
|
|
#112 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 2,935
|
Quote:
Actually, if one has either a BT or TT supplied box, the streamed services from YouView don't count against ones internet usage. But I have no idea about retail boxes used with the above ISP's.
EDIT - The bit on the BT site says "There's no need to worry about your BT Broadband usage allowance. With BT Vision Player Unlimited, all BT Vision and YouView On Demand and catch-up TV is exempt from your usage." What is YouView on demand deemed to mean? iPlayer etc? Or all 3rd party apps? |
|
|
|
|
|
#113 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,981
|
Quote:
Interesting post. Overall, when you take in all the available add-ons (along the lines of customer bonus features like Sky Go etc), what provider offers the best all-round deal in your opinion? Who offers the best selection of channels for the money? How many channels do you get in Virgin's basic pack compared to Sky's for the money involved etc.
From a fibre point of view, we can see from your comparisons that Virgin provide the cheapest price out of the 3 providers mentioned but then without fibre they become the most expensive which I find quite interesting. I'd like to hear your opinion on who you think offers the best overall service for the price? I would sum up the services as: TalkTalk - cheap access to pay-entertainment channels. Virgin - best broadband offering, second best TV offering, only covers half the country. BT - cheapest access to the two key sports channels. Sky - best TV, market innovator, best customer service. To answer another question, if I had to go with one provider for life and never change it would be Sky. Here's a brief Guardian article comparing Sky and YouView, Sky gets 8/10 and YouView 7/10. Since the article, Sky has got iPlayer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 2,935
|
Quote:
Tough call and I would need to do further analysis.
I would sum up the services as: TalkTalk - cheap access to pay-entertainment channels. Virgin - best broadband offering, second best TV offering, only covers half the country. BT - cheapest access to the two key sports channels. Sky - best TV, market innovator, best customer service. To answer another question, if I had to go with one provider for life and never change it would be Sky. The service I was with for the longest was Sky and they provided me with everything I required. I've also tried Virgin (and Telewest before that!) and although the general service was good, if anything did go wrong occasionally, it was the customer service aspect that got me down. TalkTalk and BT have never had my custom but if BT can come up with the goods regarding live sport next year then I'm very much open to the idea... |
|
|
|
|
|
#115 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 2,935
|
Quote:
Here's a brief Guardian article comparing Sky and YouView, Sky gets 8/10 and YouView 7/10. Since the article, Sky has got iPlayer.
Do you have a YouView box yourself? |
|
|
|
|
|
#116 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,981
|
Quote:
I'd have thought a direct comparison would see YouView score lower than 7/10 considering it still has user features to be added. Considering where it's currently at, that's not a bad score at all.
Do you have a YouView box yourself? I agree with the review that the EPG is poor compared to Sky as it is basically Freeview's unstructured EPG but you can delete unwanted channels. Next year will be interesting for YouView, I think the IPTV channels via Connect TV will be an interesting development as the cost for a broadcaster to use these will be relatively low. |
|
|
|
|
|
#117 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,107
|
Quote:
Really? I thought that was just for content provided by BT and any 3rd party apps (Now TV etc) weren't included. That's not a bad shout if everything is included in your allowance.
