|
||||||||
TNA Wrestling on Challenge TV (Part 2) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#4076 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,347
|
Talk now of Awesome Kong and Taryn Terrell may have left the company as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#4077 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 37,008
|
Quote:
Probably a silly question, anybody planning on watching live tonight for what could possibly TNA's final PPV event?
Must admit though the only thing I want to see is where the Jarrett thing is going if he wins I assume it's part of a bigger plan |
|
|
|
|
|
#4078 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,403
|
Quote:
In the past week they have lost.
Aries. Low Ki Storm Magnus. Edit to add. Gunner Sam Shaw Not released all quit. Aries and Storm are big losses. Storm is an original, a solid worker and over with TNA crowds. Aries is a phenomenal athlete and probably the only new "top star" TNA made over the last five years. Magnus was OK but never main-event material. Low Ki is a great athlete but his best days are behind him, and he was always just going to be an X-Division talent anyway. Gunner and Sam Shaw are no losses at all. I think all of this talk of this being TNA's last event and them being on the verge of ending is very premature. Say what you want about this company, but they actually have a very successful track record when it comes to working the internet. Remember Devon being "released", only to show up at BFG as the first member of the Aces & Eights? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4079 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 31,653
|
Quote:
Talk now of Awesome Kong and Taryn Terrell may have left the company as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4080 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,167
|
I wonder if the releasing of people who's contracts have expired is a cost saving move and they'll still appear on the next tapings on pay-per-appearance deals. Makes sense for TNA to get guaranteed expenses off the books and let those guys take bookings with GFW, ROH, PWG and whoever in the meantime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4081 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 37,008
|
I would say Aries quit as yes his contact was up but from what I have read they wanted him to sign a new one and he turned them down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4082 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,700
|
The truth of the matter is Jarrett does not have a TV deal for GFW. He's still an old carny at heart and now he knows the writing is on the wall for TNA as does TNA and there is 3 months to not only get those numbers up higher but to keep everything ticking along for Jarrett's GFW because if TNA go under who in their right mind is going to give TV time for Jarrett?
According to Vince Russo one of the major problems over the years was the heat between Jarret and Dixie and the fact that Jarrett lost his investor literally weeks into TNA starting and when Dixie's family put the money up they bought a majority share, for all that time until he left TNA he felt as though he should run TNA the way he wanted while everyone else around Jarrett knew this was wrong because he didn't have any authority to do it. He wanted Dixie to put the money up for TNA and keep TNA going but he wanted to run it and the truth was he couldn't, he didn't have the money, if the Carter's hadn't stepped in the company would have been out of business within a few weeks. And Russo also said that Kurt Angle found out they were there when his kids came running into the dressing room and said hello to him. Dixie never once let on that Jeff would be coming let alone Karen and his kids. I feel really bad for Kurt. And without saying too much about Impact, I also hope that Russo was right and they have filmed a lot of backstage segments with Jeff because if the results for the next 3 weeks are true then what was the point in bringing Jeff back? Why bring him back for one week only? I just think both sides are desperate, both sides don't like each other but need each other. Jeff can't get anyone to take his GFW, Dixie has a network for TNA but might lose it, i think some kind of merger will happen at some point. I do think TNA getting more viewers than ROH has woken a lot of online fans up to see how things really work. TNA's audience are not all tuning into ROH and maybe that reflects on GFW? Maybe Jeff is seeing that a pure wrestling show just doesn't draw as many viewers as a wrestling show with many entertainment based segments. Maybe other networks are looking at that too, a pure wrestling show like ROH vs modern day pro wrestling TNA and how different the numbers are. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4083 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,700
|
Quote:
I would say Aries quit as yes his contact was up but from what I have read they wanted him to sign a new one and he turned them down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4084 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,167
|
A wrestling show like ROH which has it's shows first run on another network in various sections of the country doesn't get the same viewership as TNA, which is being first run on Destination America? Hardly a surprise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4085 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,669
|
TNA Hall of Fame 2015
Spoiler
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4086 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 37,008
|
I was wondering if this is the likely last TNA HOF if they will induct a few people.
