Originally Posted by seibu:
“Re Hogan, I'm not suggesting he be on TV more, just that he be given a character and reason to exist beyond bland corporate ambassador.
Surely the greatest name of all time in wrestling should have something to say about current wrestlers and feuds from time to time? There have been loads of moments over the last few years where Hogan's music hitting unexpectedly during a segment and him coming out to say something relevant to what was going on would have worked better than just wheeling him out at the start of the show to say "buy this"...”
Can you please name some of these moments? I guess maybe during the Sting/Triple H feud but I struggle to think of anything outside of that and they had Flair much more effectively fill the role that Hogan would have filled there.
I think the problem with Hogan (as TNA discovered) is that he sucks all the oxygen out of the room. I don't think this is always intentional but unless he's in the ring with guys of equal standing, as he was at Mania with Rock and Austin, then inevitably things tend to become the Hulk Hogan show. I think WWE are right not to use him for that reason alone.
The bigger problem I have is that I'm not sure what he'd actually do on television at this point. I'm not sure there's a productive role for him to play that's actually going to enhance the show in anyway.
Originally Posted by seibu:
“Well, first of all, it's an idea of the top of my head on a Thursday afternoon.
But I suppose it's the same reason you had Jake Roberts get an actual no-fooling snake to actually no-fooling bite Randy Savage. It's so you'd go "what the actual hell am I watching here?".”
Only the reason they had Jake Roberts have a snake bite Savage was to sell a Savage/Roberts feud. It wasn't just some random isolated what the hell is this moment. It was part of a larger story and plan.
Originally Posted by James Frederick:
“But without TV in the US they are just a small time indie not the number 2 promotion and if DA doesn't want them they can't go any lower.”
They certainly can go lower (there are no shortage of cable channels and distribution models out there). The problem is that if DA drop them they're going to struggle to sell themselves as a viable option for networks lower down the food chain. If DA didn't or couldn't get anything out of this arrangement I'm not sure what another network will. Unless they're seriously willing to slash their license fee but if they're willing to do that and DA still aren't interested in keeping them then they have serious problems.