|
||||||||
Steve's right arm,left arm,right leg, left leg |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 15,258
|
Steve's right arm,left arm,right leg, left leg
G4 have a thread why do G4 fans feel the need to keep bumping up all the member threads. It doesn't make G4 look any more popular since all you see is the same people posting the same thing on mutiple threads.
Whats wrong with the G4 thread? Or are you just waiting for the day when they split up? |
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 30,316
|
I don't care if G4 split, stay together, make millions, make pennies, go to superstardom, go back to busking. They/ their music just don't appeal to me. They seem lovely lads though, just I don't give them much thought.
There I managed to say all that without so much as a bit of G4 bashing, pity some can't get their point across about Steve in such a way Oh well, we can't expect miracles can we?Back to the thread title though I think you have missed some of Steve's more important body parts out
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,054
|
[quote=Susann]I don't care if G4 split, stay together, make millions, make pennies, go to superstardom, go back to busking. They/ their music just don't appeal to me. They seem lovely lads though, just I don't give them much thought.
[quote] Well i feel exactly the same about Steve! See, I can manage to say it without the slightest hint of Steve-bashing. And I'm a Team G4er. There's no point slagging off other contestants - at the end of the day they are people, just like you and me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,606
|
Is it me or is this thread childish?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 30,316
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by emzy.c.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Susann
I don't care if G4 split, stay together, make millions, make pennies, go to superstardom, go back to busking. They/ their music just don't appeal to me. They seem lovely lads though, just I don't give them much thought.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 15,258
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xIxLUVxG4x
Is it me or is this thread childish?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,606
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whip
No it's a question about multiple postings of the same messages clogging up the thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 15,258
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xIxLUVxG4x
but if people like whip, etc don't post on it than it shouldn't really bother them, should it?
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 30,316
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xIxLUVxG4x
but if people like whip, etc don't post on it than it shouldn't really bother them, should it?
I think the gist/point of the thread is, Lola, that some are just posting any meaningless stuff they can about G4, just to get as many G4 threads up as they can. I actually find some of it a bit demeaning to G4 at times by there so-called fan's. I for one just need to read the title of some of the threads to stop me venturing in. I do tend to visit most of the other threads, ie : Tabby ones, Rowetta one, even if just to read but not post, obviously Steve ones etc;, but some of the G4 ones can seem pointless and do look like they are there just to push as many G4 thread to the top as possible. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,606
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whip
I read all the threads to see if anything interesting going on. So yes it does bother me that I have to read the same posts over and over again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,054
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Susann
I think the gist/point of the thread is, Lola, that some are just posting any meaningless stuff they can about G4, just to get as many G4 threads up as they can. I actually find some of it a bit demeaning to G4 at times by there so-called fan's.
I for one just need to read the title of some of the threads to stop me venturing in. I do tend to visit most of the other threads, ie : Tabby ones, Rowetta one, even if just to read but not post, obviously Steve ones etc;, but some of the G4 ones can seem pointless and do look like they are there just to push as many G4 thread to the top as possible. Moan about us if you like, I personally don't care, but you've got no grounds to criticise us for doing that when the Stevettes are doing exactly the same thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 15,258
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xIxLUVxG4x
If it bothers you than why do you read it?
![]() Sorry. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,856
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whip
G4 have a thread why do G4 fans feel the need to keep bumping up all the member threads. It doesn't make G4 look any more popular since all you see is the same people posting the same thing on mutiple threads.
Whats wrong with the G4 thread? Or are you just waiting for the day when they split up? ![]() I've now looked and you're absolutely right. Why? I haven't the fggiest idea unless it's to make them seem more important. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 15,258
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by emzy.c.
Yet its perfectly fine to litter the 1st page with endless threads about Steve. All of which contain exactly the same stuff.
Moan about us if you like, I personally don't care, but you've got no grounds to criticise us for doing that when the Stevettes are doing exactly the same thing. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,606
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whip
I read the threads for some reason my spider sense seems incapable of telling me if the post is the same one as posted on another thread without acually reading it.
Sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 30,316
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by emzy.c.
Yet its perfectly fine to litter the 1st page with endless threads about Steve. All of which contain exactly the same stuff.
Moan about us if you like, I personally don't care, but you've got no grounds to criticise us for doing that when the Stevettes are doing exactly the same thing. I think you will find where most of the G4 threads I was trying to explain to Lola about, were about mostly imo silly meaningless stuff, started just to boost as many G4 threads to the top as possible, as if it mattered. In contrast most Steve threads have been started by Steve bashers, not Steve fan's themselves. We have no need of starting up meaningless threads, and only start a thread we feel relevant in most cases, as in the chart success of Steve. Didn't take you long to revert did it
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,658
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by emzy.c.
Yet its perfectly fine to litter the 1st page with endless threads about Steve. All of which contain exactly the same stuff.
Moan about us if you like, I personally don't care, but you've got no grounds to criticise us for doing that when the Stevettes are doing exactly the same thing. There are however 5 threads which are basically just appreciation threads for G4 - the main app one, plus one each for Jon, Matt, Ben and Mike. If these threads were just used to post different things about each guy it would be fine, but some people just go onto each of these threads and post exactly the same thing, which means that all 5 of them are constantly on the first page and contain a lot of identical posts. I agree with Whip that I think it's a bit daft. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,856
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whip
4 pro or neutral thread about steve (all asking different things) on front page. How many G4 threads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,606
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by *Eileen*
There are however 5 threads which are basically just appreciation threads for G4 - the main app one, plus one each for Jon, Matt, Ben and Mike.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,054
|
So what about the times when the page was FULL and i mean FULL of
I hate g4 G4 are crap Jonathan is a w****r G4 can't sing and other negative G4 posts like that - I suppose we started them too did we. I appreciate there is a certain amount of 'bumoing' going on. Just because it happens on threads ive started doesn't mean i agree with it! *sighs* whats the point. you're all too blinded by ur own thoughts to listen. and for the record i haven't "reverted" anyway. I always have been and always will be a G4 supporter. Whether u like it or not |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,856
|
I like the title of this thread.It reminds me of one of Eileen's jigsaws
All the parts of Steve all being placed in their right place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,606
|
...This is a happy thread to start the new year.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 15,258
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xIxLUVxG4x
We started those threads because of complaints that Jon was getting too much attention and the other were being ignored.....
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,606
|
...Because not everyone would've read them and would of thought that they were just being ignored.......and im not posting anymore negative things today as its New Years Day..........Resolution: To not post on negative threads as steve and G4 fans get along perfectly well now...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 30,316
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by emzy.c.
So what about the times when the page was FULL and i mean FULL of
I hate g4 G4 are crap Jonathan is a w****r G4 can't sing and other negative G4 posts like that - I suppose we started them too did we. I appreciate there is a certain amount of 'bumoing' going on. Just because it happens on threads ive started doesn't mean i agree with it! *sighs* whats the point. you're all too blinded by ur own thoughts to listen. and for the record i haven't "reverted" anyway. I always have been and always will be a G4 supporter. Whether u like it or not This disscussion was about the now, not the then. And I will say again I haven't started any G4 or Steve or any other threads on here on any of the acts as yet, as I haven't felt the need as yet. We are not blinded, that is an arrogant thing for you to suggest, maybe because you know you have no justified arguement in this case. As for you always being a G4 supporter, are still now and you always will be, good for you. Why should you being a G4 supporter be a problem for me ? I am not bothered who anyone on this forum supports, that was not what was being debated here.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:34.




Oh well, we can't expect miracles can we?
I think you have missed some of Steve's more important body parts out