Great British Menu Series 8 |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Swashbuckling on Melee Island.
Posts: 18,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,062
|
So I'm not the only one who didn't know about this new series. I thought I just hadn't been paying enough attention to BBC trailers and schedules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stalking David and Neal
Services: Whatever David or Neal require
Posts: 30,176
|
Quote:
(which isn't entirely fair to Adam who is probably a lovely bloke )Liking Matt though, and Tom's replies to Richard's attempts to get him to admit there might be something wrong with his dishes, 'Is there maybe a little too much xxxxx' 'No', 'Is that xxxxx exactly how you wanted it' 'Yes'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,229
|
Quote:
His behaviour was childish and I'm sure he regretted it later but the damage was done. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 20
|
I noticed it on the TV guide last night - I've not seen any promos for it at all, which is surprising. [Especially if it is Comic Relief focused.]
I have been watching it since the very first series. Part of me used to like how strange a lot of the food items and cooking methods were [in comparison to things we have at home], but last night's episode just got on my nerves. So much fake drama. So pretenious! I'm not sure if I can be bothered with it. It seems to be at loggerheads with the comic relief goal for a start lol. :/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | ||
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,754
|
Quote:
Sorry, completely irrelevant to anything important, but it's ridiculous how programmes like this divide up the country! Makes me feel homesick, though - and I will be even more the week that heat is on! I spent half of my childhood at my best friend's house which backs on to The Plough - it used to just be 'a pub my Dad drank in', nothing special, but now so many 'famous' people live nearby obviously someone saw a gap in the market, and good on them. But to me it'll always be the pub we huddled in to keep warm when we went to Bonfire Night on Kingham Village green when I was a child! Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5,985
|
It was scallops to be fair. Very different to smoked salmon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5,985
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Up North
Posts: 36,154
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Up North
Posts: 36,154
|
Quote:
He comes across looking like a prick with the comments he comes out with. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 511
|
Sick to the back teeth with this, already.
"Where's the humour?" "He'll have to inject some humour into his dish." ""I can't find the humour" "Does the dish have sense of humour?" !! What a load of pretentious arse! The only thing worse than hearing Corrigan wittering on about it would be the three judges, but I won't be seeing that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Up North
Posts: 36,154
|
Corrigan seems to be one of the worst at this criticising. It's like he's completely sold out and is saying what is coming through his ear.
He's a top chef and must have more to give than he's shown as a judge in the past few series. Personally i've come to prefer the earlier format (apart from Jennie Bond ) without the judging chef,
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5,985
|
Of course it's the point. There is a huge difference between an everyday dish like smoked salmon and a dish like raw scallops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Up North
Posts: 36,154
|
No it's not the point. You seem to be making up your own argument.
We are talking about the best chefs in the country here. There would be no reason for him to raise an eyebrow to Aikens method apart from faux tension. |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5,985
|
You don't see the difference between an everyday item like smoked salmon and a raw scallop? Really?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 308
|
Quote:
However, the answer to he oft repeated question will probably be when the food is served up to the judges and they say " you've got to be joking!" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5,985
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Up North
Posts: 36,154
|
Quote:
That was the point. The raised eyebrow. The faux tension. For what it's worth I had sushi last week. Smoked salmon, raw mackerel and raw tuna (no scallops though, probably too expensive). That was from a supermarket so I don't see the difference between smoked salmon and raw/marinated/pickled fish and neither do plenty of others especially these days with the influences from Japan and South America. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5,985
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Up North
Posts: 36,154
|
Well if a top chef prepared it for you and you refused to even try it then I feel that would be a wasted opportunity.
It scored an 8 didn't it? So can't have been that bad after all. Smoked salmon = cured fish Marniated scallop = cured fish Plenty of people eating pickled fish, sashimi, ceviche and poke Conversly there's probably plenty of people who haven't eaten smoked salmon and would balk at the idea of it - what? raw fish. eugh!!! Personally i'd take marinated scallop over smoked salmon any day. Especially if prepared by one of the country's top chefs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5,985
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 | |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,165
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 445
|
I still enjoy the programme but as always the brief, or rather the continual reference to it by the judge, spoils it.
This particular year is going to be especially irritating as a potentially inferior dish should not get more points just because the chef gives it a funny name or puts bells and whistles round the plate or brings it to the pass in drag dressed as a waitress or any other gimmick. Putting that aside though it doesn't seem that failure to make any attempt to meet the brief is being reflected in the marks as Adam has done quite well. It's difficult to be too critical of marking without having tasted the food ourselves but I just get the feeling the chef judging the food has pretty much made up his mind who is going through before the week begins and it seems very difficult for a newcomer to beat established chefs. Then again maybe the more established chefs are just better. One other theme to the marking in previous series though hasn't carried on this week. Previously I would say often the chef in third place would have been given a point more than the second placed chef to keep the competition alive and this wasn't the case this week. A final observation - Corrigan seems less stern than he has been (or has acted) in previous series and seems more generous with his marks or is it just me that has that perception ? |
|
|
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:43.





(which isn't entirely fair to Adam who is probably a lovely bloke
) without the judging chef,