Originally Posted by HeatherD:
“Did you actually go and see one of her performances?”
Originally Posted by Iknowicould:
“And waste good money and my sweet precious time?
As for the money, a donation to charity would be a far better way to spend it than watch her "performance".
As for the time, curling up to watch a new DVD with some warm beverage would be much more enjoyable - probably the Lord Of The Rings Trilogy that I have always wanted to watch.”
Originally Posted by HeatherD:
“Don't post about her performances being 'disastrous and incomprensible' then if you haven't even been to watch one. Sit and enjoy your DVD and malt drink, instead.”
I knew all along that some avid and possibly misguided fans of Nadia might seek to re-write histrory as far as the object of their fascination and worship is concerned.
For this reason, I bookmarked this thread for easy recall and sure enough it is happening as I anticipated from the above posts.
Do you have to be a priest or a mullah to know right from wrong?
Suddenly, it becomes a crime to post about a performance no one can pay me to watch, when eye witness accounts of the "rubbish" of a performance have already informed the forum it was a disaster as far as Nadia was concerned.
Nadia's fans can argue with the facts all day long, and then argue among themselves to their hearts content. Or until they feel better.
As for the anti-Nadia faction, we know the truth about the fraudster. The eyes do not lie.
Last edited by Iknowicould : 13-02-2005 at 06:58