• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: US
TNA Wrestling on Challenge TV (Part 2)
<<
<
173 of 248
>>
>
FMKK
01-07-2015
It depends on how the angle goes, though it'll obviously require some suspension of disbelief. They could play it as Jarrett worming his way back into power in TNA to make the change. It would be yet another storyline where we're being told that Dixie Carter is such an idiot that she's been manipulated out of power by someone she trusted, which is amusing in numerous respects.
Hollie_Louise
01-07-2015
Originally Posted by whedon247:
“why didnt wwe just put armed security on arena doors to stop wcw invading? why did people want to see a wcw invasion if its so unrealistic?

come on now.”

You're telling me it's completely logical that every single one of TNA's television channels would just relabel the show GFW Impact? You think TNA executives would allow GFW to walk in and put their ring apron on? No it wouldn't happen.
James Frederick
01-07-2015
Originally Posted by Hollie_Louise:
“The other thing, I don't find it realistic that GFW just walk in and set up their ring, logo, change the show logo and TNA/Destination America/all television providers go along with the change.”

That's why I think Jarrett may be wanting to buy it as if he does the internasional TV deal's may come with it and it could be classed as a rebranding.
Hollie_Louise
01-07-2015
Originally Posted by FMKK:
“It depends on how the angle goes, though it'll obviously require some suspension of disbelief. They could play it as Jarrett worming his way back into power in TNA to make the change. It would be yet another storyline where we're being told that Dixie Carter is such an idiot that she's been manipulated out of power by someone she trusted, which is amusing in numerous respects.”

The build to GFW actually taking over would have to be gradual though. If by the end of the next tapings GFW have manoeuvred Dixie out and are running their shows, it's a pointless storyline IMO.
James Frederick
01-07-2015
What if that is the plan in real life pull a Pillman if you wish.

Jarrett gets Dixie to release all her top talent to go to GFW to make this invasion look real then when he has signed them it's (enter appoprate word here) you Dixie.

FMKK
01-07-2015
Originally Posted by Hollie_Louise:
“You're telling me it's completely logical that every single one of TNA's television channels would just relabel the show GFW Impact? You think TNA executives would allow GFW to walk in and put their ring apron on? No it wouldn't happen.”

How realistic is it that WWE used to change GMs all the time etc. without the board of directors and investors reacting? Sometimes suspension of disbelief is required. I mean, WCW ran an NWO Nitro and an NWO PPV.

Originally Posted by Hollie_Louise:
“The build to GFW actually taking over would have to be gradual though. If by the end of the next tapings GFW have manoeuvred Dixie out and are running their shows, it's a pointless storyline IMO.”

It's kinda funny that the angle may be mirroring real life. Jarrett is going to be booked as someone who is trying to take over the company to merge it with GFW and take the TV deals while he's likely at least considering that behind the scenes. Like how Hogan and Bischoff wormed their way into control behind the scenes before doing the exact same thing on a TV angle.
Hollie_Louise
01-07-2015
Originally Posted by FMKK:
“How realistic is it that WWE used to change GMs all the time etc. without the board of directors and investors reacting? Sometimes suspension of disbelief is required. I mean, WCW ran an NWO Nitro and an NWO PPV.”

I'm all for suspending reality for wrestling shows, all I'm saying is it shouldn't just happen that easily. The invasion needs to be dripped through TNA, not dropped on it like a bomb.

For example, GFW needs to invade TNA shows, not hold GFW shows. If all TNA shows become promoted under the GFW banner, there is no invasion really. They've just walked in, taken over and TNA seemingly made no attempts to stop it.

You need weeks of interference in matches, attacking referees, crew etc. You need a woman to come in and physically remove Dixie so that Jarrett, as minority owner, is the next person down the ladder. Then GFW can begin to use logos and sets and change the name, not when the majority owner is walking around.

That's all I'm saying, there's no point having a war between two promotions that is over before it began.[/quote]
seibu
01-07-2015
I don't find a GFW invasion as hard to believe as a lot of wrestling angles.

