Not for the first time, I am confused by the timelines here. The Dreary seems to run about a month behind her actual life, so the 'cliffhanger' ending must have not resulted in a breakup, given that David was still around to 'kidnap' Prudence fairly recently. God knows whose cat it is, but the police should have better things to do than log this as a 'crime' and devote valuable resources to 'solving' it - it's not like the animal's whereabouts are unknown. It seems so completely out of character for David to act in this way, I am sure there must be more to the story than is being written. But she has now accused him in print of kidnap /theft and I am surprised that the DM's lawyers have permitted this, without the usual bit at the end about having contacted 'the accused' (or their representative) for a comment.
Her PS about the apparent attempted email fraud is more interesting, but if true, I don't understand why these fraudsters didn't just have her transfer the money to their bank account first time around? She says both emails were fraudulent, but that she acted on the first one and transferred this money - so why on earth would they have then returned it and asked her to do it again, to a different account, thereby causing even Liz to become suspicious???
Her PS about the apparent attempted email fraud is more interesting, but if true, I don't understand why these fraudsters didn't just have her transfer the money to their bank account first time around? She says both emails were fraudulent, but that she acted on the first one and transferred this money - so why on earth would they have then returned it and asked her to do it again, to a different account, thereby causing even Liz to become suspicious???




