DS Forums

 
 

Panto 21/12/04


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22-12-2004, 12:17
JonDoe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 30,158
Originally Posted by Hotelier
Narinda. Maybe a bit loud for some peoples tastes, but honest, says what she thinks to peoples faces...
I've said it before, I'll say it again. That is not a virtue!
JonDoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 22-12-2004, 12:19
Evilsam
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 245
Is the panto actually live or is it possible that it was recorded some time ago, hence the lack of live streaming and interactive content?
Evilsam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2004, 12:21
Hotelier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 51°30'4.56"N 0° 8'31.21"W
Posts: 12,160
I'm surprised at Kittens reaction. She seems to be taking this way to seriously!. Still, good viewing, I wish there was more live coverage though. With no 24 hr live coverage, half an hout isn't enough, they would do better to have an hour of highlights, rather 30 mins highlights and 30 mins live.They could at least edit (apart from sound cuts) the ch 4 morning show to make it more interesting. Whats the point of having a repeat of 30 mins live coverage when its not live?. In fact, the morning show had less than last nights, we didnt get to see Kittens reaction to her casting.
Hotelier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2004, 12:26
Hotelier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 51°30'4.56"N 0° 8'31.21"W
Posts: 12,160
Originally Posted by Evilsam
Is the panto actually live or is it possible that it was recorded some time ago, hence the lack of live streaming and interactive content?
The second half hour on E4 is live, but time delayed by 15 minites. (Mel mentioned it was 9.30pm on monday nights show, at 9.45pm).
Tthe ch 4 morning show is just a repeat of the previous nights live coverage. with sound cuts footage editted out (ie any sound cuts , the whole period of the cut is removed for the ch 4 repeat).

Quite why they couldnt show the full casting this morning is beyond me, they had 12 hours to edit it. Instead we got 15 mins of mostly Narinda and Nick in the bedroom on this mornings show.
Hotelier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2004, 12:28
Hotelier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 51°30'4.56"N 0° 8'31.21"W
Posts: 12,160
Originally Posted by JonDoe
I've said it before, I'll say it again. That is not a virtue!
But but, you've just been honest to me to my 'face' as it were, so well done, I like that in a person
Thats why I like Narinda.
Hotelier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2004, 12:38
Evilsam
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 245
Originally Posted by Hotelier
The second half hour on E4 is live, but time delayed by 15 minites. (Mel mentioned it was 9.30pm on monday nights show, at 9.45pm).
Tthe ch 4 morning show is just a repeat of the previous nights live coverage. with sound cuts footage editted out (ie any sound cuts , the whole period of the cut is removed for the ch 4 repeat).

Quite why they couldnt show the full casting this morning is beyond me, they had 12 hours to edit it. Instead we got 15 mins of mostly Narinda and Nick in the bedroom on this mornings show.
Yes, but there's still nothing to show that this is actually live and happening now. They could have recorded the whole thing some time ago. I just don't understand why they would do this over christmas, especially Jade. Wouldn't she want to be with her kids?

If it was live, surely Channel 4/E4 would be showing more coverage? Considering BB is big business for the channel, you'd think they'd be making a bigger deal of it. It just doesn't make sense.
Evilsam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2004, 12:38
Omah
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 22,532
Apart from Cinders, what other part is left ?
Omah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2004, 12:41
Kayess
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,473
Well according to the official site, there's just "Fairy Hairdresser - The Fairy's personal, fashion-conscious stylist... Noone went for this role but since Jade spent quite some time giving Spencer a haircut on the second day, she could be a strong candidate if she doesn't get Cinders. "


http://www.channel4.com/entertainmen...tory.jsp?id=15
Kayess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2004, 12:47
Hotelier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 51°30'4.56"N 0° 8'31.21"W
Posts: 12,160
Originally Posted by Evilsam
Yes, but there's still nothing to show that this is actually live and happening now. They could have recorded the whole thing some time ago. I just don't understand why they would do this over christmas, especially Jade. Wouldn't she want to be with her kids?