Week 1: GFW run in and disrupt every single match on an episode of Impact (Aces & Eights did this once actually). The commentators apologise.

Week 2: GFW do it again, and actually succeed in tearing down part of the set. They beat up the commentary team at the end and announce directly to camera their terms - a match for ownership of the company next week, Angle vs Jeff, or they'll basically just stop Impact being filmed.

Week 3: Jeff defeats Angle in an epic match with insane levels of interference. Show ends with Impact set being torn apart by GFW roster.

Week 4: GFW Impact debuts.

It's not that hard. Maybe not every international outlet would play along in relabelling the show in the EPG, but I bet a few would.

EDIT: Ah, Hollie, I can see we have similar-ish ideas on this! I imagined it taking 4 weeks minimum, yeah. Sorry I didn't make that clear.
James Frederick
01-07-2015
Originally Posted by FMKK:
“It's kinda funny that the angle may be mirroring real life. Jarrett is going to be booked as someone who is trying to take over the company to merge it with GFW and take the TV deals while he's likely at least considering that behind the scenes. Like how Hogan and Bischoff wormed their way into control behind the scenes before doing the exact same thing on a TV angle.”

I just said something like that above at the moment he's getting her to send him all her top talent he's singing them to legal contracts so he could turn around and not allow them to work on TNA TV or only work if they win.

I could see this with him legit screwing Dixie over and taking everything.
AlexiR
01-07-2015
Originally Posted by seibu:
“FMKK, I agree that the finish of Storm / Magnus was weird. Not only was it hard to execute convincingly, but I agree - why not just put Magnus over? It wouldn't damage Storm - he still managed to virtually kill him and (presumably) actually kill his fiance.”

Perhaps the issue here is TNA feel they're going to work with Storm again but not Magnus?

Originally Posted by whedon247:
“why didnt wwe just put armed security on arena doors to stop wcw invading? why did people want to see a wcw invasion if its so unrealistic?”

But the WCW invasion angle wasn't a hostile takeover of the type that's being described here. Part of the storyline became that the then WWE CEO gave the WCW guys permission to be there. It then just effectively became an internal faction war/power struggle.

Originally Posted by FMKK:
“How realistic is it that WWE used to change GMs all the time etc. without the board of directors and investors reacting? Sometimes suspension of disbelief is required. I mean, WCW ran an NWO Nitro and an NWO PPV.”

The nWo of course included the man running WCW so that they'd run their own shows wasn't that big a stretch because in kayfabe Bischoff would have been in a position to make that happen.

Originally Posted by seibu:
“EDIT: Ah, Hollie, I can see we have similar-ish ideas on this! I imagined it taking 4 weeks minimum, yeah. Sorry I didn't make that clear.”

I think it would need to take infinitely more than 4 weeks (which could be problematic for TNA). In general I think the way for TNA to approach this angle is to have Jarrett back on television properly for weeks if not months before there's even a hint at a GFW invasion. Then when you finally pull the trigger on it you can play with the idea that he's been back in TNA for weeks/months laying the ground work. Winning back his old friends backstage in the offices and on the roster.
Hollie_Louise
01-07-2015
Originally Posted by seibu:
“I don't find a GFW invasion as hard to believe as a lot of wrestling angles.

Week 1: GFW run in and disrupt every single match on an episode of Impact (Aces & Eights did this once actually). The commentators apologise.

Week 2: GFW do it again, and actually succeed in tearing down part of the set. They beat up the commentary team at the end and announce directly to camera their terms - a match for ownership of the company next week, Angle vs Jeff, or they'll basically just stop Impact being filmed.

Week 3: Jeff defeats Angle in an epic match with insane levels of interference. Show ends with Impact set being torn apart by GFW roster.

Week 4: GFW Impact debuts.

It's not that hard. Maybe not every international outlet would play along in relabelling the show in the EPG, but I bet a few would.

