|
||||||||
No increase in apple award and no retrial |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,342
|
No increase in apple award and no retrial
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,636
|
I thought that was the appeal. I read that judgement as meaning "no Apple, you're not getting any more money than you've already been awarded" and "Samsung, pay up what you've been told".
I just wish they'd finish it and get on with making phones. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,342
|
I suspect they are both a little fed up with this especially with yet another trial looming, although I feel apples liklehood for success diminishing with each case so you never know something may be sorted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 906
|
I just wish Samsung would stop dragging this out, pay the amount a court of law ordered them to and put it behind them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,474
|
Gosh someone likes reporting posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 906
|
Quote:
Gosh someone likes reporting posts
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,474
|
Quote:
If someone has reported a post that would be confidential, as would the out come. Commenting on such things on the public boards is a violation of the terms of use of this board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 3,345
|
I always miss the juicy posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,474
|
Quote:
I always miss the juicy posts
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,342
|
No it wasn't did someone tell teacher on you
.. pathetic
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,474
|
To clarify I am obviously NOT referring to any recent incidents but it would seem that its fine to be sexist, company-ist or hide obscene language by replacing letters with similar looking numbers ....
but i would advise people out there that likening anyone to one of Jim Hensons loveable puppets is a DS no-no
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,342
|
Quote:
To clarify I am obviously NOT referring to any recent incidents but it would seem that its fine to be sexist, company-ist or hide obscene language by replacing letters with similar looking numbers ....
but i would advise people out there that likening anyone to one of Jim Hensons loveable puppets is a DS no-no ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,474
|
Back on topic it would be good to see less money being spent from both sides on legal costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,342
|
We ain't at that point yet though unfortunately
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,058
|
The article infers the judgement will stand, but arent the key Apple patents in question due to prior art?
Wasnt the question regarding the patents something that Samsung were not allowed to bring up in their trial? Wont this mean Samsung end up paying substantially less than the 1 billion dollars? (And also be in a position to counter sue Apple) Is the top dog battle already over and Samsung have won
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
|
That's worded like a win for Apple then.
They ask for more in order to counteract appeals. Anyway, its probably on gold for a long while yet if you consider that so many of the crass patents are still in patent office the annul process. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,342
|
Quote:
The article infers the judgement will stand, but arent the key Apple patents in question due to prior art?
Wasnt the question regarding the patents something that Samsung were not allowed to bring up in their trial? Wont this mean Samsung end up paying substantially less than the 1 billion dollars? (And also be in a position to counter sue Apple) Is the top dog battle already over and Samsung have won ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 9,293
|
Quote:
I just wish Samsung would stop dragging this out, pay the amount a court of law ordered them to and put it behind them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
|
Quote:
on gold ..
Obviously I meant to type 'on hold' for that gold. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 9,293
|
Quote:
If someone has reported a post that would be confidential, as would the out come. Commenting on such things on the public boards is a violation of the terms of use of this board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 30,072
|
Quote:
For someone who just had a rather long holiday, you have a cheek spouting rules and regulations!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 14,219
|
I think the judge should of reduced the amount of damages awarded to Apple. She has messed up on this verdict and I think she knows it. However saying that Samsung did not wilfully copy apple won't rectify it. She needs to reduce the damages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,501
|
Quote:
I think the judge should of reduced the amount of damages awarded to Apple. She has messed up on this verdict and I think she knows it. However saying that Samsung did not wilfully copy apple won't rectify it. She needs to reduce the damages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,967
|
Apple needs to chill out and Sammy needs to pay the Fruity ones.
I don't feel it's the last of the big litigation... Sony are tipped to be suing everyone next and will probably win. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 906
|
Quote:
For someone who just had a rather long holiday, you have a cheek spouting rules and regulations!!
The guy also claimed he worked in subscriptions an had no idea about the forums, lol but they're happy enough to take money. I guess someone who has never paid a penny on any Hearst products managed to get a paying customer suspended, great business model lol. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:29.