If it was live, surely Channel 4/E4 would be showing more coverage? Considering BB is big business for the channel, you'd think they'd be making a bigger deal of it. It just doesn't make sense.
Its ill concieved and not thought out, I agree, 1/2 an hour is not enough, but its advertised as live , in the same way that normall bb interactive is advertised as live (ie 15 min delay for sound cuts to be implimented). They would be fined a huge amount by the governing body if it was all recorded some time ago, they just couldnt get away with it.
and someone would have seen them out and about, they'd all have to hide away for 3 weeks otherwise. The press would certainly get wind of it.
They do have xmas day and boxing day off to spend with their familys I believe.
Hotelier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2004, 12:48
Kayess
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,473
And Marco wouldn't have been on here a few days ago finishing his essays and looking forward to going in.
Kayess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2004, 13:06
Evilsam
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 245
Well call me a cynic but I'm not 100% convinced. Live coverage could be interpreted as unedited coverage. The time delay could be say two weeks I can't argue against the Marco thing, unless he is being very cunning and clever.
Evilsam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2004, 13:22
lulu g
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 43,553
Originally Posted by Evilsam
Well call me a cynic but I'm not 100% convinced. Live coverage could be interpreted as unedited coverage. The time delay could be say two weeks I can't argue against the Marco thing, unless he is being very cunning and clever.
Cue Dany ...
lulu g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2004, 14:00
JonDoe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 30,158
Originally Posted by Hotelier
But but, you've just been honest to me to my 'face' as it were, so well done, I like that in a person Thats why I like Narinda.
There's a difference between opposing an opinion in a forum for debate and pointing out personal character flaws in someone you barely know. That to me is self importance to the point of social ineptitude. It's a character trait of the spoiled brat.

...and that's why I don't like Narinder.
JonDoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2004, 14:15
Hotelier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 51°30'4.56"N 0° 8'31.21"W
Posts: 12,160
But calling someone a spoiled brat is pointing out a 'character flaw' isnt it?. Unless you personally know Narinda?.

In the end though I like her, you dont, I wont argue with that
Hotelier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2004, 14:33
JonDoe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 30,158
Originally Posted by Hotelier
But calling someone a spoiled brat is pointing out a 'character flaw' isnt it?)
Touché.

Maybe that's where the self-loathing comes from.
JonDoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2004, 15:34
cybergirl3
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 19,660
Originally Posted by JonDoe
I missed that bit.

Don't tell me. ....Narinder?
good guess, she said it to jade. She was talking about her agent and Jade's agent asking the producers of 'I'm a celeb...' and the entire protocol the celebs have to go through to get on the show.
cybergirl3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2004, 16:51
christygreer
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bangor, Co Down
Posts: 581
Hmmmmmm- the morning show's ABSOLUTELY NOT live by any definition of that word. I guessed that on the first morning when 2 of the housemates-Marco was one, I forget who the other was-were talking about things which should not feature on a morning TV show, and yet there were no sound cuts! Why do Channel 4 tell such LIES?
christygreer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2004, 17:52
Veri
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 90,778
Originally Posted by JonDoe
There's a difference between opposing an opinion in a forum for debate and pointing out personal character flaws in someone you barely know. That to me is self importance to the point of social ineptitude. It's a character trait of the spoiled brat.

...and that's why I don't like Narinder.
But why is it self importance?

Couldn't someone point to character flaws without any sense of self-importance?

Originally Posted by cybergirl3
Do they (really) think they are celebrities? They were just having a conversation about not being asked to in 'I am a celeb...'
Some of the people who've been in I'm a Celeb have been less well-known. And Heat (hack, spit) has a Q&A with Narinder in the current issue. "Celebrity" doesn't mean much more than that these days.
Veri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-12-2004, 18:25
JonDoe
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 30,158
Originally Posted by Veri
But why is it self importance?

Couldn't someone point to character flaws without any sense of self-importance?
'Someone' could, absolutely but not Narinder. Listen to her have a conversation with someone. Almost everything she has to say is relative to her, what she's done, what she's going to do, how she fits into a particular situation.

Everything about her reminds me of Shirley Valentine's description of men.
JonDoe is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:59.