EDIT: Ah, Hollie, I can see we have similar-ish ideas on this! I imagined it taking 4 weeks minimum, yeah. Sorry I didn't make that clear.”

I think you need to be looking at 4 weeks for the basics alone and then begin to ramp it up over the next 4 before ultimately GFW takes over. A month isn't really that long a span for TNA to become GFW.

On re-labelling the show, in talking in storyline terms. I don't believe in storyline that would happen.
FMKK
01-07-2015
TNA has a set of tapings in July and then may be off TV come September. They really don't have time for a slow build.
Hollie_Louise
01-07-2015
Originally Posted by FMKK:
“TNA has a set of tapings in July and then may be off TV come September. They really don't have time for a slow build.”

I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt that Dixie is just piss poor at PR and has decided to just not reference the cancellation rumours.

I don't think 4 weeks is anywhere near long enough to launch an invasion angle and I'd prefer them to just say Jarrett purchased it if they are going to cram an invasion angle into 4 weeks
whedon247
01-07-2015
is this gfw invasion storyline even confirmed btw? or just fan speculation?
FMKK
01-07-2015
Originally Posted by whedon247:
“is this gfw invasion storyline even confirmed btw? or just fan speculation?”

Speculation for now.

Spoiler
Meltzer was talking about it being at least discussed but the spoilers for the most recent tapings don't suggest that anything is happening at least yet.
whedon247
01-07-2015
ffs come on tna, you aint got much time if rumours are to be beleived.
ags_rule
01-07-2015
Originally Posted by Hollie_Louise:
“You're telling me it's completely logical that every single one of TNA's television channels would just relabel the show GFW Impact? You think TNA executives would allow GFW to walk in and put their ring apron on? No it wouldn't happen.”

In a business that is all about suspending disbelief, you find this a hard pill to swallow?

wCw produced an entire PPV around an nWo brand that, at the time, was still being marketed as an invasion of forces outside of wCw control.

WWF ran a match on RAW entirely under wCw branding - with the associated logos, ring aprons and even commentators.

A temporary rebranding of TNA to further an angle is not unthinkable.
James Frederick
01-07-2015
Spoiler
TBF at the last set of tapings they didn't even know about it I think it all came together in a few hours even the TNA Talent didn't know Jarrett was showing up until the live Impact even Kurt didn't know until he heard "Hi Dad" and his kids and Karen was standing there.

After the live Impact they didn't have time to rewtite 3-4 months worth if scripts in a few minuites.

But yes it is going to look stupid none of it is mentioned for months then the invasion is over and lost (or won if your GFW) in a few weeks
James Frederick
01-07-2015
Originally Posted by ags_rule:
“In a business that is all about suspending disbelief, you find this a hard pill to swallow?

wCw produced an entire PPV around an nWo brand that, at the time, was still being marketed as an invasion of forces outside of wCw control.

WWF ran a match on RAW entirely under wCw branding - with the associated logos, ring aprons and even commentators.

A temporary rebranding of TNA to further an angle is not unthinkable.”



TBF they both had people in (real life) power behind the scenes to make that beliveable.
seibu
01-07-2015
Slow builds are nice but they can be too slow. For example, I thought Aces & Eights was good but a little too slow. And of course, it should have ended when bully won the title. That was 'mission accomplished' for them and the faction lost direction after that.

I was cramming it into four weeks because TNA only have about eight weeks to live. And after the GFW takeover, you can begin the *actual* inter-promo war where an ousted TNA roster & Dixie try to re-invade and win the company back. Maybe the initial invasion could run longer than 4 weeks, but personally I don't think it has to be too slow.

