• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • Entertainment
  • Showbiz
Liz Jones - YOU magazine (Part 4)
<<
<
213 of 251
>>
>
CyanideCindy
04-07-2016
Remember the 'Facebook argument' which David's ex detailed on here?

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showt...80621&page=174

It seems that Dominodarling has not bothered posting in here since early March, (if she has, I missed it).
Jones' diary column on 3rd April details this argument:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/...continues.html

Odd, that - a cynic might think the whole thing had been engineered/written by Jones for the purpose of copy for her column 4 weeks later. Don't forget she allegedly had multiple fake profiles on Mumsnet when the fake rock star story was losing its impetus.
Ade_Lw
04-07-2016
Originally Posted by CyanideCindy:
“Remember the 'Facebook argument' which David's ex detailed on here?

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showt...80621&page=174

It seems that Dominodarling has not bothered posting in here since early March, (if she has, I missed it).
Jones' diary column on 3rd April details this argument:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/...continues.html

Odd, that - a cynic might think the whole thing had been engineered/written by Jones for the purpose of copy for her column 4 weeks later. Don't forget she allegedly had multiple fake profiles on Mumsnet when the fake rock star story was losing its impetus.
”


What struck me Cindy was the mentioning of the chin hairs. Does Lizbott talk about her chin hairs much these days ? If she does then I must have missed it.
Paula Panzer
04-07-2016
Originally Posted by CyanideCindy:
“Remember the 'Facebook argument' which David's ex detailed on here?

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showt...80621&page=174

It seems that Dominodarling has not bothered posting in here since early March, (if she has, I missed it).
Jones' diary column on 3rd April details this argument:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/...continues.html

Odd, that - a cynic might think the whole thing had been engineered/written by Jones for the purpose of copy for her column 4 weeks later. Don't forget she allegedly had multiple fake profiles on Mumsnet when the fake rock star story was losing its impetus.
”

I suspect Dominodarling (whose earlier posts point at her certainly not being Liz) has better things to do with her time than pursuing an argument against someone who resorts to petty insults about brands of shampoo.
amikolaichek
05-07-2016
I've sometimes wondered if the whole 'DominoDarling' thing was in fact Jones. Remember the comment in Private Eye, first pointed out here by 'Fatsia' . I quote:
"...But the creditors in her much-chronicled bankruptcy have been given a slightly different vision. Late last year they accepted her proposal to pay off her debts, as documented exhaustively if inconsistently in her column, at the rate of 24.82 pence in the pound. They were also offered this startling confession: "I would like to make my creditors aware that my column and any other article I write is ficticious. It is my job to write about an extravagant lifestyle. My professional persona and my real persona are significantly different, particularly financially.""


Of course, this may be just to throw her creditors off the scent. Hmmm. '... my column and any other article I write is fictitious ...' or maybe she's admitting to taking us all for credulous fools.
Suzy_Cat
05-07-2016
Originally Posted by CyanideCindy:
“Remember the 'Facebook argument' which David's ex detailed on here?

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showt...80621&page=174

It seems that Dominodarling has not bothered posting in here since early March, (if she has, I missed it).
Jones' diary column on 3rd April details this argument:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/...continues.html

Odd, that - a cynic might think the whole thing had been engineered/written by Jones for the purpose of copy for her column 4 weeks later. Don't forget she allegedly had multiple fake profiles on Mumsnet when the fake rock star story was losing its impetus.
”

Well yeah, of course Liz would have hassled DD on FB to create drama she could use for copy.
vampyre
09-07-2016
So last week she was a near to nice as she can get.
This week it's a rant and venom fest.
Checking to see which gets the ratings are you Lizard?
Suzy_Cat
10-07-2016
I can't find an updated Dreary this week at all...
newbaby
10-07-2016
Originally Posted by Suzy_Cat:
“I can't find an updated Dreary this week at all...”

Ditto
Suky M
10-07-2016
Here is the link:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/...ster-week.html

To think she gets paid more than well for this drivel
BellaFiga
10-07-2016
It may be mean, but I really hope Nic does take her to a tribunal. She must be utter hell to work for.
Suzy_Cat
10-07-2016
How very dare Nic expect to be paid her agreed wages.

Jones would have a hysterical sh*t fit if the DM withheld a cent of her pay, But Nic should just graciously agree to work for nothing and hand over her money to boot. Like Nana in Ballet Shoes.
newbaby
10-07-2016
Thank you for providing the link.

"Exmoor isn't proper countryside"...a words'-failing moment.

Nic "too heavy" to ride out...another words'-failing moment.

Nic/wages: I wonder how accurately - or properly - the PAYE has been conducted vis-a-vis provision of accommodation/utilities (inc Council Tax) within employment rules. That Nic, apparently, says - or shouts through the letterbox - that she'll take LJ to a tribunal suggests that Nic has been a salaried employee, rather than a self-employed person with several jobs.

Tantric Adrian was nearly funny. That's a first.
seventhwave
10-07-2016
Meanwhile Liz rants about "too many" female leaders, describes Ruth Kelly as looking like "an Eastern European refugee", and says "The Queen has lasted so long because she has never had to race round the supermarket in her lunch hour." No Liz, it's because the Queen is unelected, doesn't make laws herself, and there is no time limit on her reign ...
lomo123
10-07-2016
Oh dear, looks like the wheels have truly came off.
Hope they both have the arrangement down legally. Seems like a lot of blurred line, re, duties, time off, who pays who.
Is this the end?.
Peskypoo2
10-07-2016
I think Nic's FB Profile picture says it all...
rosariofire
10-07-2016
Originally Posted by amikolaichek:
“I've sometimes wondered if the whole 'DominoDarling' thing was in fact Jones. Remember the comment in Private Eye, first pointed out here by 'Fatsia' . I quote:
"...But the creditors in her much-chronicled bankruptcy have been given a slightly different vision. Late last year they accepted her proposal to pay off her debts, as documented exhaustively if inconsistently in her column, at the rate of 24.82 pence in the pound. They were also offered this startling confession: "I would like to make my creditors aware that my column and any other article I write is ficticious. It is my job to write about an extravagant lifestyle. My professional persona and my real persona are significantly different, particularly financially.""