EDIT - The bit on the BT site says "There's no need to worry about your BT Broadband usage allowance. With BT Vision Player Unlimited, all BT Vision and YouView On Demand and catch-up TV is exempt from your usage." What is YouView on demand deemed to mean? iPlayer etc? Or all 3rd party apps? ------------------------------------- Re: BROADBAND USAGE WITH YOUVIEW?? on 30-10-2012 9h50 Hi Sjf9712, If you have to YouView through BT then no need to worry about your BT Broadband usage allowance - all BT Vision and YouView On Demand and Catch Up TV is exempt from your usage. Thanks Paddy BTCare Community Mod -------------------------------- And then the thread just dissolved into chaos, with many users just not believing him. As theres a problem with the BT online useage checker ATM, and there has been for a while. But it is true. http://community.bt.com/t5/YouView-f...EW/td-p/673516 |
|
|
|
|
|
#118 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 2,935
|
Quote:
This topic has caused much controversy on the BT forums too. Until a Mod intervened -
------------------------------------- Re: BROADBAND USAGE WITH YOUVIEW?? on 30-10-2012 9h50 Hi Sjf9712, If you have to YouView through BT then no need to worry about your BT Broadband usage allowance - all BT Vision and YouView On Demand and Catch Up TV is exempt from your usage. Thanks Paddy BTCare Community Mod -------------------------------- And then the thread just dissolved into chaos, with many users just not believing him. As theres a problem with the BT online useage checker ATM, and there has been for a while. But it is true. http://community.bt.com/t5/YouView-f...EW/td-p/673516 |
|
|
|
|
|
#119 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,915
|
Quote:
I was under the impression that the whole point of this thread back at the start is that the above is actually not possible nor will be possible anytime soon.
Yes if you go with the BT or TalkTalk packages you can have live Sky Sports via Youview. But if you just have a Youview Box on its own, you will not be able to get live Sky Sports via NOW TV which looks to be the only way to just get Sky Sports. NOW TV is the only option available to me as I don't have the broadband speed BT and TalkTalk demand for their IPTV Packages, (yet I'm happily watching good quality SD Live Sky Movies currently via NOWTV and a ethernet wired Roku !!!) Considering the money spent on developing Youview, it seems crazy that they are excluding a significant part of the broadband customer base from getting live IPTV using a Youview box. Previously on o2 i got 4.4, TT were saying 5.1, from conversations with both o2 and TT, i was led to believe that it wasn't impossible to achieve TT's estimated speed and from TT sales, the tv channels would work below 5meg anyway! Second day with TT and i woke up to no internet, had to get CEO office involved as Customer Service was useless (they wanted to send a bright sparks engineer out an week and half later), and i got released from my contract and back to o2 for broadband. Problem with You View is that is partners BT and Talk Talk both use some sort of line management, IP Profile for BT and DLM for TT, which for a customer like me on a "long line", isn't much use when they want to start playing God with the service, i kept getting "errors per second" as the excuse for the slow speeds, where on o2, their was no problems with disconnections, the line was stable syncing at around 4-4.4. The thing that annoys me the most is, Talk Talk live Internet TV services all state a minimum of 5meg to work, yet on the Xbox and a sync of 4 on o2, i can watch Sky Movies live channels on Now TV without any problems and a decent enough picture on a sync of 4 and a download speed of 3.8, with the likes of Netflix, Now TV and Love Film all playing back in HD without any issues. I had been thinking of buying a You View box, but after reading the stories that it won't carry live sport to non subscribers to BT or TT, buying a second Xbox to watch stuff in the bedroom is looking right now to be a better bet. I love the idea of You View and the potential of what the apps and service the box may carry in the future, but it is starting to look like politics may get in the way, thanks to the likes of BT and Talk Talk that want users to sign up to them, rather than use their own/current ISP and access services and pay companies direct like how apps on the likes of the Xbox work. We live in a one bedroom flat, my partner has no interest in the PC or the internet, the only time she is online is on her mobile, and i know how to manage my bandwith when it comes to wanting to stream Netflix etc, and until we become a nation where most can access Fibre, then when the likes of BT and TT start offering these tv services, they need to get more realistic with their minimum speeds required, as currently i feel they are set far too high, and probably more based on a household where 3 or 4 people are online at the same time, and these less than realistic speeds for tv to work, is based on the streaming still works when "mum, son & daughter" is online when "dad" is watching Sky Sports, rather than 2 people watching a movie and the one PC in the house is switched off. |
|
|
|
|
|
#120 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,107
|
Hi, steven cardwell,
Sorry to read about the problems your had, but if I may, I'd like to explain why it is the way it is... The current online services, such as Netflix, Lovefilm, Now TV ect, all use a broadband transmission method which is known as Unicasting and this only requires a user has a line speed of 3.5Mbps to view. However, both BT and TT are/will be using a method known as Multicasting, which is a far more efficient use of their broadband network. The only downside for you was it does indeed require 5Mbps to access, and this is purely down to technical reasons of Multicasting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#121 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,257
|
Quote:
Hi, steven cardwell,
Sorry to read about the problems your had, but if I may, I'd like to explain why it is the way it is... The current online services, such as Netflix, Lovefilm, Now TV ect, all use a broadband transmission method which is known as Unicasting and this only requires a user has a line speed of 3.5Mbps to view. However, both BT and TT are/will be using a method known as Multicasting, which is a far more efficient use of their broadband network. The only downside for you was it does indeed require 5Mbps to access, and this is purely down to technical reasons of Multicasting. As far as the client STB is concerned, its just receiving a stream, regardless of what network protocol is used. |
|
|
|
|
|
#122 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,107
|
Quote:
I'm curious why more bandwidth is required for Multicast, I doubt (I'd hope) that the additional 1.5Mb is required just because of that.