I wouldn't have the patience personally for Jarrett to spend loads of time covertly building alliances and worming his way into power. Since the end-game is obvious I think that would risk being boring. YMMV though, obviously.
dave_windows
01-07-2015
Originally Posted by seibu:
“Alexi, I think the key to the TNA / GFW invasion (if they do it) is that GFW has to win, at least temporarily. I want GFW to completely disrupt and dominate TNA shows, and in a month or so I want to see a GFW title sequence, GFW belts and set changes, the show called 'GFW Imapct' in my EPG (or something else?). The works.

That's the only way the angle becomes something original and exciting. Anything else is just another bloody faction angle.

I'd argue too that's the only way the old WWF / WCW invasion could have worked. I think the idea to have WCW take over RAW was really exciting. It would have given them the platform which you rightly point out they lacked after Nitro's cancellation, to have a proper inter-promotional war. It's a shame the network allegedly vetoed the idea.

The problem with the lack of the big WCW names, however, seems like it was insoluble and would have severely tested the angle I admit. TNA / GFW has a similar problem as James Frederick pointed out - there's not much truly 'new' talent. So I think the answer is to lean heavily on talent which hasn't been in TNA for a while - so Jeff as obvious figurehead, and a roster of people who haven't been on TNA for a while or who never have, especially if they have alleged beef with the company.

The rumours of Magnus and Storm 'crossing over' to GFW are worrying. If it was up to me there would be no crossing over, it dilutes the whole angle. I really hated it when WWE wrestlers started crossing over to 'WCW' and 'ECW'. Killed the entire angle stone dead for me.”

Why not just debut it a week later at atlanta.
Steveaustin316
01-07-2015
Originally Posted by AlexiR:
“The problem of course is that without the McMahon family feud aspect I'm not sure what the end game for the Invasion angle is. I mean what's the narrative that drives a WCW invasion long term without that? Particularly a WCW invasion without stars. Sure you can get a series of one-off shows and matches without a big narrative focus but its hard to drive months (or even years) of television without it. WCW needed a figure head and in truth I think Shane McMahon was probably the best option they had. Stephanie's involvement with ECW was utterly ridiculous though.

To be honest I think the basic story they were telling was good. Shane and Stephanie basically getting fed up of waiting for Vince to die and going into business for themselves to drive him out of business is a good story. It just doesn't work as well when it all has to play out on WWE television. In many respects I think WWE didn't go far enough with the McMahon family feud angle. I think it probably would have worked much more effectively if they'd made Vince his own worst enemy. Play with the fact that he's run or runs WWE as his own personal kingdom and this has not only driven his kids into competition with him but results in many of his top stars taking the chance to get out and work in a better place. That they were so intent on pushing WCW as the heels was problematic.

Even with that said I think they still had the chance to save all of this if they'd gone further down the road they teased with Paul Heyman being the evil manipulator pulling all the strings. Heyman did an epic promo on Smackdown during the Invasion (he did a couple in fact) where he just rips into Vince McMahon for stealing all his ideas and ultimately meaning he went out of business. If they'd put that front and centre as a story point the Invasion still could have worked.

In general the problem is that the Invasion was just half arsed I guess. They knew people were going to buy basically no matter what so they just didn't really bother.”

It would have been interesting to see what would have happened if they could have persuaded Eric Bischoff to be a part of the Invasion. If they insisted on having Shane and Stephanie involved in the story, he could have played a valuable role in making it work with them.

Shane could have said that he is so determined to destroy Vince that he is bringing in the person who came the closest to doing so in the past. If they had Bischoff as well as Heyman involved in the angle, it would have been so much better.

They could have explained Stephanie's role in the story by saying that she provided the money to bring ECW back and that Heyman would be their leader.
dave_windows
03-07-2015
TNA taping some more stuff yesterday for after September which is odd.
Hollie_Louise
03-07-2015
Both ROH and TNA took drops this week:

ROH:
20:00 - 157,000
23:00 - 81,000
Total: 238,000 (-92,000)

TNA:
21:00 - 267,000
00:00 - 51,000
Total - 318,000 (-133,000)
dave_windows
03-07-2015
Is that US or UK?
<<
<
173 of 248
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map