Edit to add. Who will be the first to be in both TNA and WWE HOF. Sting Angle. Dudley Boyz/Team 3D. I would say Sting myself. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4087 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,371
|
Quote:
He did and then sold a majority stake to Dixie's parents.
Well apart from the fact of quitting WWE back in 95. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4088 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,167
|
Quote:
That was probably the worst decision hes ever made.
Quote:
Well apart from the fact of quitting WWE back in 95.
in what way was that a bad decision?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4089 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 31,653
|
Quote:
A wrestling show like ROH which has it's shows first run on another network in various sections of the country doesn't get the same viewership as TNA, which is being first run on Destination America? Hardly a surprise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4090 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 31,653
|
Quote:
That was probably the worst decision hes ever made.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4091 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 12,683
|
Something to consider with the run of people leaving TNA There's been some suggestion that a lot of these people aren't so much leaving TNA as they are looking to get out of (potentially) restrictive and limited TNA deals. Its possible for example that guys like Storm and Magnus would be happy to come back and work the next round of TNA tapings but would want to be contracted to do so as freelancers and not tied to TNA deals. In the grand scheme of things this is likely down to the fact that TNA aren't running very many dates any more so these guys just aren't earning what they once were from their deals. The second thing to consider is that there's reports that some backstage are a little unsure about the people leaving TNA. There's some pushing the idea that actually this is all set up for some kind of GFW vs. TNA angle. Quote:
They're clearly shutting down. There's no last chance saloon after a network like DA drops you. They *were* the last chance saloon.
Quote:
So why burden yourself with the cost of buying TNA if it's not going to solve any of the problems?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4092 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 12,683
|
Quote:
I do think TNA getting more viewers than ROH has woken a lot of online fans up to see how things really work. TNA's audience are not all tuning into ROH and maybe that reflects on GFW? Maybe Jeff is seeing that a pure wrestling show just doesn't draw as many viewers as a wrestling show with many entertainment based segments. Maybe other networks are looking at that too, a pure wrestling show like ROH vs modern day pro wrestling TNA and how different the numbers are.
Secondly Impact and RoH really aren't that far apart particularly not when you break down the cost of the programming. If I'm a network executive I'm going to be much more tempted to bring in an RoH show than I am a TNA show. In part this is to do with the relative histories of the two but also because I'm going to find it much easier to make money from RoH. Its a substantially cheaper product that's reaching a not dissimilar audience level as TNA. There's also the issue that I can more easily package a 'pure wrestling' show than I can whatever it is you want to call the TNA product at this point. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4093 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Posts: 16,709
|
It's Yer Self
I'm watching it, but I'm gonna be ****ed off if there's no Grado
|
|
|
|
|
#4094 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,700
|
Will you be dancing to Madonna if he does come out?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4095 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: BUDDIETOWN
Posts: 20,385
|
why the HELL isn't angle v EC3 on slammiversary???
an utterly pointless tag match instead |
|
|
|
|
|
#4096 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Posts: 16,709
|
Quote:
Will you be dancing to Madonna if he does come out?
|
|
|
|
|
#4097 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Posts: 16,709
|
Quote:
why the HELL isn't angle v EC3 on slammiversary???
an utterly pointless tag match instead |
|
|
|
|
#4098 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Nest, with BirdyBee
Posts: 9,617
|
Im pretty green when it comes to Challenge's TNA coverage, but is Slammiversary the first PPV they've aired live?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4099 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 37,008
|
Quote:
They've already taped the next several weeks Impacts in the same building & didn't want to have to give away who won in advance.
We also know who wins the Aries vs Eddie Edwards match as the final match has already happened. Only match we don't really know about is KOTM |
|
|
|
|
|
#4100 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Posts: 16,709
|
Quote:
Im pretty green when it comes to Challenge's TNA coverage, but is Slammiversary the first PPV they've aired live?
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:33.