Of course, this may be just to throw her creditors off the scent. Hmmm. '... my column and any other article I write is fictitious ...' or maybe she's admitting to taking us all for credulous fools.”

I can assure you DominoDarling is a REAL person and not an invention of Liz Jones. A little basic investigating on social media will yield her true identity, and prove she is indeed David Scrace's ex partner.
CyanideCindy
10-07-2016
Originally Posted by rosariofire:
“I can assure you DominoDarling is a REAL person and not an invention of Liz Jones. A little basic investigating on social media will yield her true identity, and prove she is indeed David Scrace's ex partner.”

I'm well aware that D. Scrace has an ex-partner and that was who the poster Dominodarling was supposed to be. And it may have been her.

However, it was somewhat coincidental that she began posting on here a few times, then posted the whole Facebook message argument incident on here - and a month later it's copy for Jones' diary column.

For one thing I'd be surprised if Jones knew David's FB password and even if she did, I think it's technically illegal to access someone else's FB messages without their permission and to impersonate them.

Jones (allegedly) has previous form for posting on other social media to draw attention to her column.
rosariofire
10-07-2016
Originally Posted by CyanideCindy:
“I'm well aware that D. Scrace has an ex-partner and that was who the poster Dominodarling was supposed to be. And it may have been her.

However, it was somewhat coincidental that she began posting on here a few times, then posted the whole Facebook message argument incident on here - and a month later it's copy for Jones' diary column.

For one thing I'd be surprised if Jones knew David's FB password and even if she did, I think it's technically illegal to access someone else's FB messages without their permission and to impersonate them.
Jones (allegedly) has previous form for posting on other social media to draw attention to her column.”

No, I know for a fact that DominoDarling is who she says she is, a mutual acquaintance encouraged her to post on here. So I'm afraid that conspiracy theory is dead in the water.
amikolaichek
10-07-2016
Originally Posted by rosariofire:
“I can assure you DominoDarling is a REAL person and not an invention of Liz Jones. A little basic investigating on social media will yield her true identity, and prove she is indeed David Scrace's ex partner.”

Yes, I know the real ex girlfriend of The Baker exists and I know her real name ... but the 'DominoDarling' posts here possibly MAY not have been written by the actual lady in question, who, looking at her FB page, is extremely attractive and has really great hair - fantastic advertisement for Garnier Fructis! As to whatever shampoo Jones uses ... Fairy Liquid? Cillit Bang?

As someone posted earlier, Jones does have 'form' for assuming other names, as in Mumsnet.
rosariofire
10-07-2016
[quote=amikolaichek;83113293]Yes, I know the real ex girlfriend of The Baker exists and I know her real name ... but the 'DominoDarling' posts here possibly MAY not have been written by the actual lady in question, who, looking at her FB page, is extremely attractive and has really great hair - fantastic advertisement for Garnier Fructis! As to whatever shampoo Jones uses ... Fairy Liquid? Cillit Bang?

See my last post please.
amikolaichek
10-07-2016
[quote=rosariofire;83113724]
Originally Posted by amikolaichek:
“Yes, I know the real ex girlfriend of The Baker exists and I know her real name ... but the 'DominoDarling' posts here possibly MAY not have been written by the actual lady in question, who, looking at her FB page, is extremely attractive and has really great hair - fantastic advertisement for Garnier Fructis! As to whatever shampoo Jones uses ... Fairy Liquid? Cillit Bang?

See my last post please.”


OK, it really WAS DD who posted here, 'encouraged by a mutual acquaintance'.

Still, all a bit odd, as pointed out by CyanideCindy above, but I suppose we must put it down to 'synchronicity' or something
Ade_Lw
10-07-2016
Originally Posted by Suky M:
“Here is the link:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/you/...ster-week.html

To think she gets paid more than well for this drivel ”

Cheers for the link. For some reason mail on line is only showing last week's offering.

Well if this week's main gripe is all about being paid to do a job, then what about you Lizbott, you're paid zillions to entertain us yet we have to resort to coming here, so where's the value for money in your case ?

Oh and thanks for the name check, gona pass on the tantric sex though
amikolaichek
10-07-2016
Today's 'Farticle' - what happened? It ended mid-sentence. Perhaps Jones knocked over a mug of Prose .... vegan still water over her ancient laptop keyboard without legible keys and, in despair, didn't finish the piece.

Honestly, doesn't anyone at the MoS SUB her stuff?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...lly-shoes.html
alaninmcr
10-07-2016
She claims that because Nic would not drive her to/from the station, she "had to get a taxi at 5am, and a taxi back: hundreds of pounds." Does that mean she took a taxi all the way to London? It cannot cost hundreds for a taxi from Richmond to Darlington where there is a direct train to London.
Dominodarling
11-07-2016
It is me. I was advised to keep quiet so that she would have nothing to write about as I find it quite distressing. I posted the whole FB saga as I realised she would and so I got in there first with the correct version. BTW unpleasant reading this week about tantric sex. Definitely wish I could unread that one. And I actually don't use Garnier Fructis.
<<
<
213 of 251
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map