As far as the client STB is concerned, its just receiving a stream, regardless of what network protocol is used. I have no idea why the extra 1.5 Mb is required, though I too would love to know why (from a curiosity point of view). I once read a TalkTalk tech sheet on the matter, where they stated 3.5Mb should have been enough, but technically, it turned out not to be that simple. And there will be further Multicast services coming to YouView, such as HD content, that can be streamed at even higher bitrates, for those that can recieve such. Which is where adaptive bitrate streaming will come into play. |
|
|
|
|
|
#123 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,921
|
I got my TT YouView box a couple of weeks ago and it is great . I am an existing customer who only has TT as an option in the exchange for llu service. I was getting 6 to 7 Mbps with BT but get 17 with TT. That will do until we get fibre at some point.
As for YV, well I used to be a Sky subscriber, I even had all the sport and film channels at one point. But I only really watched the free stuff and paying Sky made feel unclean.I went for a freesat + box with a free view telly and that has served me well. But you can't argue with a free box so my Foxsat will be up for sale now and I will watch YouView grow into an interesting platform, it's not bad now for a starter though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#124 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,107
|
Quote:
I got my TT YouView box a couple of weeks ago and it is great . I am an existing customer who only has TT as an option in the exchange for llu service. I was getting 6 to 7 Mbps with BT but get 17 with TT. That will do until we get fibre at some point.
As for YV, well I used to be a Sky subscriber, I even had all the sport and film channels at one point. But I only really watched the free stuff and paying Sky made feel unclean.I went for a freesat + box with a free view telly and that has served me well. But you can't argue with a free box so my Foxsat will be up for sale now and I will watch YouView grow into an interesting platform, it's not bad now for a starter though. As the title of this thread states 'No live sport on Now TV?', so? So what? YouView isn't about Sky. YouView is about YouView. And where it's success or failure is concerned, Sky is an just an irrelevance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#125 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: London
Posts: 29
|
You talk about how Sky/NOW TV is irrelevant to YouView. Setting aside your anti Sky opinions - without NOW TV's Sky Movies content I wonder how credible the YouView On Demand films area would look with a handful of films each week and some categories empty. Far from being irrelevant Sky is currently making the YouView proposition more attractive. Also Sky are growing with YouView's increased popularity.
Regarding the original topic, Sky Sports from NOW TV on YouView. Funnily enough VisionMan1 you touched on the answer, all be it accidentally, as you rightly said BT and TalkTalk are using Multicast as an IPTV routing scheme and NOW TV are using Unicast. Given that BT is a YouView Stakeholder YouView are currently focusing on developing Multicast only. Once that work is completed then YouView can dedicate some resources to Unicast and hopefully then we should see live linear channels, movies and sports via NOW TV. Btw. Adaptive Bitrate, isn't Multicast only. NOW TV and Amazon's LoveFilm and Netflix when they eventually make it on to YouView will have access to ABR. Once YV's finished developing that. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:55.



