Originally Posted by Coma_White:
“Many times recently I have read comments from SCD viewers calling for Louis to win as he is, in some minds, the only non-performance and non-dance trained contestant left.
Personally, I am baffled that anyone could make such a naïve statement. As a professional gymnast he is trained to a world class standard in a physical performance that is inextricably related to dancing.
He has perfected the minute details which give the dance performance finesse - turnout, placement, lines.
He may not be specifically trained to dance latin and ballroom, but he does already have an enormous advantage in terms of understanding performance technique - much moreso than any other contestant who has previously learnt choreographed routines in a pop band, for example. Whilst he may have been lacking in the 'personality' aspect so far (which as usual results in the tiresome 'acting coach' episode), he has been no further behind any contestants that also have no previous acting experience.
I have no problem with the guy whatsoever, but anyone that seriously thinks that he is the inexperienced underdog is woefully mistaken - surely someone else realises this too?!”
I've been saying that since week 1, though mostly to people who claim Denise is the only contestant with experience ever...
Too many people think that only direct dancing experience is relevant, when in reality if you only think outside the box the tiniest bit all sorts of experience is relevant and useful for Strictly.
Sportspeople have the stamina for training, TV presenters are used to camerawork, actors (should) know how to perform, models have poise etc.
Anyone who claims Strictly is or ever has been a level playing field is mistaken in my view - just because experience isn't directly related to dancing doesn't mean it isn't relevant. Experience shouldn't disqualify a celeb from competing because we'd have no-one left if it did!