Originally Posted by
iaindb:
“Was last night the rating that secured Brightest a second series? I have a horrible feeling it might.
”
I don't see why that would be a terrible thing? There seemed nothing particularly offensive about the show itself. The format needs some work but it's got enough potential and there's clearly a reasonable audience there.
What was disappointing is that the BBC seemed to consider it 'big' enough to use as an anchor for the evening. Clearly it didn't have the capacity to do that and never did, even on paper. But if it came back to form part of a different schedule - with a Doctor Who, The Voice or Strictly there to act as the nights big anchor - then it seems perfectly reasonable.
There we see why the BBC are willing to part with big money for the Six Nations - and why it seems to place so highly on their list of sporting priorities. It's a genuine whole-UK event and is in fact
the sporting event of the year for certain audiences.
Makes the event worth a little more than the sum of it's parts to the BBC, I think. Especially when they're so sensitive about being South East-centric.
Originally Posted by Tassium:
“I imagine that ITV have a larger proportion of 18-49 year olds than BBC1 in their ratings.
Would be interesting to see the actual demographic breakdown since a straight numbers comparison of such radically different channels no longer makes any sense.
When BBC1 was for people of all ages..., when ITV was for men as well as women...
Both channels once upon a time were fighting for the same audience, I don't see that from them anymore. Most of the time anyway.”
I've not got the figures to hand, but I think it'd be pretty close.If they do, is not by an absolutely enormous amount.
It's easy to look at X Factor versus Strictly and assume that speaks for the age appeal of the respective channels, but its not wholly the case. In terms of younger age groups, the BBC is in a better position from the off on weekdays because EastEnders comes in younger than the ITV soaps. Waterloo Road is young too. And a good proportion of their non-drama does surprisingly well in 18-49's: comedies, The Apprentice, Masterchef or natural history docs.
From memory, the split between BBC One and ITV1 is more pronounced when looking at gender (ITV has a much heavier female skew) and economic groups (BBC One does better with ABC1's)
Originally Posted by Charnham:
“that Doctor Who budget cut is shocking, and a poor decision by the BBC.”
Lets not fly off the handle on the basis of someones unsourced post on an internet forum. I imagine Doctor Who funding is pretty complex, coming in from a variety of sources. It might be the case that the domestic license fee portion of the funding has dropped in recent years - but didn't BBC America come on-board as a co-producer a year or two back?
Certainly going off what we've seen on screen - I've not witnessed any discernible drop in the quality of guest stars, special effects, CGI work, location shoots. etc. In fact, much of that seems better than ever!
So I wouldn't concern myself about it - but I understand big Who fans have something of an anxiety complex when it comes to how the BBC treats their show.
Stop worrying: They're not going to cancel it (again) any time soon! 