Originally Posted by BellaFiga:
“I had to (had to! poor, poor me!) put "liz jones" into the Mail search box. Perhaps they thought this diary entry was a mawkish tear too far.”
The awful thing is, if you strip out the 'Liz' connection, it's a really sad thing to read today - a horse who's had a hard life, rescued, happy, but unable to overcome heath problems to the point where it's kinder to put them down. My grandfather kept horses and I earned my teenage pocket money mucking them out, feeding and looking after them. I got very attached to them and remember being devastated when my 'favourite' of them all had to be put down. From that point of view the story did provoke a personal emotive reaction in me. But none of that emotive reaction was was for Liz - and I'm pretty sure that's not what she intended when she wrote it!
If the events portrayed in today's diary had been written by someone else, or in isolation without all the other guff we've had to put up with over the weeks, months and years, I might have been able to include Liz in my emotive reaction, and others would also be reacting with more sympathy than derision. Somehow, Liz does a very good job of making feel derision on a regular basis, no matter what the subject matter.
Such a shame she can't see or understand how and why she strips out people's natural leaning towards sympathy for her being in some of the situations she describes, when we would most certainly have no trouble with that natural leaning with someone else's portrayal of them.