• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
This whole BB Panto is Cack
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
dave071
29-12-2004
Discuss, this must be the worst idea ever. All the little Z listers back on TV for what purpose?
Juicy Bug
29-12-2004
I wouldn't call Jade "little"
dave071
29-12-2004
True, but isnt it time they let go and went back to something else. Jade could go back to being the back end of a bus.
Juicy Bug
29-12-2004
I quite enjoy watching the continued delusions of these people. Narrinder's desperation in particular makes me laugh.

I think they should have come up with a better idea than a panto to get them all in a house together though.
Eusebius
29-12-2004
Are you sure they are Z listers?


Anyway I have been watching but don't really see the point of it. It certainly hasn't caught the media or public imagination.

The interesting thing is that the conclusion to draw, whether one likes it or not, is that BB contestants are rather like Pot Noodles.

CLL Dodge
29-12-2004
Marco was great fun tonight, though. And Anouska in tight jeans...
swingaleg
29-12-2004
Originally Posted by Eusebius:
“The interesting thing is that the conclusion to draw, whether one likes it or not, is that BB contestants are rather like Pot Noodles.

”


I can see that with Marco, dry and shrivelled until combined with hot water.
dave071
29-12-2004
I am suprised that they havent pulled it. The viewing figures are non existent. As for Z list I was being kind although I guess they are still trying to freeload for Britain. I think I heard a new reality gameshow for them all: Celebrity Minefield Clearance
Omah
29-12-2004
Originally Posted by BBDodge:
“And Anouska in tight jeans...”

Go on .....
Veri
29-12-2004
Originally Posted by dave071:
“I am suprised that they havent pulled it. The viewing figures are non existent.”

Do we know that? Are they worse than typical E4 shows?

It's also part of T4 on C4. How good or bad are the numbers for a C4 show on at that time at this time of year?
anna123
29-12-2004
i think its alright. Not as good as big brother but its still entertaining.
Suprised its not doing well (if thats true?)
Venus Lady
29-12-2004
Have they announced who is playing Cinders yet?

(Sorry if I am behind the times )
Omah
29-12-2004
See thread immediately below this one or click :

http://forum.digitalspy.co.uk/board/...d.php?t=178690
Venus Lady
29-12-2004
Originally Posted by Omah:
“See thread immediately below this one or click :

http://forum.digitalspy.co.uk/board/...d.php?t=178690”




I did just notice, sowwee
Omah
29-12-2004
No problem .......
Inspiration
29-12-2004
I'm shocked it's been running for as long as it has! Why on earth didn't they just do this over one weekend, it would have been far more watchable.
Hotelier
29-12-2004
The viewing figures are not important to them for this show. its a training run for BB later on in the year. ie new production staff(camera crew, etc etc) have to be trained up, etc etc so its a good little 'live' exercise in staff training, without costing to much money.
Omah
29-12-2004
Originally Posted by Hotelier:
“The viewing figures are not important to them for this show. its a training run for BB later on in the year. ie new production staff(camera crew, etc etc) have to be trained up, etc etc so its a good little 'live' exercise in staff training, without costing to much money.”

And your information comes from whom ?
FinalBroadcast
29-12-2004
Originally Posted by Hotelier:
“The viewing figures are not important to them for this show. its a training run for BB later on in the year. ie new production staff(camera crew, etc etc) have to be trained up, etc etc so its a good little 'live' exercise in staff training, without costing to much money.”

Not to mention a great PR exercise for CBB in January - remind people that BB exists, and then start flashing up the CBB Idents!
jamez
29-12-2004
As far as i'm concerned, any Big Brother is better than no Big Brother. I would much sooner be watching this rather than an old episode of Friends i've seen a thousand times
Hotelier
29-12-2004
Originally Posted by Omah:
“And your information comes from whom ?”

Iits obvious to me. if it was a genuine show it would be done much better and would have been on channel 4 in the evenings, complete with live host etc etc.

Naw, its obvious its a training run. I might be wrong, but I doubt it.
FinalBroadcast
29-12-2004
The only thing I'd say to disagree with that, is that the Xmas ratings are a big, big thing and could Channel 4 really afford to throw out a BB Panto at Xmas, without knowing what the resulting viewing would be? I think that it just signals that the BB Franchise/Cash Cow is on its last legs.
Omah
29-12-2004
Originally Posted by Hotelier:
“Iits obvious to me. if it was a genuine show it would be done much better and would have been on channel 4 in the evenings, complete with live host etc etc.

Naw, its obvious its a training run. I might be wrong, but I doubt it.”

So it's just your opinion then and not fact (as you presented it) .....
Hotelier
29-12-2004
Originally Posted by Omah:
“So it's just your opinion then and not fact (as you presented it) .....”

Is that your opinon?
and do you guys just want to start an argument on purpose?.

You asked me how I arrived at my conclusions, I told you how, end of bloody story.
FinalBroadcast
29-12-2004
Originally Posted by Hotelier:
“Is that your opinon?
and do you guys just want to start an argument on purpose?.

You asked me how I arrived at my conclusions, I told you how, end of bloody story.”

Calm down guys - geez, it's like being in another thread.

I'm right, you're wrong.

End of.
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map